ATP · Right-handed · 4 charted matches · 2013–2019
Peter Polansky
Shot expected value
The share of points Peter Polansky goes on to win after each option in the positions they face most often, shrunk toward tour average when the sample is small. Showing the 8 most-used options; teal marks the best one with at least 30 shots.
Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side
position worth 46% to the average player · 111 shots
| Option | Used | Win % | Tour |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH through the middle | 35% | 41.9%±10.6 | 43.7% |
| BH crosscourt | 35% | 48.3%±10.7 | 47.6% |
| BH down the line | 16% | 50.7%±13.3 | 46.4% |
Long rally, 9+: drive to your backhand side
position worth 46% to the average player · 76 shots
| Option | Used | Win % | Tour |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH crosscourt | 39% | 43.2%±11.5 | 48.0% |
| BH through the middle | 28% | 48.2%±12.8 | 43.8% |
| BH down the line | 20% | 49.4%±13.9 | 46.5% |
Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side
position worth 44% to the average player · 71 shots
| Option | Used | Win % | Tour |
|---|---|---|---|
| FH crosscourt | 38% | 53.9%±12.0 | 46.6% |
| FH through the middle | 31% | 36.4%±12.2 | 41.5% |
| FH down the line | 31% | 35.6%±12.2 | 44.7% |
Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle
position worth 51% to the average player · 68 shots
| Option | Used | Win % | Tour |
|---|---|---|---|
| FH through the middle | 29% | 48.5%±13.0 | 47.0% |
| FH crosscourt | 28% | 47.5%±13.2 | 52.7% |
| FH down the line | 22% | 60.9%±13.6 | 51.5% |
Serve under pressure
Deuce court
| 1st serve | Usage | Break pt | Won when in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 34% | 25% ▼ | 69% / 73% |
| Body | 18% | 0% ▼ | 70% / 63% |
| T | 48% | 75% ▲ | 75% / 75% |
137 normal · 8 break-point 1st serves
Ad court
| 1st serve | Usage | Break pt | Won when in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 41% | 39% | 66% / 73% |
| Body | 13% | 9% | 57% / 63% |
| T | 47% | 52% | 67% / 72% |
111 normal · 23 break-point 1st serves
Is the serve mix in equilibrium?
Game theory says a well-mixed server wins equally often with every direction they use. If one direction wins more, it's underused and points are being left behind. This is the minimax test Walker and Wooders ran on Wimbledon finals, applied to every charted first serve. Win rates include faults. "Optimal" allows for returners reading a habit. No measurable response (−0.05 ± 0.15 points per 100 serves for every 10 points of habitual usage), measured from ATP servers whose mix drifted between matches. Shifts stay within the range servers' habits actually vary, the only range that response was measured over.
Deuce court
| 1st serve | Usage | Points won |
|---|---|---|
| Wide | 33% | 55.2%±9.3 n=48 |
| Body | 17% | 65.0%±10.6 n=25 |
| T | 50% | 59.4%±8.0 n=72 |
Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.28).
Ad court
| 1st serve | Usage | Points won |
|---|---|---|
| Wide | 40% | 48.3%±9.0 n=54 |
| Body | 12% | 47.4%±12.1 n=16 |
| T | 48% | 51.1%±8.5 n=64 |
Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.79).
Repeating the previous direction to the same court: −0.5±4.3 points per 100 against switching. Negative means returners read repeats. Tour-wide, repeating costs women about 0.4 points per 100 and costs men nothing, so men's returners don't measurably anticipate direction. (113 repeats, 158 switches.)
Return by serve direction
Return points won against each serve direction, compared with the tour average.
| Serve | Court | Direction | Points | Won | vs tour | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Ad court | Body | 13 | 40% | +2.8±12.3 | |
| 1st | Ad court | T | 33 | 24% | −3.6±8.9 | |
| 1st | Ad court | Wide | 23 | 31% | +3.3±10.4 | |
| 1st | Deuce court | Body | 11 | 41% | +4.8±12.7 | |
| 1st | Deuce court | T | 39 | 28% | +3.2±8.9 | |
| 1st | Deuce court | Wide | 38 | 25% | −2.0±8.7 | |
| 2nd | Ad court | Body | 21 | 51% | +1.2±11.5 | |
| 2nd | Ad court | T | 14 | 50% | +0.2±12.4 | |
| 2nd | Ad court | Wide | 25 | 48% | −0.2±11.1 | |
| 2nd | Deuce court | Body | 18 | 51% | +2.5±11.9 | |
| 2nd | Deuce court | T | 20 | 54% | +4.1±11.6 | |
| 2nd | Deuce court | Wide | 18 | 53% | +4.9±11.9 |
Discovered sequences
Mined from every me → opponent → me run of three shots, with no templates. Ranked by how much more often Peter Polansky wins the point once the sequence happens, weighted by how often it happens. Think of them as chess openings.
- BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt → BH down the line used 2.1% · won 54% · +6.9±12.7 vs own baseline · +17.1 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Gael Monfils (2/6), Kei Nishikori (5/7)
- FH crosscourt → FH crosscourt → FH down the line used 2.1% · won 47% · −0.2±12.7 vs own baseline · +0.3 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Kei Nishikori (3/6), Gael Monfils (4/8)
- BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt used 2.2% · won 44% · −3.6±12.5 vs own baseline · −9.5 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Gael Monfils (5/9)
- BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt → BH through the middle used 2.0% · won 44% · −3.9±12.8 vs own baseline · −7.8 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Kei Nishikori (2/9)
Strengths and vulnerabilities
Value per 100 shots compared with the average player hitting (strengths) or facing (vulnerabilities) the same shot. Only shot types seen at least 120 times.
Hurts opponents most with
Most exposed to
| BH to their backhand · rally | −2.4 | 124 |
Active players who are best at the shot in the top weakness: Richard Gasquet, Nishesh Basavareddy, Arthur Cazaux, Jaume Munar, Daniel Evans