Game plan
Hubert Hurkacz v Carlos Alcaraz
Every number combines what Hubert Hurkacz does well with what Carlos Alcaraz allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective
Forecast
Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. Both were charted enough in the last three seasons, so those carry the most weight. The result is then nudged by Hubert Hurkacz's record against Carlos Alcaraz's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +0.2 on serve, −0.8 on return vs expectation (4282 points); head-to-head: +2.6 on serve, −2.1 on return vs expectation (766 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.
Head to head, per 100 shots
| Career | Hubert | Carlos |
|---|---|---|
| Direction choice | +0.09 ±0.02 better than 79% | +0.08 ±0.03 better than 77% |
| Shot selection | +0.14 ±0.05 better than 68% | +0.20 ±0.07 better than 73% |
| Execution | −0.38 ±0.15 better than 49% | +0.54 ±0.21 better than 85% |
| Points left on the table | 2.49 ±0.04 lower than 62% | 2.43 ±0.05 lower than 70% |
Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.
Structural compatibility
Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Hubert Hurkacz −1.63, Carlos Alcaraz +0.37. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.
Serve plan
The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.
Hubert Hurkacz serving
Deuce court
| 1st serve | Now | Hubert wins | v Carlos | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 47% | 78% | 66% | 72.4%±1.7 | 60% ▲ |
| Body | 5% | 63% | 61% | 61.3%±4.7 | 0% ▼ |
| T | 48% | 80% | 68% | 73.4%±1.8 | 40% ▼ |
Optimal v Carlos Alcaraz: +0.4±0.3 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +1.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Ad court
| 1st serve | Now | Hubert wins | v Carlos | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 53% | 78% | 67% | 73.8%±1.7 | 66% ▲ |
| Body | 4% | 66% | 58% | 61.4%±5.1 | 0% ▼ |
| T | 42% | 76% | 65% | 69.5%±2.1 | 34% ▼ |
Optimal v Carlos Alcaraz: +0.3±0.3 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Carlos Alcaraz serving
Deuce court
| 1st serve | Now | Carlos wins | v Hubert | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 46% | 73% | 73% | 73.5%±1.7 | 46% |
| Body | 18% | 67% | 63% | 67.2%±3.4 | 4% ▼ |
| T | 37% | 77% | 77% | 78.8%±1.8 | 50% ▲ |
Optimal v Hubert Hurkacz: +0.7±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +4.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Ad court
| 1st serve | Now | Carlos wins | v Hubert | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 49% | 72% | 73% | 72.1%±1.9 | 50% |
| Body | 16% | 66% | 64% | 67.2%±3.7 | 3% ▼ |
| T | 34% | 72% | 73% | 73.7%±2.1 | 47% ▲ |
Optimal v Hubert Hurkacz: +0.6±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +1.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Return plan
Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.
Hubert Hurkacz returning
1st serve to the forehand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Carlos | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH through the middle | 44% | +4.3 | −0.4 | +0.5 | +4.3±0.9 |
| FH crosscourt | 24% | +5.5 | −2.3 | +0.8 | +4.0±1.8 |
| FH down the line | 21% | +1.7 | −2.0 | +1.0 | +0.7±1.9 |
| FH slice through the middle | 5% | −4.2 | −2.1 | −1.5 | −7.8±1.6 |
| FH slice crosscourt | 5% | −4.3 | −4.4 | −0.3 | −9.0±2.4 |
Lean FH through the middle: +2.4±0.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (6555 returns charted)
1st serve to the backhand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Carlos | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH through the middle | 34% | +6.4 | −0.2 | +0.4 | +6.6±0.9 |
| BH crosscourt | 26% | +8.8 | −0.1 | +0.7 | +9.3±1.2 |
| BH slice through the middle | 14% | −4.2 | −3.5 | −2.8 | −10.5±1.3 |
| BH down the line | 10% | +4.2 | −0.9 | +0.1 | +3.4±2.4 |
| BH slice crosscourt | 10% | +0.5 | −6.1 | −0.4 | −5.9±2.0 |
Lean BH crosscourt: +7.7±1.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (6287 returns charted)
2nd serve to the forehand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Carlos | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH through the middle | 44% | −3.5 | +1.4 | +0.1 | −2.0±1.4 |
| FH down the line | 26% | −1.8 | −1.5 | −2.0 | −5.3±2.9 |
| FH crosscourt | 26% | −0.2 | −3.3 | −1.0 | −4.6±2.8 |
| FH slice through the middle | 2% | −12.7 | −3.7 | −0.5 | −16.8±2.4 |
| FH slice crosscourt | 1% | −12.5 | −3.9 | −0.7 | −17.1±2.6 |
Lean FH through the middle: +2.1±1.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (1676 returns charted)
2nd serve to the backhand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Carlos | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH crosscourt | 42% | +1.0 | −1.1 | −0.2 | −0.3±1.1 |
| BH through the middle | 37% | −2.9 | ±0.0 | −1.2 | −4.1±0.9 |
| BH down the line | 14% | −0.2 | +0.5 | −1.6 | −1.3±2.9 |
| FH through the middle | 2% | −2.9 | −1.7 | +0.1 | −4.5±1.9 |
| BH slice through the middle | 1% | −11.3 | −1.4 | −3.6 | −16.3±2.4 |
Lean BH crosscourt: +2.0±0.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (3803 returns charted)
Carlos Alcaraz returning
1st serve to the forehand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Hubert | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH through the middle | 49% | +4.3 | +1.2 | −2.1 | +3.3±0.9 |
| FH crosscourt | 24% | +5.5 | +1.3 | −6.6 | +0.2±1.8 |
| FH down the line | 14% | +1.7 | +1.2 | −6.7 | −3.8±2.1 |
| FH slice through the middle | 8% | −4.2 | +0.2 | −2.8 | −6.8±1.3 |
| FH slice down the line | 2% | −4.3 | +0.8 | −7.6 | −11.1±2.6 |
Lean FH through the middle: +3.2±0.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (4205 returns charted)
1st serve to the backhand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Hubert | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH through the middle | 40% | +6.4 | +1.0 | −1.0 | +6.5±0.9 |
| BH crosscourt | 34% | +8.8 | +1.5 | −2.7 | +7.6±1.3 |
| BH slice through the middle | 10% | −4.2 | −2.3 | −4.9 | −11.4±1.3 |
| BH down the line | 7% | +4.2 | −0.5 | −5.6 | −1.8±2.7 |
| BH slice crosscourt | 6% | +0.5 | −1.3 | −6.9 | −7.6±1.9 |
Lean BH crosscourt: +4.8±1.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (4723 returns charted)
2nd serve to the forehand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Hubert | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH through the middle | 42% | −3.5 | −1.0 | −1.0 | −5.5±1.4 |
| FH crosscourt | 36% | −0.2 | −0.2 | −2.9 | −3.4±2.6 |
| FH down the line | 17% | −1.8 | −1.0 | −4.1 | −6.9±3.2 |
| FH slice through the middle | 2% | −12.7 | −0.8 | −3.7 | −17.1±2.2 |
| FH slice down the line | 1% | −9.4 | −1.6 | −0.6 | −11.6±2.9 |
Lean FH crosscourt: +1.8±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (1132 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)
2nd serve to the backhand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Hubert | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH crosscourt | 45% | +1.0 | +0.1 | −1.8 | −0.7±1.1 |
| BH through the middle | 27% | −2.9 | −2.1 | −0.7 | −5.7±1.0 |
| BH down the line | 9% | −0.2 | +1.4 | −5.0 | −3.8±3.1 |
| FH through the middle | 7% | −2.9 | ±0.0 | −1.0 | −3.9±1.5 |
| FH inside-in | 5% | +0.6 | −1.5 | −2.9 | −3.8±3.2 |
Lean BH crosscourt: +2.4±0.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (2787 returns charted)
Rally plan
Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.
Hubert Hurkacz
Favour
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| FH drop shot to their forehand · rally | +4.6±5.1 | +5.1 | −0.5 |
| BH slice to their forehand · serve +1 | +3.8±3.7 | +2.6 | +1.3 |
| Smash to their forehand · rally | +3.3±3.3 | +2.4 | +0.9 |
| FH to the middle · return | +1.4±0.7 | +0.3 | +1.1 |
| FH slice to their forehand · return +1 | +1.4±3.4 | +1.0 | +0.4 |
| FH lob to their backhand · rally | +1.0±4.3 | −0.4 | +1.4 |
Avoid
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH slice to their forehand · return | −11.5±2.7 | −9.9 | −1.6 |
| BH volley to their forehand · rally | −11.3±3.6 | −6.3 | −5.0 |
| BH drop shot to their forehand · serve +1 | −8.6±5.1 | −5.7 | −3.0 |
| FH volley to their forehand · rally | −8.5±3.5 | −2.1 | −6.4 |
| BH volley to their backhand · rally | −6.3±3.4 | −3.2 | −3.1 |
Carlos Alcaraz
Favour
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| FH drop shot to their forehand · rally | +6.0±4.9 | +6.3 | −0.3 |
| BH drop shot to their forehand · serve +1 | +5.2±5.0 | +1.3 | +3.8 |
| FH volley to the middle · rally | +5.1±5.2 | +5.3 | −0.3 |
| BH lob to their backhand · return +1 | +3.7±4.0 | +3.8 | −0.1 |
| FH volley to their forehand · serve +1 | +3.5±4.5 | +3.2 | +0.3 |
| BH lob to the middle · return +1 | +3.3±2.3 | +2.7 | +0.6 |
Avoid
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH slice to their forehand · return | −15.4±2.7 | −5.2 | −10.2 |
| FH slice to their backhand · return | −7.6±2.4 | −0.7 | −6.9 |
| BH slice to their backhand · return | −7.4±1.7 | −1.1 | −6.4 |
| FH to their backhand · return | −6.2±1.5 | −0.5 | −5.8 |
| BH slice to the middle · return | −6.2±1.2 | −1.7 | −4.5 |
Against Carlos Alcaraz-like opponents
| Hubert Hurkacz v | Matches | Serve pts won | Return pts won |
|---|---|---|---|
| All charted opponents | – | 68.3% | 34.4% |
| Players most similar to Carlos Alcaraz | 24 | 69.4% | 32.8% |
| Carlos Alcaraz (charted head-to-head) | 4 | 65.5% | 29.7% |
Similar by tactical fingerprint: Stefanos Tsitsipas, Ben Shelton, Fabian Marozsan, Tallon Griekspoor, Alejandro Tabilo, Pablo Carreno Busta, Zizou Bergs, Lorenzo Sonego, Francisco Cerundolo, Luca Nardi. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.