ATP · Right-handed · 4 charted matches · 2022–2025
Dmitry Popko
Against an average opponent
Serve and return points won, refitted against every opponent at once so a record built on weak or strong opposition is put on the same scale. Career, all surfaces, with a 90% margin. Raw is the plain share of points won.
Value per 100 shots
Points gained per 100 shots compared with an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for the strength of the opponents faced, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Raw is before the opponent adjustment. Built on 2,149 shots.
Shot expected value
The share of points Dmitry Popko goes on to win after each option in the positions they face most often, shrunk toward tour average when the sample is small. Showing the 8 most-used options; teal marks the best one with at least 30 shots.
Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side
position worth 46% to the average player · 179 shots
| Option | Used | Win % | Tour |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH crosscourt | 62% | 50.8%±7.2 | 47.6% |
| BH through the middle | 21% | 43.4%±10.8 | 43.7% |
| FH inside-out | 13% | 48.6%±12.4 | 51.8% |
Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side
position worth 44% to the average player · 118 shots
| Option | Used | Win % | Tour |
|---|---|---|---|
| FH crosscourt | 42% | 46.2%±9.8 | 46.6% |
| FH through the middle | 25% | 52.6%±11.6 | 41.5% |
| FH down the line | 25% | 53.9%±11.6 | 44.7% |
Long rally, 9+: drive to your backhand side
position worth 46% to the average player · 116 shots
| Option | Used | Win % | Tour |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH crosscourt | 63% | 60.9%±8.3 | 48.0% |
| BH through the middle | 31% | 53.2%±11.0 | 43.8% |
Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle
position worth 51% to the average player · 111 shots
| Option | Used | Win % | Tour |
|---|---|---|---|
| FH crosscourt | 30% | 53.9%±11.3 | 52.7% |
| FH down the line | 23% | 57.2%±12.0 | 51.5% |
| FH through the middle | 18% | 51.0%±13.0 | 47.0% |
| BH crosscourt | 18% | 49.6%±13.0 | 49.1% |
| BH through the middle | 11% | 41.8%±14.3 | 46.8% |
Serve under pressure
Deuce court
| 1st serve | Usage | Break pt | Won when in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 41% | 54% ▲ | 69% / 73% |
| Body | 13% | 0% ▼ | 67% / 63% |
| T | 47% | 46% | 71% / 75% |
165 normal · 13 break-point 1st serves
Ad court
| 1st serve | Usage | Break pt | Won when in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 59% | 53% | 69% / 73% |
| Body | 14% | 11% | 53% / 63% |
| T | 27% | 37% ▲ | 65% / 72% |
139 normal · 19 break-point 1st serves
Is the serve mix in equilibrium?
Game theory says a well-mixed server wins equally often with every direction they use. If one direction wins more, it's underused and points are being left behind. This is the minimax test Walker and Wooders ran on Wimbledon finals, applied to every charted first serve. Win rates include faults. "Optimal" allows for returners reading a habit. No measurable response (−0.05 ± 0.15 points per 100 serves for every 10 points of habitual usage), measured from ATP servers whose mix drifted between matches. Shifts stay within the range servers' habits actually vary, the only range that response was measured over.
Deuce court
| 1st serve | Usage | Points won |
|---|---|---|
| Wide | 42% | 59.7%±7.9 n=74 |
| Body | 12% | 57.6%±11.4 n=21 |
| T | 47% | 60.3%±7.6 n=83 |
Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.89).
Ad court
| 1st serve | Usage | Points won |
|---|---|---|
| Wide | 58% | 60.3%±7.3 n=92 |
| Body | 13% | 46.1%±11.5 n=21 |
| T | 28% | 54.8%±9.5 n=45 |
Off equilibrium (p = 0.044): serve wide more. Gap 3.5 points per 100 first serves.
Repeating the previous direction to the same court: +1.0±10.6 points per 100 against switching. Negative means returners read repeats. Tour-wide, repeating costs women about 0.4 points per 100 and costs men nothing, so men's returners don't measurably anticipate direction. (133 repeats, 195 switches.)
Return by serve direction
Return points won against each serve direction, compared with the tour average.
| Serve | Court | Direction | Points | Won | vs tour | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Ad court | Body | 13 | 40% | +2.8±12.3 | |
| 1st | Ad court | T | 50 | 36% | +7.5±8.8 | |
| 1st | Ad court | Wide | 37 | 32% | +4.4±9.3 | |
| 1st | Deuce court | Body | 23 | 34% | −2.7±10.7 | |
| 1st | Deuce court | T | 44 | 22% | −2.7±8.0 | |
| 1st | Deuce court | Wide | 30 | 35% | +8.1±10.1 | |
| 2nd | Ad court | Body | 15 | 48% | −0.9±12.3 | |
| 2nd | Ad court | T | 4 | 49% | +0.1±14.1 | |
| 2nd | Ad court | Wide | 29 | 55% | +6.7±10.7 | |
| 2nd | Deuce court | Body | 16 | 52% | +2.5±12.1 | |
| 2nd | Deuce court | T | 42 | 53% | +3.0±9.7 | |
| 2nd | Deuce court | Wide | 7 | 47% | −1.0±13.5 |
Signature patterns
Recurring sequences that win more than Dmitry Popko's own baseline, ranked by edge weighted by how often they're used.
Serve → +1
- T serve (deuce court) → FH crosscourt used 19.7% · won 62% · −6.2±10.7 vs own baseline
Return
- Not enough data
Rally, consecutive own shots
- BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt used 11.0% · won 65% · +8.2±8.3 vs own baseline
- FH down the line → BH crosscourt used 5.9% · won 62% · +4.8±10.3 vs own baseline
- BH crosscourt → BH through the middle used 5.5% · won 59% · +1.8±10.6 vs own baseline
- BH through the middle → BH crosscourt used 3.9% · won 58% · +1.2±11.6 vs own baseline
- FH through the middle → FH crosscourt used 3.9% · won 58% · +1.2±11.6 vs own baseline
Discovered sequences
Mined from every me → opponent → me run of three shots, with no templates. Ranked by how much more often Dmitry Popko wins the point once the sequence happens, weighted by how often it happens. Think of them as chess openings.
- BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt used 3.9% · won 64% · +10.2±9.0 vs own baseline · +20.2 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Juan Carlos Prado Angelo (9/16), Sebastian Baez (16/22)
- FH down the line → BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt used 1.7% · won 59% · +5.7±11.7 vs own baseline · +16.3 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Juan Carlos Prado Angelo (6/11), Sebastian Baez (5/6)
- BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt → BH through the middle used 1.4% · won 57% · +3.2±12.5 vs own baseline · +15.8 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Juan Carlos Prado Angelo (6/11)
- BH crosscourt → BH through the middle → FH down the line used 1.1% · won 56% · +2.5±13.0 vs own baseline · +8.6 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Juan Carlos Prado Angelo (7/12)
- BH through the middle → FH down the line → BH crosscourt used 1.1% · won 53% · ±0.0±13.0 vs own baseline · +6.7 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Juan Carlos Prado Angelo (7/10)
- FH through the middle → FH down the line → BH crosscourt used 1.2% · won 52% · −1.3±12.9 vs own baseline · +3.8 vs tour on the same sequence
Strengths and vulnerabilities
Value per 100 shots compared with the average player hitting (strengths) or facing (vulnerabilities) the same shot. Only shot types seen at least 120 times.
Hurts opponents most with
| FH to their backhand · rally | +0.9 | 168 |
| BH to their backhand · rally | +0.7 | 242 |
| FH to their forehand · rally | +0.7 | 199 |
Most exposed to
| BH to their backhand · rally | −0.6 | 190 |
| FH to their forehand · rally | +1.3 | 209 |
| FH to their backhand · rally | +2.3 | 143 |
Active players who are best at the shot in the top weakness: Richard Gasquet, Nishesh Basavareddy, Arthur Cazaux, Jaume Munar, Daniel Evans