RallyIQ

WTA · Right-handed · 3 charted matches · 2015–2020

Arina Rodionova

Shot expected value

The share of points Arina Rodionova goes on to win after each option in the positions they face most often, shrunk toward tour average when the sample is small. Showing the 8 most-used options; teal marks the best one with at least 30 shots.

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side

position worth 43% to the average player · 89 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH crosscourt 43% 47.2%±10.8 46.7%
FH through the middle 31% 52.6%±11.9 41.3%
FH down the line 13% 49.9%±14.5 44.9%

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side

position worth 45% to the average player · 58 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
BH through the middle 38% 51.6%±12.7 43.3%
BH crosscourt 21% 51.6%±14.5 47.6%
BH slice through the middle 19% 35.1%±14.1 34.4%

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle

position worth 50% to the average player · 49 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH through the middle 27% 52.0%±14.3 45.8%
BH down the line 24% 50.0%±14.5 50.0%
FH crosscourt 22% 43.7%±14.7 52.7%

Long rally, 9+: drive to your forehand side

position worth 44% to the average player · 44 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH crosscourt 59% 53.0%±12.1 47.0%
FH through the middle 25% 49.3%±14.8 41.5%

Serve under pressure

Deuce court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 55% 57% 64% / 66%
Body 13% 14% 55% / 57%
T 32% 29% 65% / 68%

101 normal · 7 break-point 1st serves

Ad court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 35% 29% 59% / 66%
Body 35% 48% ▲ 58% / 56%
T 30% 24% 57% / 64%

83 normal · 21 break-point 1st serves

Is the serve mix in equilibrium?

Game theory says a well-mixed server wins equally often with every direction they use. If one direction wins more, it's underused and points are being left behind. This is the minimax test Walker and Wooders ran on Wimbledon finals, applied to every charted first serve. Win rates include faults. "Optimal" allows for returners reading a habit. A direction loses 0.19 points per 100 serves for every 10 points of habitual usage, measured from WTA servers whose mix drifted between matches. Shifts stay within the range servers' habits actually vary, the only range that response was measured over.

Deuce court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide56% 59.1%±8.5 n=60
Body13% 56.4%±12.3 n=14
T31% 52.9%±10.3 n=34

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.61).

Ad court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide34% 43.6%±10.1 n=35
Body38% 50.7%±9.9 n=39
T29% 46.9%±10.6 n=30

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.54).

Return by serve direction

Return points won against each serve direction, compared with the tour average.

ServeCourtDirectionPointsWonvs tour
1stAd courtBody 2 44% +0.4±14.4
1stAd courtT 22 30% −5.4±10.5
1stAd courtWide 38 28% −6.0±9.0
1stDeuce courtBody 7 45% +2.7±13.5
1stDeuce courtT 31 34% +1.7±10.0
1stDeuce courtWide 29 39% +5.3±10.5
2ndAd courtBody 15 50% −5.0±12.3
2ndAd courtT 4 52% −3.5±14.1
2ndAd courtWide 17 64% +10.4±11.5
2ndDeuce courtBody 16 53% −1.5±12.1
2ndDeuce courtT 11 58% +2.0±12.7
2ndDeuce courtWide 10 50% −3.4±13.0

Discovered sequences

Mined from every me → opponent → me run of three shots, with no templates. Ranked by how much more often Arina Rodionova wins the point once the sequence happens, weighted by how often it happens. Think of them as chess openings.

  1. FH crosscourt → FH crosscourt → FH crosscourt used 2.7% · won 45% · −5.0±12.9 vs own baseline · −10.8 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Kiki Bertens (3/10)

Charted matches