Game plan
Anhelina Kalinina v Magda Linette
Every number combines what Anhelina Kalinina does well with what Magda Linette allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective
Forecast
Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Anhelina Kalinina's record against Magda Linette's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads. A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.
Head to head, per 100 shots
| Career | Anhelina | Magda |
|---|---|---|
| Direction choice | +0.24 ±0.10 better than 90% | +0.27 ±0.05 better than 93% |
| Shot selection | −0.03 ±0.17 better than 44% | +0.36 ±0.07 better than 84% |
| Execution | +0.47 ±0.64 better than 78% | −0.20 ±0.32 better than 48% |
| Points left on the table | 2.11 ±0.10 lower than 98% | 2.20 ±0.07 lower than 94% |
Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.
Structural compatibility
Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Anhelina Kalinina +1.40, Magda Linette +0.67. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.
Serve plan
The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.
Anhelina Kalinina serving
Deuce court
| 1st serve | Now | Anhelina wins | v Magda | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 39% | 61% | 67% | 61.9%±6.5 | 24% ▼ |
| Body | 27% | 55% | 64% | 61.4%±7.1 | 27% |
| T | 34% | 64% | 72% | 68.6%±6.6 | 49% ▲ |
Optimal v Magda Linette: +0.6±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +4.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Ad court
| 1st serve | Now | Anhelina wins | v Magda | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 50% | 63% | 68% | 65.7%±6.0 | 50% |
| Body | 25% | 51% | 64% | 58.8%±8.2 | 9% ▼ |
| T | 25% | 62% | 67% | 65.6%±7.3 | 41% ▲ |
Optimal v Magda Linette: +0.7±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Magda Linette serving
Deuce court
| 1st serve | Now | Magda wins | v Anhelina | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 43% | 67% | 64% | 65.8%±5.8 | 58% ▲ |
| Body | 19% | 56% | 58% | 57.0%±7.1 | 4% ▼ |
| T | 38% | 68% | 62% | 63.0%±7.0 | 38% |
Optimal v Anhelina Kalinina: +0.8±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Ad court
| 1st serve | Now | Magda wins | v Anhelina | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 59% | 66% | 64% | 64.7%±6.0 | 52% ▼ |
| Body | 9% | 53% | 51% | 47.5%±9.1 | 0% ▼ |
| T | 32% | 63% | 66% | 64.6%±6.9 | 48% ▲ |
Optimal v Anhelina Kalinina: +0.8±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Return plan
Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.
Anhelina Kalinina returning
1st serve to the forehand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Magda | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH through the middle | 38% | +4.2 | −2.3 | +0.5 | +2.4±2.4 |
| FH crosscourt | 26% | +5.3 | +3.1 | −1.0 | +7.4±3.7 |
| FH slice through the middle | 16% | −6.7 | +0.5 | +1.1 | −5.1±2.4 |
| FH down the line | 11% | +1.5 | −1.3 | +1.3 | +1.5±4.3 |
| FH slice crosscourt | 7% | −6.6 | +1.3 | +0.7 | −4.6±2.7 |
Lean FH crosscourt: +5.8±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (312 returns charted)
1st serve to the backhand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Magda | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH through the middle | 48% | +6.0 | +1.3 | +0.6 | +7.9±2.2 |
| BH crosscourt | 44% | +7.7 | −0.2 | +2.5 | +10.0±2.9 |
| BH down the line | 9% | +2.2 | +3.6 | −1.4 | +4.4±4.0 |
Lean BH crosscourt: +1.5±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (270 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)
2nd serve to the forehand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Magda | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH crosscourt | 48% | +0.5 | +0.4 | −1.4 | −0.5±3.9 |
| FH through the middle | 35% | −3.2 | +3.0 | −1.2 | −1.4±2.6 |
| FH down the line | 17% | −0.6 | +0.1 | +1.9 | +1.5±4.4 |
Lean FH crosscourt: ±0.0±2.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (81 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)
2nd serve to the backhand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Magda | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH crosscourt | 58% | +1.5 | −1.0 | +1.7 | +2.2±3.0 |
| BH through the middle | 37% | −2.6 | +1.4 | ±0.0 | −1.2±2.3 |
| BH down the line | 6% | −0.5 | +0.8 | +1.0 | +1.3±3.7 |
Lean BH crosscourt: +1.3±1.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (120 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)
Magda Linette returning
1st serve to the forehand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Anhelina | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH through the middle | 44% | +4.2 | −0.4 | +1.1 | +4.8±2.3 |
| FH crosscourt | 35% | +5.3 | −1.2 | +1.6 | +5.6±3.6 |
| FH down the line | 15% | +1.5 | −1.3 | +1.5 | +1.7±4.3 |
| FH slice through the middle | 4% | −6.7 | −2.7 | ±0.0 | −9.4±2.4 |
| FH slice crosscourt | 2% | −6.6 | −3.3 | +0.9 | −9.0±2.3 |
Lean FH crosscourt: +2.0±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (1150 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)
1st serve to the backhand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Anhelina | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH through the middle | 47% | +6.0 | +0.2 | +0.1 | +6.3±2.1 |
| BH crosscourt | 32% | +7.7 | +0.1 | −1.4 | +6.5±2.9 |
| BH down the line | 11% | +2.2 | −1.7 | −0.9 | −0.4±4.5 |
| BH slice through the middle | 4% | −6.2 | −1.8 | −1.2 | −9.2±2.5 |
| BH slice crosscourt | 3% | −4.2 | −2.5 | +0.4 | −6.3±2.6 |
Lean BH crosscourt: +2.4±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (980 returns charted)
2nd serve to the forehand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Anhelina | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH crosscourt | 48% | +0.5 | +0.6 | −1.1 | +0.1±4.2 |
| FH through the middle | 36% | −3.2 | +2.2 | −0.6 | −1.6±3.0 |
| FH down the line | 14% | −0.6 | −1.2 | +1.2 | −0.6±5.3 |
| FH slice crosscourt | 2% | −14.9 | −1.4 | ±0.0 | −16.3±1.2 |
Lean FH crosscourt: +1.0±2.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (284 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)
2nd serve to the backhand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Anhelina | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH crosscourt | 47% | +1.5 | −1.4 | −1.9 | −1.8±3.1 |
| BH through the middle | 40% | −2.6 | +0.4 | ±0.0 | −2.2±2.5 |
| BH down the line | 13% | −0.5 | −3.3 | +5.1 | +1.3±5.2 |
Lean BH down the line: +2.8±4.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (510 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)
Rally plan
Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.
Anhelina Kalinina
Favour
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| FH to their backhand · rally | +4.4±2.4 | +2.1 | +2.3 |
| BH to the middle · return +1 | +3.6±2.2 | +2.7 | +0.9 |
| BH to their forehand · return +1 | +3.4±4.2 | +0.2 | +3.2 |
| FH to their forehand · rally | +2.7±1.9 | +1.2 | +1.5 |
| FH to the middle · serve +1 | +2.2±2.3 | +1.0 | +1.2 |
| FH to their forehand · return | +2.0±3.3 | +3.4 | −1.5 |
Avoid
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| FH to the middle · return | −0.8±2.0 | −0.5 | −0.3 |
| BH to their backhand · serve +1 | −0.3±2.6 | −3.5 | +3.2 |
| BH to their backhand · return +1 | −0.2±2.6 | −0.4 | +0.2 |
| BH to their backhand · rally | +0.6±1.9 | −0.7 | +1.2 |
| FH to their backhand · serve +1 | +0.6±3.3 | −0.3 | +0.9 |
Magda Linette
Favour
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH to the middle · serve +1 | +3.4±2.0 | +2.4 | +1.0 |
| FH to their backhand · rally | +2.6±2.3 | −0.8 | +3.4 |
| BH to their backhand · serve +1 | +2.4±2.8 | +0.7 | +1.7 |
| BH to the middle · return +1 | +2.1±2.2 | +1.3 | +0.7 |
| FH to their forehand · serve +1 | +1.8±2.9 | −0.7 | +2.4 |
| FH to their backhand · return +1 | +1.6±3.6 | −2.3 | +3.9 |
Avoid
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH to their backhand · return | −3.0±2.4 | −1.3 | −1.7 |
| BH slice to the middle · rally | −1.9±2.2 | −2.7 | +0.8 |
| FH to their backhand · serve +1 | −1.9±3.0 | −0.8 | −1.1 |
| BH slice to their backhand · rally | −1.2±2.7 | −1.4 | +0.2 |
| BH to their forehand · return | −1.0±3.7 | −3.9 | +2.9 |
Against Magda Linette-like opponents
| Anhelina Kalinina v | Matches | Serve pts won | Return pts won |
|---|---|---|---|
| All charted opponents | – | 53.0% | 43.5% |
Similar by tactical fingerprint: Anastasia Potapova, Karolina Pliskova, Anna Blinkova, Linda Klimovicova, Sorana Cirstea, Yue Yuan, Anett Kontaveit, Elena Vesnina, Flavia Pennetta. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.