RallyIQ

Game plan

Su Wei Hsieh v Timea Bacsinszky

Every number combines what Su Wei Hsieh does well with what Timea Bacsinszky allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Su Wei Hsieh wins, best of 3 53%90%: 23%–81% · best of 5: 54%
Serve points won 54.0% / 53.5% Su / Timea · tour 56.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 49%serve 53.9% / 54.0%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Su Wei Hsieh's record against Timea Bacsinszky's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +3.6 on serve, +14.6 on return vs expectation (129 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerSuTimea
Direction choice+0.33 ±0.09
better than 96%
+0.03 ±0.12
better than 58%
Shot selection−0.59 ±0.14
better than 9%
−0.67 ±0.22
better than 7%
Execution+0.24 ±0.61
better than 70%
+0.64 ±0.58
better than 83%
Points left on the table2.26 ±0.15
lower than 89%
2.57 ±0.18
lower than 56%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Su Wei Hsieh serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowSu winsv TimeaMatchupOptimal
Wide48%66%65%65.8%±7.263% ▲
Body20%54%53%49.8%±11.25% ▼
T32%60%65%57.4%±9.232%

Optimal v Timea Bacsinszky: +1.4±1.1 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +5.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowSu winsv TimeaMatchupOptimal
Wide45%66%65%65.9%±9.145%
Body20%60%50%53.3%±10.95% ▼
T35%61%68%64.6%±7.950% ▲

Optimal v Timea Bacsinszky: +0.5±1.1 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Timea Bacsinszky serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowTimea winsv SuMatchupOptimal
Wide40%65%66%64.7%±8.355% ▲
Body14%63%49%54.5%±11.80% ▼
T46%60%72%65.1%±8.245%

Optimal v Su Wei Hsieh: +1.0±1.1 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowTimea winsv SuMatchupOptimal
Wide40%61%66%60.9%±8.539%
Body19%55%59%58.2%±10.94% ▼
T42%57%68%60.2%±8.757% ▲

Optimal v Su Wei Hsieh: +0.6±1.2 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +0.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Su Wei Hsieh returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv TimeaValue
FH slice through the middle27%−6.7+0.5+0.7−5.5±2.2
FH crosscourt23%+5.3+4.5+2.5+12.3±4.2
FH through the middle22%+4.2+0.1+1.0+5.3±3.0
FH slice crosscourt18%−6.6−1.1±0.0−7.8±2.0
FH down the line5%+1.5+2.1+3.4+7.1±4.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +11.4±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (386 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv TimeaValue
BH through the middle47%+6.0+2.9+1.2+10.2±2.5
BH crosscourt35%+7.7+0.9+1.8+10.4±3.5
BH down the line9%+2.2+2.4−0.1+4.5±4.6
BH slice down the line3%−12.5−1.5±0.0−14.0±2.0
BH slice through the middle3%−6.2−0.9−0.4−7.6±1.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.5±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (338 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv TimeaValue
FH crosscourt52%+0.5+1.5−0.2+1.8±4.5
FH through the middle23%−3.2+0.6+0.4−2.2±3.0
FH down the line15%−0.6+4.9+0.4+4.8±4.7
FH slice through the middle10%−15.2±0.0±0.0−15.2±1.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.2±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (88 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv TimeaValue
BH crosscourt47%+1.5+0.4−3.1−1.2±3.6
BH through the middle30%−2.6+0.7−3.0−4.9±2.8
BH down the line23%−0.5+0.8−1.6−1.3±5.2

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.1±2.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (207 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Timea Bacsinszky returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SuValue
FH through the middle34%+4.2+1.3+0.7+6.2±2.7
FH slice through the middle31%−6.7+0.6+0.5−5.7±2.3
FH down the line14%+1.5+1.1+2.5+5.1±4.6
FH crosscourt8%+5.3−2.4+1.3+4.2±4.0
FH slice crosscourt7%−6.6−0.3+0.6−6.3±2.4

Lean FH through the middle: +5.7±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (260 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SuValue
BH through the middle61%+6.0−0.6+1.8+7.2±2.5
BH crosscourt18%+7.7+0.9±0.0+8.7±3.3
BH down the line16%+2.2+1.0+3.9+7.1±4.5
BH slice through the middle5%−6.2+0.2−2.5−8.6±2.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.0±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (136 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SuValue
FH through the middle42%−3.2−0.2−1.1−4.5±3.0
FH down the line36%−0.6+0.9+1.6+1.9±5.1
FH crosscourt17%+0.5−0.5+1.9+1.9±4.2
BH through the middle5%−1.0+0.3+0.2−0.4±1.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.8±4.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (107 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SuValue
BH through the middle41%−2.6+0.6+0.2−1.9±2.6
BH crosscourt31%+1.5+1.5+1.8+4.8±3.2
BH down the line29%−0.5−1.7+1.3−0.9±4.8

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.3±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (49 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Su Wei Hsieh

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return+4.9±5.5+3.7+1.2
FH to the middle · return+4.8±3.8+1.5+3.4
FH to their backhand · rally+4.8±5.0+2.8+2.0
FH to their forehand · serve +1+3.9±5.1+0.2+3.7
BH to the middle · return+1.9±3.0+2.2−0.3
FH to their backhand · serve +1+1.4±5.8+0.5+0.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return +1−4.2±5.2−2.9−1.2
BH to the middle · rally−3.9±2.7−0.3−3.5
BH to their forehand · return +1−3.8±6.8−0.8−2.9
BH to their forehand · rally−3.6±5.4−1.1−2.5
BH to the middle · return +1−2.6±3.6−1.2−1.4

Timea Bacsinszky

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · serve +1+14.1±6.7+5.3+8.8
BH to their forehand · return+11.3±6.4+5.3+6.0
FH to their backhand · return+4.9±5.6+1.3+3.6
FH to the middle · return+3.1±3.2+2.2+1.0
FH slice to the middle · rally+3.1±3.9+2.9+0.2
BH to the middle · return+2.9±3.1+0.8+2.1

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · rally−5.1±5.5−4.3−0.8
FH to their backhand · serve +1−4.0±5.3−3.0−1.0
FH to their forehand · serve +1−3.3±5.2−1.3−2.1
FH to their forehand · rally−2.1±4.0−0.8−1.3
BH to the middle · serve +1−1.9±3.7−1.2−0.7

Against Timea Bacsinszky-like opponents

Su Wei Hsieh vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–55.2%42.1%
Players most similar to Timea Bacsinszky1 58.6%55.9%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Mirra Andreeva, Leylah Fernandez, Elise Mertens, Sorana Cirstea, Katerina Siniakova, Victoria Azarenka, Anastasija Sevastova, Kateryna Baindl, Simona Halep, Agnieszka Radwanska. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.