RallyIQ

WTA · Right-handed · 3 charted matches · 2022–2025

Lucie Havlickova

Shot expected value

The share of points Lucie Havlickova goes on to win after each option in the positions they face most often, shrunk toward tour average when the sample is small. Showing the 8 most-used options; teal marks the best one with at least 30 shots.

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side

position worth 45% to the average player · 53 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
BH crosscourt 45% 48.9%±12.4 47.6%
BH down the line 28% 41.0%±13.7 46.8%
BH through the middle 26% 43.1%±14.0 43.3%

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side

position worth 43% to the average player · 47 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH crosscourt 68% 58.4%±11.2 46.7%
FH through the middle 21% 50.9%±15.0 41.3%

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle

position worth 50% to the average player · 42 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH crosscourt 38% 59.8%±13.4 52.7%
FH down the line 38% 51.2%±13.7 52.2%
FH through the middle 24% 53.8%±15.0 45.8%

Serve under pressure

Deuce court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 43% 40% 71% / 66%
Body 18% 20% 61% / 57%
T 39% 40% 69% / 68%

84 normal · 5 break-point 1st serves

Ad court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 52% 40% ▼ 69% / 66%
Body 3% 10% 59% / 56%
T 45% 50% 62% / 64%

67 normal · 10 break-point 1st serves

Is the serve mix in equilibrium?

Game theory says a well-mixed server wins equally often with every direction they use. If one direction wins more, it's underused and points are being left behind. This is the minimax test Walker and Wooders ran on Wimbledon finals, applied to every charted first serve. Win rates include faults. "Optimal" allows for returners reading a habit. A direction loses 0.19 points per 100 serves for every 10 points of habitual usage, measured from WTA servers whose mix drifted between matches. Shifts stay within the range servers' habits actually vary, the only range that response was measured over.

Deuce court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide43% 68.6%±9.3 n=38
Body18% 67.4%±11.4 n=16
T39% 63.1%±9.8 n=35

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.63).

Ad court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide51% 62.6%±9.6 n=39
Body4% 63.9%±13.8 n=3
T45% 64.6%±9.8 n=35

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.73).

Return by serve direction

Return points won against each serve direction, compared with the tour average.

ServeCourtDirectionPointsWonvs tour
1stAd courtBody 6 42% −1.8±13.5
1stAd courtT 23 33% −2.2±10.7
1stAd courtWide 19 33% −1.1±11.1
1stDeuce courtBody 14 45% +2.4±12.3
1stDeuce courtT 23 35% +3.0±10.8
1stDeuce courtWide 20 34% +0.4±11.1
2ndAd courtBody 5 50% −5.0±13.9
2ndAd courtT 7 53% −2.3±13.5
2ndAd courtWide 17 60% +6.2±11.8
2ndDeuce courtBody 18 53% −1.7±11.9
2ndDeuce courtT 5 57% +0.6±13.8
2ndDeuce courtWide 3 52% −1.9±14.3

Discovered sequences

Mined from every me → opponent → me run of three shots, with no templates. Ranked by how much more often Lucie Havlickova wins the point once the sequence happens, weighted by how often it happens. Think of them as chess openings.

  1. FH crosscourt → FH crosscourt → FH crosscourt used 3.7% · won 61% · +9.0±12.7 vs own baseline · +26.7 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Anna Karolina Schmiedlova (4/6), Gabriela Andrea Knutson (6/7)

Charted matches