WTA · Right-handed · 5 charted matches · 2019–2026
Katie Swan
Shot expected value
The share of points Katie Swan goes on to win after each option in the positions they face most often, shrunk toward tour average when the sample is small. Showing the 8 most-used options; teal marks the best one with at least 30 shots.
Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle
position worth 50% to the average player · 113 shots
| Option | Used | Win % | Tour |
|---|---|---|---|
| FH crosscourt | 27% | 57.9%±11.4 | 52.7% |
| FH through the middle | 18% | 42.9%±12.9 | 45.8% |
| BH through the middle | 18% | 48.1%±13.0 | 46.2% |
| FH down the line | 18% | 56.1%±12.9 | 52.2% |
| BH crosscourt | 12% | 58.1%±14.1 | 50.9% |
Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side
position worth 43% to the average player · 71 shots
| Option | Used | Win % | Tour |
|---|---|---|---|
| FH crosscourt | 42% | 62.7%±11.3 | 46.7% |
| FH through the middle | 31% | 41.1%±12.5 | 41.3% |
| FH down the line | 18% | 54.5%±14.3 | 44.9% |
Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side
position worth 45% to the average player · 70 shots
| Option | Used | Win % | Tour |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH crosscourt | 60% | 50.8%±10.4 | 47.6% |
| BH through the middle | 40% | 34.7%±11.3 | 43.3% |
Return +1: drive to your middle
position worth 50% to the average player · 63 shots
| Option | Used | Win % | Tour |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH through the middle | 27% | 46.6%±13.5 | 46.2% |
| FH crosscourt | 22% | 51.4%±14.1 | 52.3% |
| FH through the middle | 19% | 38.5%±14.1 | 46.5% |
Serve under pressure
Deuce court
| 1st serve | Usage | Break pt | Won when in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 47% | 75% ▲ | 69% / 66% |
| Body | 20% | 0% ▼ | 66% / 57% |
| T | 33% | 25% | 70% / 68% |
138 normal · 4 break-point 1st serves
Ad court
| 1st serve | Usage | Break pt | Won when in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 30% | 47% ▲ | 70% / 66% |
| Body | 12% | 6% | 62% / 56% |
| T | 58% | 47% ▼ | 64% / 64% |
113 normal · 17 break-point 1st serves
Is the serve mix in equilibrium?
Game theory says a well-mixed server wins equally often with every direction they use. If one direction wins more, it's underused and points are being left behind. This is the minimax test Walker and Wooders ran on Wimbledon finals, applied to every charted first serve. Win rates include faults. "Optimal" allows for returners reading a habit. A direction loses 0.19 points per 100 serves for every 10 points of habitual usage, measured from WTA servers whose mix drifted between matches. Shifts stay within the range servers' habits actually vary, the only range that response was measured over.
Deuce court
| 1st serve | Usage | Points won |
|---|---|---|
| Wide | 48% | 62.1%±8.1 n=68 |
| Body | 20% | 59.2%±10.6 n=28 |
| T | 32% | 57.5%±9.3 n=46 |
Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.74).
Ad court
| 1st serve | Usage | Points won |
|---|---|---|
| Wide | 32% | 68.4%±9.0 n=42 |
| Body | 12% | 67.0%±11.5 n=15 |
| T | 56% | 57.6%±8.0 n=73 |
Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.11).
Return by serve direction
Return points won against each serve direction, compared with the tour average.
| Serve | Court | Direction | Points | Won | vs tour | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Ad court | Body | 30 | 47% | +3.1±10.6 | |
| 1st | Ad court | T | 35 | 41% | +5.5±10.0 | |
| 1st | Ad court | Wide | 34 | 32% | −2.7±9.6 | |
| 1st | Deuce court | Body | 30 | 41% | −1.3±10.5 | |
| 1st | Deuce court | T | 32 | 38% | +6.0±10.1 | |
| 1st | Deuce court | Wide | 49 | 34% | +0.4±8.8 | |
| 2nd | Ad court | Body | 27 | 59% | +3.8±10.7 | |
| 2nd | Ad court | T | 10 | 61% | +6.2±12.7 | |
| 2nd | Ad court | Wide | 20 | 52% | −1.4±11.6 | |
| 2nd | Deuce court | Body | 36 | 54% | −0.9±10.1 | |
| 2nd | Deuce court | T | 14 | 56% | +0.4±12.3 | |
| 2nd | Deuce court | Wide | 9 | 52% | −2.2±13.2 |
Signature patterns
Recurring sequences that win more than Katie Swan's own baseline, ranked by edge weighted by how often they're used.
Serve → +1
- Not enough data
Return
- Not enough data
Rally, consecutive own shots
- FH crosscourt → FH down the line used 13.1% · won 66% · +9.3±11.4 vs own baseline
Charted matches
- Emerson Jones v Katie Swan L BJK Cup Qualifiers RR · Hard · 11 Apr 2026
- Nuria Parrizas Diaz v Katie Swan W United Cup RR · Hard · 31 Dec 2022
- Zoe Hives v Katie Swan W United Cup RR · Hard · 29 Dec 2022
- Katie Swan v Bianca Andreescu L Bad Homburg R16 · Grass · 22 Jun 2022
- Katie Swan v Yuxuan Zhang W ITF Lexington R16 · Hard · 1 Aug 2019