RallyIQ

ATP · Right-handed · 2 charted matches · 1991–1991

Patrick Mcenroe

Against an average opponent

Serve points won 62.2% ±4.2 raw 56.4% · tour 63.4% · 312 points
Return points won 37.1% ±4.2 raw 36.3% · tour 36.6% · 292 points

Serve and return points won, refitted against every opponent at once so a record built on weak or strong opposition is put on the same scale. Career, all surfaces, with a 90% margin. Raw is the plain share of points won.

Shot expected value

The share of points Patrick Mcenroe goes on to win after each option in the positions they face most often, shrunk toward tour average when the sample is small. Showing the 8 most-used options; teal marks the best one with at least 30 shots.

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side

position worth 46% to the average player · 91 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
BH crosscourt 65% 50.0%±9.3 47.6%
BH through the middle 24% 35.1%±12.1 43.7%
BH down the line 11% 47.6%±15.0 46.4%

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle

position worth 51% to the average player · 66 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
BH crosscourt 27% 46.9%±13.3 49.1%
FH down the line 21% 50.9%±14.1 51.5%
BH through the middle 20% 52.6%±14.3 46.8%
BH down the line 15% 48.8%±15.0 48.3%

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side

position worth 44% to the average player · 58 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH crosscourt 52% 44.6%±11.6 46.6%
FH down the line 31% 52.5%±13.3 44.7%
FH through the middle 17% 34.3%±14.3 41.5%

Return +1: drive to your forehand side

position worth 41% to the average player · 43 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH crosscourt 49% 44.0%±12.8 45.3%
FH through the middle 26% 41.6%±14.6 39.4%
FH down the line 26% 42.5%±14.6 40.9%

Serve under pressure

Deuce court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 45% 36% ▼ 73% / 73%
Body 15% 18% 61% / 63%
T 40% 45% 68% / 75%

143 normal · 11 break-point 1st serves

Ad court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 32% 39% 76% / 73%
Body 18% 14% 59% / 63%
T 51% 46% 62% / 72%

120 normal · 28 break-point 1st serves

Is the serve mix in equilibrium?

Game theory says a well-mixed server wins equally often with every direction they use. If one direction wins more, it's underused and points are being left behind. This is the minimax test Walker and Wooders ran on Wimbledon finals, applied to every charted first serve. Win rates include faults. "Optimal" allows for returners reading a habit. No measurable response (−0.05 ± 0.15 points per 100 serves for every 10 points of habitual usage), measured from ATP servers whose mix drifted between matches. Shifts stay within the range servers' habits actually vary, the only range that response was measured over.

Deuce court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide45% 57.4%±8.2 n=69
Body15% 58.1%±11.2 n=23
T40% 52.9%±8.6 n=62

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.64).

Ad court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide33% 63.3%±8.9 n=49
Body17% 54.6%±11.0 n=25
T50% 53.0%±8.1 n=74

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.19).

Return by serve direction

Return points won against each serve direction, compared with the tour average.

ServeCourtDirectionPointsWonvs tour
1stAd courtBody 22 42% +5.5±11.3
1stAd courtT 22 30% +1.6±10.4
1stAd courtWide 40 26% −1.3±8.6
1stDeuce courtBody 17 40% +3.7±11.8
1stDeuce courtT 52 27% +2.4±8.1
1stDeuce courtWide 29 26% −1.5±9.4
2ndAd courtBody 37 44% −4.9±10.0
2ndAd courtT 3 51% +1.6±14.3
2ndAd courtWide 11 48% −0.8±12.8
2ndDeuce courtBody 16 54% +4.7±12.1
2ndDeuce courtT 15 44% −5.5±12.2
2ndDeuce courtWide 13 50% +1.7±12.5

Signature patterns

Recurring sequences that win more than Patrick Mcenroe's own baseline, ranked by edge weighted by how often they're used.

Serve → +1

  1. Not enough data

Return

  1. Not enough data

Rally, consecutive own shots

  1. BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt used 20.3% · won 52% · +3.0±10.3 vs own baseline

Discovered sequences

Mined from every me → opponent → me run of three shots, with no templates. Ranked by how much more often Patrick Mcenroe wins the point once the sequence happens, weighted by how often it happens. Think of them as chess openings.

  1. BH crosscourt → FH crosscourt → BH crosscourt used 2.9% · won 48% · +1.7±12.0 vs own baseline · +1.9 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Jimmy Connors (11/22)

Charted matches