RallyIQ

ATP · Right-handed · 2 charted matches · 2019–2019

Lorenzo Giustino

Shot expected value

The share of points Lorenzo Giustino goes on to win after each option in the positions they face most often, shrunk toward tour average when the sample is small. Showing the 8 most-used options; teal marks the best one with at least 30 shots.

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side

position worth 46% to the average player · 94 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
BH crosscourt 46% 59.6%±10.2 47.6%
BH through the middle 36% 36.6%±10.8 43.7%

Long rally, 9+: drive to your backhand side

position worth 46% to the average player · 82 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
BH crosscourt 57% 53.1%±10.0 48.0%
BH through the middle 35% 46.5%±11.7 43.8%

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle

position worth 51% to the average player · 74 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH crosscourt 28% 52.5%±12.8 52.7%
FH through the middle 27% 36.0%±12.5 47.0%
FH down the line 26% 34.1%±12.5 51.5%

Long rally, 9+: drive to your middle

position worth 51% to the average player · 68 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH crosscourt 29% 46.4%±13.0 52.7%
FH down the line 19% 55.7%±14.2 52.0%
BH crosscourt 18% 52.9%±14.5 49.6%

Serve under pressure

Deuce court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 68% 83% ▲ 63% / 73%
Body 3% 0% 66% / 63%
T 30% 17% ▼ 76% / 75%

74 normal · 6 break-point 1st serves

Ad court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 70% 50% ▼ 73% / 73%
Body 7% 14% 57% / 63%
T 23% 36% ▲ 63% / 72%

57 normal · 14 break-point 1st serves

Is the serve mix in equilibrium?

Game theory says a well-mixed server wins equally often with every direction they use. If one direction wins more, it's underused and points are being left behind. This is the minimax test Walker and Wooders ran on Wimbledon finals, applied to every charted first serve. Win rates include faults. "Optimal" allows for returners reading a habit. No measurable response (−0.05 ± 0.15 points per 100 serves for every 10 points of habitual usage), measured from ATP servers whose mix drifted between matches. Shifts stay within the range servers' habits actually vary, the only range that response was measured over.

Deuce court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide69% 53.6%±8.9 n=55
Body3% 60.0%±14.2 n=2
T29% 62.4%±10.9 n=23

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.10).

Ad court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide66% 62.4%±9.1 n=47
Body8% 52.6%±13.7 n=6
T25% 49.4%±11.9 n=18

Off equilibrium (p = 0.018): serve wide more. Gap 3.3 points per 100 first serves.

Return by serve direction

Return points won against each serve direction, compared with the tour average.

ServeCourtDirectionPointsWonvs tour
1stAd courtBody 7 33% −4.3±12.7
1stAd courtT 16 34% +5.5±11.4
1stAd courtWide 46 36% +8.5±9.0
1stDeuce courtBody 4 35% −1.4±13.5
1stDeuce courtT 22 32% +6.7±10.6
1stDeuce courtWide 42 27% −0.6±8.6
2ndAd courtBody 9 46% −3.7±13.1
2ndAd courtT 4 46% −2.9±14.1
2ndAd courtWide 6 51% +3.1±13.7
2ndDeuce courtBody 15 48% −0.8±12.3
2ndDeuce courtT 5 51% +1.5±13.9
2ndDeuce courtWide 6 51% +3.1±13.7

Signature patterns

Recurring sequences that win more than Lorenzo Giustino's own baseline, ranked by edge weighted by how often they're used.

Serve → +1

  1. Not enough data

Return

  1. Not enough data

Rally, consecutive own shots

  1. BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt used 9.3% · won 57% · +10.7±11.2 vs own baseline
  2. BH through the middle → BH crosscourt used 9.3% · won 50% · +3.3±11.3 vs own baseline
  3. BH crosscourt → BH through the middle used 7.7% · won 50% · +3.3±11.8 vs own baseline
  4. BH through the middle → FH crosscourt used 9.3% · won 48% · +1.5±11.3 vs own baseline

Discovered sequences

Mined from every me → opponent → me run of three shots, with no templates. Ranked by how much more often Lorenzo Giustino wins the point once the sequence happens, weighted by how often it happens. Think of them as chess openings.

  1. BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt used 2.7% · won 55% · +8.4±12.2 vs own baseline · +16.6 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Marc Polmans (11/18)
  2. BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt → BH through the middle used 2.7% · won 48% · +1.7±12.3 vs own baseline · +4.7 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Marc Polmans (8/18)
  3. BH through the middle → FH crosscourt → FH crosscourt used 2.4% · won 48% · +1.6±12.6 vs own baseline · +5.1 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Marc Polmans (9/18)
  4. BH through the middle → FH down the line → BH crosscourt used 2.3% · won 47% · +0.3±12.7 vs own baseline · +0.4 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Marc Polmans (7/13)
  5. FH crosscourt → FH crosscourt → FH through the middle used 2.9% · won 39% · −6.7±11.8 vs own baseline · −12.8 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Marc Polmans (7/20)

Strengths and vulnerabilities

Value per 100 shots compared with the average player hitting (strengths) or facing (vulnerabilities) the same shot. Only shot types seen at least 120 times.

Hurts opponents most with

BH to their backhand · rally+0.9124
FH to their forehand · rally+0.5121

Most exposed to

Charted matches