RallyIQ

Game plan

Clara Burel v Ekaterine Gorgodze

Every number combines what Clara Burel does well with what Ekaterine Gorgodze allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Clara Burel serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowClara winsv EkaterineMatchupOptimal
Wide53%56%60%49.8%±13.753%
Body27%50%61%54.3%±13.012% ▼
T20%69%65%66.4%±14.935% ▲

Optimal v Ekaterine Gorgodze: +0.5±1.3 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +12.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowClara winsv EkaterineMatchupOptimal
Wide40%66%65%65.5%±13.344% ▲
Body21%54%54%52.2%±14.15% ▼
T39%61%61%58.3%±13.651% ▲

Optimal v Ekaterine Gorgodze: +0.9±1.2 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +5.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ekaterine Gorgodze serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowEkaterine winsv ClaraMatchupOptimal
Wide27%56%63%53.2%±13.927%
Body42%55%53%50.6%±12.426% ▼
T31%63%61%55.4%±13.947% ▲

Optimal v Clara Burel: +0.6±1.3 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowEkaterine winsv ClaraMatchupOptimal
Wide48%61%56%51.2%±12.249%
Body36%45%48%37.6%±13.321% ▼
T15%64%59%59.2%±15.130% ▲

Optimal v Clara Burel: +0.9±1.3 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +11.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Clara Burel returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv EkaterineValue
FH through the middle51%+4.2+4.1+0.9+9.2±3.2
FH crosscourt23%+5.3+0.2+3.2+8.8±4.3
FH down the line18%+1.5−0.2+1.7+3.0±3.8
FH slice through the middle8%−6.7−0.9±0.0−7.6±1.4

Lean FH through the middle: +2.6±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (146 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv EkaterineValue
BH through the middle54%+6.0+0.9+1.7+8.6±3.0
BH crosscourt25%+7.7+1.8+3.3+12.9±3.6
BH slice through the middle11%−6.2−0.3±0.0−6.6±1.5
BH down the line10%+2.2+1.1+1.6+4.9±4.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.2±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (131 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv EkaterineValue
FH through the middle49%−3.2+1.3+0.5−1.3±2.9
FH crosscourt32%+0.5−1.7+1.5+0.4±3.8
FH down the line19%−0.6+2.9+1.3+3.6±3.4

Lean FH crosscourt: +0.2±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (47 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv EkaterineValue
BH through the middle59%−2.6−0.2+0.1−2.6±2.3
BH crosscourt31%+1.5−1.3+0.4+0.5±2.7
BH down the line10%−0.5−0.3±0.0−0.9±2.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.0±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (49 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Ekaterine Gorgodze returning

Not enough charted returns.

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Clara Burel

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · rally+10.1±4.9+6.7+3.4
FH to the middle · return+4.5±3.4+3.5+1.0
FH to their forehand · rally+2.1±4.3+1.2+0.8
FH to the middle · rally+0.9±3.0+0.5+0.4
BH to the middle · rally+0.7±2.9−0.5+1.2
BH to their forehand · rally−1.4±5.9−1.5+0.1

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · serve +1−5.0±5.6−1.6−3.4
BH to their forehand · rally−1.4±5.9−1.5+0.1
BH to the middle · rally+0.7±2.9−0.5+1.2
FH to the middle · rally+0.9±3.0+0.5+0.4
FH to their forehand · rally+2.1±4.3+1.2+0.8

Ekaterine Gorgodze

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · rally+0.9±3.0+1.0−0.1
FH to the middle · rally+0.3±3.2+0.5−0.2
FH to their forehand · rally−4.2±4.0−4.0−0.3
FH to their backhand · rally−5.0±4.5−2.0−3.1
BH to their backhand · rally−5.6±4.1−3.7−1.9

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · rally−5.6±4.1−3.7−1.9
FH to their backhand · rally−5.0±4.5−2.0−3.1
FH to their forehand · rally−4.2±4.0−4.0−0.3
FH to the middle · rally+0.3±3.2+0.5−0.2
BH to the middle · rally+0.9±3.0+1.0−0.1

Against Ekaterine Gorgodze-like opponents

Clara Burel vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–52.2%47.7%