Montpellier · R32 · Hard · 2 Feb 2026
Pedro Martinez v Adrian Mannarino
51–69 in points · result not charted to completion
Why it went the way it did
Adrian Mannarino won 7.5 more points than Pedro Martinez relative to what the serve alone predicted. Pedro Martinez's biggest leaks: slice shot selection −4.6, serve 1st execution −1.9, return execution −1.6.
Each shot moves its hitter's chance of winning the point. Those moves are split into direction choice, shot selection and execution, and summed here. Read both columns together: one player's gain is the other's loss.
| Shot | Pedro Martinez | Adrian Mannarino | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | |
| Serve 1st | ±0.0 | −0.1 | −1.9 | −2.1 | +0.2 | ±0.0 | +2.3 | +2.5 |
| Serve 2nd | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | +0.4 | +0.4 | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | +0.4 | +0.3 |
| Return | −0.1 | +0.5 | −1.6 | −1.2 | −0.3 | +1.2 | −1.6 | −0.7 |
| Forehand | −1.1 | +1.9 | +1.3 | +2.1 | −0.2 | +2.0 | −2.3 | −0.6 |
| Backhand | −0.2 | +0.5 | −1.3 | −1.1 | −0.1 | +0.7 | −1.5 | −0.9 |
| Slice | −0.5 | −4.6 | +3.3 | −1.9 | ±0.0 | −0.8 | −0.9 | −1.8 |
| Net | +0.1 | −0.3 | −1.0 | −1.1 | +0.4 | +0.6 | +0.5 | +1.5 |
| Touch | −0.1 | −0.7 | −1.1 | −1.8 | −0.1 | −0.2 | +0.6 | +0.4 |
| All shots | −1.9 | −2.8 | −1.9 | −6.7 | −0.2 | +3.5 | −2.5 | +0.8 |
Set by set
| Set | Pedro Martinez | Adrian Mannarino | Net, Pedro | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −2.0 | −2.1 | +0.1 | |
| 2 | −4.7 | +2.9 | −7.7 |
Adaptation
First-serve direction mix set by set, with the share of points each direction won. The scores measure whether the server moved toward the directions that had been winning earlier in this match, set to set and every two to three service games, in points per 100 first serves. Read them as a habit, not a gain: across the tour, a direction's edge in early sets barely predicts the later ones. Whether the returner responded can't be told apart from noise within one match.
Pedro Martinez serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 42% 60% | 8% 33% | 50% 89% |
| 2 | 42% 38% | 16% 33% | 42% 63% |
Set to set −0.32 per 100 first serves in sets 2+
Within sets +0.13 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Adrian Mannarino serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 62% 62% | 4% 50% | 34% 88% |
| 2 | 67% 83% | 6% 100% | 28% 100% |
Set to set −1.21 per 100 first serves in sets 2+
Within sets +0.20 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Counterfactual: the best direction every time
If each shot had gone in the direction that is usually worth most for that stroke and position, this is how many more points each player would expect to win. It's an upper bound: the best direction isn't always on, and the chart can't see the ball's pace or position.
Pedro Martinez
8.1 points left on the table across 236 shots 3.41 per 100 shots
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side hit BH slice through the middle ×10; BH slice crosscourt rates higher · 0.73 pts
- Long rally, 9+: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×7; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.38 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×6; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.30 pts
- Serve +1: deep return to your middle hit FH through the middle ×4; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.29 pts
Adrian Mannarino
7.1 points left on the table across 247 shots 2.86 per 100 shots
- Return of a 1st serve, T, deuce court hit FH through the middle ×9; FH inside-out rates higher · 0.95 pts
- Return of a 1st serve, wide, ad court hit FH through the middle ×5; FH inside-out rates higher · 0.52 pts
- Serve +1: deep return to your middle hit FH through the middle ×5; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.37 pts
- Return of a 2nd serve, body, ad court hit FH through the middle ×7; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.31 pts