RallyIQ

WTA · Right-handed · 3 charted matches · 2025–2025

Matilde Jorge

Shot expected value

The share of points Matilde Jorge goes on to win after each option in the positions they face most often, shrunk toward tour average when the sample is small. Showing the 8 most-used options; teal marks the best one with at least 30 shots.

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side

position worth 45% to the average player · 69 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
BH crosscourt 43% 59.0%±11.4 47.6%
BH through the middle 35% 47.0%±12.4 43.3%

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle

position worth 50% to the average player · 47 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH crosscourt 30% 48.7%±14.1 52.7%
BH crosscourt 21% 50.6%±15.0 50.9%

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side

position worth 43% to the average player · 28 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH crosscourt 46% 43.5%±14.2 46.7%
FH through the middle 36% 44.2%±14.9 41.3%

Serve under pressure

Deuce court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 41% 22% ▼ 68% / 66%
Body 30% 0% ▼ 58% / 57%
T 29% 78% ▲ 64% / 68%

76 normal · 9 break-point 1st serves

Ad court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 37% 44% 63% / 66%
Body 28% 17% ▼ 62% / 56%
T 35% 39% 58% / 64%

60 normal · 18 break-point 1st serves

Is the serve mix in equilibrium?

Game theory says a well-mixed server wins equally often with every direction they use. If one direction wins more, it's underused and points are being left behind. This is the minimax test Walker and Wooders ran on Wimbledon finals, applied to every charted first serve. Win rates include faults. "Optimal" allows for returners reading a habit. A direction loses 0.19 points per 100 serves for every 10 points of habitual usage, measured from WTA servers whose mix drifted between matches. Shifts stay within the range servers' habits actually vary, the only range that response was measured over.

Deuce court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide39% 48.7%±10.4 n=33
Body27% 50.3%±11.3 n=23
T34% 49.3%±10.7 n=29

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.97).

Ad court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide38% 53.7%±10.6 n=30
Body26% 59.9%±11.4 n=20
T36% 48.8%±10.8 n=28

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.20).

Return by serve direction

Return points won against each serve direction, compared with the tour average.

ServeCourtDirectionPointsWonvs tour
1stAd courtBody 11 37% −6.9±12.4
1stAd courtT 6 32% −3.1±12.8
1stAd courtWide 21 36% +1.5±11.1
1stDeuce courtBody 22 42% −0.7±11.3
1stDeuce courtT 10 34% +2.0±12.3
1stDeuce courtWide 18 32% −2.3±11.0
2ndAd courtBody 10 54% −1.3±13.0
2ndAd courtT 5 53% −2.1±13.9
2ndAd courtWide 9 54% +0.5±13.1
2ndDeuce courtBody 15 59% +4.1±12.1
2ndDeuce courtT 1 57% +1.4±14.6

Charted matches