Game plan

Caroline Wozniacki v Petra Martic

Every number combines what Caroline Wozniacki does well with what Petra Martic allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Caroline Wozniacki wins, best of 3 78%90%: 51%–94% · best of 5: 83%

Serve points won 63.7% / 57.7% Caroline / Petra · tour 58.1%

Strengths only, no similarity priors 76%serve 63.5% / 58.1%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Caroline Wozniacki's record against Petra Martic's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −0.7 on serve, +0.7 on return vs expectation (1279 points); head-to-head: +4.0 on serve, +2.0 on return vs expectation (356 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

Career	Caroline	Petra
Direction choice	+0.03 ±0.05 better than 59%	+0.06 ±0.09 better than 64%
Shot selection	+0.06 ±0.06 better than 52%	±0.00 ±0.22 better than 45%
Execution	+2.22 ±0.16 better than 100%	+0.40 ±0.47 better than 75%
Points left on the table	2.40 ±0.07 lower than 76%	2.71 ±0.13 lower than 31%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Caroline Wozniacki +2.78, Petra Martic +1.17. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Caroline Wozniacki serving

Deuce court

1st serve	Now	Caroline wins	v Petra	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	42%	67%	72%	73.3%±4.5	57% ▲
Body	25%	62%	59%	63.0%±6.3	10% ▼
T	33%	71%	67%	70.0%±5.1	33%

Optimal v Petra Martic: +1.1±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +3.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serve	Now	Caroline wins	v Petra	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	35%	68%	64%	66.3%±5.1	50% ▲
Body	24%	59%	59%	61.7%±6.6	9% ▼
T	41%	63%	69%	68.3%±5.6	41%

Optimal v Petra Martic: +0.7±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Petra Martic serving

Deuce court

1st serve	Now	Petra wins	v Caroline	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	50%	65%	60%	59.7%±5.0	49%
Body	14%	57%	50%	50.1%±8.2	0% ▼
T	36%	72%	63%	67.4%±6.0	51% ▲

Optimal v Caroline Wozniacki: +1.2±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +6.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serve	Now	Petra wins	v Caroline	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	50%	68%	60%	62.4%±5.3	65% ▲
Body	19%	58%	47%	49.3%±7.7	4% ▼
T	32%	60%	59%	53.4%±6.4	31%

Optimal v Caroline Wozniacki: +1.2±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +5.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Caroline Wozniacki returning

1st serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Petra	Value
FH through the middle	52%	+4.2	+3.4	+0.6	+8.2±2.0
FH crosscourt	21%	+5.3	+3.9	+3.7	+12.9±3.5
FH down the line	16%	+1.5	+6.2	−2.1	+5.6±3.8
FH slice through the middle	7%	−6.7	−1.5	−0.5	−8.8±2.3
FH slice crosscourt	2%	−6.6	−1.7	+0.4	−8.0±2.8

Lean FH crosscourt: +6.0±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (2852 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Petra	Value
BH through the middle	45%	+6.0	+2.8	+1.1	+10.0±2.0
BH crosscourt	36%	+7.7	+4.0	+2.7	+14.4±2.6
BH slice through the middle	9%	−6.2	−1.9	±0.0	−8.1±2.4
BH down the line	5%	+2.2	+5.0	+1.1	+8.2±4.6
BH slice down the line	3%	−12.5	−2.1	−0.1	−14.6±3.3

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.6±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (1809 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Petra	Value
FH through the middle	43%	−3.2	+3.7	+1.9	+2.4±2.5
FH down the line	29%	−0.6	+2.5	−3.4	−1.4±4.5
FH crosscourt	26%	+0.5	+3.0	+0.9	+4.4±3.9
BH inside-out	1%	+2.2	+0.3	−1.1	+1.4±3.9
BH through the middle	1%	−1.0	−0.3	+0.7	−0.5±1.8

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.8±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (983 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Petra	Value
BH crosscourt	54%	+1.5	+3.5	+0.5	+5.5±2.6
BH through the middle	35%	−2.6	+4.1	+0.7	+2.2±2.2
BH down the line	12%	−0.5	+2.0	−1.1	+0.3±5.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.7±1.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (834 returns charted)

Petra Martic returning

1st serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Caroline	Value
FH through the middle	55%	+4.2	+1.1	+0.9	+6.1±2.0
FH crosscourt	29%	+5.3	+2.5	+1.4	+9.2±3.3
FH down the line	14%	+1.5	+0.7	+3.6	+5.7±3.8
FH slice through the middle	2%	−6.7	+0.8	+0.3	−5.6±1.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.5±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (364 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Caroline	Value
BH through the middle	41%	+6.0	−1.3	±0.0	+4.7±1.9
BH crosscourt	21%	+7.7	+0.6	+1.2	+9.5±2.8
BH slice through the middle	18%	−6.2	+0.7	−1.3	−6.8±2.2
BH slice crosscourt	9%	−4.2	−0.4	−0.1	−4.7±3.0
BH down the line	7%	+2.2	+2.0	−1.1	+3.1±3.7

Lean BH crosscourt: +7.5±2.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (441 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Caroline	Value
FH crosscourt	40%	+0.5	−1.2	+0.8	+0.1±3.6
FH down the line	38%	−0.6	+2.0	+1.5	+3.0±4.3
FH through the middle	22%	−3.2	−1.8	+1.8	−3.2±2.3

Lean FH down the line: +2.5±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (90 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Caroline	Value
BH crosscourt	33%	+1.5	+1.7	+0.3	+3.4±3.0
BH through the middle	28%	−2.6	−0.4	+1.8	−1.1±2.3
FH through the middle	13%	−2.7	−1.7	+1.8	−2.5±2.0
FH inside-in	12%	+0.7	−1.2	+0.8	+0.4±3.7
BH down the line	9%	−0.5	−1.6	+2.9	+0.8±4.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.7±2.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (189 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.