RallyIQ

WTA · Right-handed · 2 charted matches · 2021–2022

Pemra Ozgen

Shot expected value

The share of points Pemra Ozgen goes on to win after each option in the positions they face most often, shrunk toward tour average when the sample is small. Showing the 8 most-used options; teal marks the best one with at least 30 shots.

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side

position worth 45% to the average player · 29 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
BH slice crosscourt 38% 32.5%±13.8 40.4%
BH slice through the middle 34% 36.3%±14.4 34.4%

Serve under pressure

Deuce court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 42% 0% ▼ 56% / 66%
Body 25% 25% 53% / 57%
T 33% 75% ▲ 59% / 68%

73 normal · 4 break-point 1st serves

Ad court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 56% 59% 58% / 66%
Body 20% 24% 60% / 56%
T 24% 18% 64% / 64%

55 normal · 17 break-point 1st serves

Is the serve mix in equilibrium?

Game theory says a well-mixed server wins equally often with every direction they use. If one direction wins more, it's underused and points are being left behind. This is the minimax test Walker and Wooders ran on Wimbledon finals, applied to every charted first serve. Win rates include faults. "Optimal" allows for returners reading a habit. A direction loses 0.19 points per 100 serves for every 10 points of habitual usage, measured from WTA servers whose mix drifted between matches. Shifts stay within the range servers' habits actually vary, the only range that response was measured over.

Deuce court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide40% 43.9%±10.5 n=31
Body25% 47.9%±11.7 n=19
T35% 48.8%±10.9 n=27

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.71).

Ad court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide57% 47.5%±9.7 n=41
Body21% 59.8%±12.0 n=15
T22% 54.0%±12.1 n=16

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.11).

Return by serve direction

Return points won against each serve direction, compared with the tour average.

ServeCourtDirectionPointsWonvs tour
1stAd courtBody 4 48% +3.7±14.1
1stAd courtT 12 35% −0.6±12.1
1stAd courtWide 23 33% −1.7±10.6
1stDeuce courtBody 16 39% −4.0±11.8
1stDeuce courtT 13 36% +4.2±12.1
1stDeuce courtWide 19 33% −0.9±11.1
2ndAd courtBody 9 55% +0.1±13.1
2ndAd courtT 5 56% +0.7±13.8
2ndAd courtWide 10 53% −0.9±13.0
2ndDeuce courtBody 11 50% −4.9±12.8
2ndDeuce courtT 6 61% +4.6±13.4
2ndDeuce courtWide 2 50% −3.4±14.5

Charted matches