Game plan
Jannik Sinner v Richard Gasquet
Every number combines what Jannik Sinner does well with what Richard Gasquet allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective
Forecast
Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Jannik Sinner's record against Richard Gasquet's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +2.9 on serve, −3.3 on return vs expectation (5185 points); head-to-head: +2.6 on serve, +2.9 on return vs expectation (668 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.
Head to head, per 100 shots
| Career | Jannik | Richard |
|---|---|---|
| Direction choice | −0.07 ±0.02 better than 40% | +0.17 ±0.05 better than 91% |
| Shot selection | +0.50 ±0.04 better than 93% | −0.47 ±0.11 better than 12% |
| Execution | +0.25 ±0.16 better than 78% | +0.78 ±0.25 better than 91% |
| Points left on the table | 2.38 ±0.04 lower than 75% | 2.45 ±0.09 lower than 68% |
Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.
Structural compatibility
Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Jannik Sinner +1.26, Richard Gasquet −0.42. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.
Serve plan
The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.
Jannik Sinner serving
Deuce court
| 1st serve | Now | Jannik wins | v Richard | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 46% | 78% | 74% | 78.5%±2.2 | 44% ▼ |
| Body | 11% | 67% | 70% | 73.5%±4.6 | 0% ▼ |
| T | 43% | 78% | 78% | 81.6%±2.1 | 56% ▲ |
Optimal v Richard Gasquet: +0.5±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +2.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Ad court
| 1st serve | Now | Jannik wins | v Richard | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 58% | 76% | 78% | 81.0%±2.0 | 71% ▲ |
| Body | 7% | 68% | 63% | 68.0%±6.1 | 0% ▼ |
| T | 35% | 76% | 71% | 74.8%±2.8 | 29% ▼ |
Optimal v Richard Gasquet: +0.7±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +3.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Richard Gasquet serving
Deuce court
| 1st serve | Now | Richard wins | v Jannik | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 50% | 68% | 68% | 62.6%±2.6 | 42% ▼ |
| Body | 5% | 62% | 58% | 56.8%±6.7 | 0% ▼ |
| T | 45% | 75% | 72% | 72.2%±2.7 | 58% ▲ |
Optimal v Jannik Sinner: +0.4±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +5.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Ad court
| 1st serve | Now | Richard wins | v Jannik | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 52% | 71% | 69% | 67.7%±2.8 | 44% ▼ |
| Body | 5% | 56% | 59% | 51.8%±7.3 | 0% ▼ |
| T | 43% | 69% | 66% | 63.3%±3.0 | 56% ▲ |
Optimal v Jannik Sinner: +0.6±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +2.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Return plan
Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.
Jannik Sinner returning
1st serve to the forehand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Richard | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH through the middle | 57% | +4.3 | +1.3 | +1.1 | +6.7±1.1 |
| FH crosscourt | 23% | +5.5 | +0.2 | +4.6 | +10.3±2.2 |
| FH down the line | 16% | +1.7 | −0.1 | +2.1 | +3.7±2.5 |
| FH slice through the middle | 2% | −4.2 | −4.2 | +0.7 | −7.7±2.1 |
| FH slice crosscourt | 1% | −4.3 | −1.8 | +1.5 | −4.6±2.8 |
Lean FH crosscourt: +3.6±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (5521 returns charted)
1st serve to the backhand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Richard | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH through the middle | 44% | +6.4 | +0.1 | +0.5 | +7.0±1.2 |
| BH crosscourt | 29% | +8.8 | −0.6 | +2.1 | +10.3±1.8 |
| BH down the line | 10% | +4.2 | +0.3 | +1.9 | +6.4±3.4 |
| BH slice through the middle | 9% | −4.2 | −6.9 | +1.6 | −9.5±1.6 |
| BH slice crosscourt | 5% | +0.5 | −7.2 | +3.4 | −3.2±2.4 |
Lean BH crosscourt: +5.1±1.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (5508 returns charted)
2nd serve to the forehand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Richard | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH through the middle | 58% | −3.5 | +0.5 | ±0.0 | −3.0±1.8 |
| FH crosscourt | 24% | −0.2 | +0.5 | +1.5 | +1.8±3.5 |
| FH down the line | 18% | −1.8 | −1.3 | +1.6 | −1.4±3.9 |
| BH through the middle | 0% | +0.1 | +0.6 | +1.0 | +1.8±1.1 |
Lean FH crosscourt: +3.4±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (1459 returns charted)
2nd serve to the backhand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Richard | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH through the middle | 45% | −2.9 | +0.6 | +1.0 | −1.3±1.0 |
| BH crosscourt | 43% | +1.0 | −0.4 | +2.0 | +2.7±1.5 |
| BH down the line | 7% | −0.2 | +1.3 | −0.1 | +1.0±3.6 |
| FH through the middle | 3% | −2.9 | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | −2.9±2.1 |
| FH inside-in | 1% | +0.6 | +0.2 | +1.5 | +2.2±4.2 |
| FH inside-out | 1% | +1.0 | +1.0 | +1.6 | +3.6±3.5 |
Lean FH inside-out: +3.0±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (3318 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)
Richard Gasquet returning
1st serve to the forehand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Jannik | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH through the middle | 49% | +4.3 | −0.4 | −1.6 | +2.2±1.2 |
| FH crosscourt | 28% | +5.5 | −2.1 | −1.6 | +1.8±2.3 |
| FH down the line | 17% | +1.7 | +3.3 | −4.4 | +0.7±2.8 |
| FH slice through the middle | 4% | −4.2 | +2.2 | −1.1 | −3.2±1.9 |
| FH slice down the line | 1% | −4.3 | +2.2 | −5.4 | −7.5±2.6 |
Lean FH through the middle: +0.7±1.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (1536 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)
1st serve to the backhand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Jannik | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH slice through the middle | 30% | −4.2 | +3.4 | −3.3 | −4.1±1.3 |
| BH slice crosscourt | 22% | +0.5 | +1.1 | −4.0 | −2.4±1.9 |
| BH crosscourt | 18% | +8.8 | −1.0 | −1.2 | +6.6±2.0 |
| BH through the middle | 18% | +6.4 | −2.2 | −0.8 | +3.5±1.6 |
| BH slice down the line | 6% | −8.4 | +2.3 | −7.5 | −13.6±3.1 |
Lean BH crosscourt: +7.4±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (1628 returns charted)
2nd serve to the forehand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Jannik | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH through the middle | 42% | −3.5 | +0.4 | −1.0 | −4.0±1.9 |
| FH crosscourt | 37% | −0.2 | −2.2 | −1.6 | −4.0±3.1 |
| FH down the line | 17% | −1.8 | +3.8 | −3.0 | −1.0±3.7 |
| BH through the middle | 2% | +0.1 | +0.6 | −0.5 | +0.1±1.1 |
| FH slice through the middle | 1% | −12.7 | +0.3 | −0.5 | −12.9±2.0 |
Lean FH down the line: +2.6±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (364 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)
2nd serve to the backhand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Jannik | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH crosscourt | 36% | +1.0 | +0.4 | −2.0 | −0.6±1.6 |
| BH through the middle | 27% | −2.9 | ±0.0 | −0.5 | −3.4±1.3 |
| BH slice crosscourt | 15% | −4.0 | −0.4 | −5.8 | −10.3±2.3 |
| BH slice through the middle | 11% | −11.3 | +0.7 | −4.1 | −14.7±2.3 |
| BH down the line | 7% | −0.2 | +2.2 | −1.3 | +0.7±4.0 |
Lean BH down the line: +5.1±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (1238 returns charted)
Rally plan
Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.
Jannik Sinner
Favour
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| FH volley to their forehand · rally | +7.3±4.4 | +0.9 | +6.4 |
| FH to their forehand · return | +6.3±2.1 | +1.5 | +4.8 |
| BH to their forehand · return +1 | +4.2±2.7 | +2.3 | +2.0 |
| FH to the middle · return | +3.6±0.9 | +1.5 | +2.1 |
| FH to their backhand · serve +1 | +3.1±1.3 | +1.8 | +1.4 |
| BH to their forehand · rally | +2.9±1.5 | +1.8 | +1.1 |
Avoid
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH slice to their forehand · return | −7.9±3.2 | −7.3 | −0.6 |
| BH slice to their forehand · rally | −7.2±2.7 | −3.8 | −3.4 |
| BH slice to the middle · return | −5.1±1.5 | −6.0 | +0.9 |
| BH slice to their backhand · serve +1 | −4.9±2.8 | −5.0 | +0.1 |
| BH slice to their forehand · return +1 | −4.8±3.4 | −4.7 | −0.1 |
Richard Gasquet
Favour
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| FH volley to their forehand · serve +1 | +4.4±5.2 | +2.7 | +1.7 |
| BH volley to the middle · rally | +3.7±5.0 | +1.9 | +1.8 |
| FH slice to the middle · rally | +3.2±1.9 | +2.7 | +0.6 |
| BH volley to their backhand · serve +1 | +2.9±4.9 | +1.2 | +1.7 |
| BH to their backhand · rally | +2.6±0.7 | +2.6 | ±0.0 |
| FH slice to the middle · return +1 | +2.0±2.6 | +3.1 | −1.1 |
Avoid
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH slice to their forehand · return | −4.9±3.0 | +2.3 | −7.2 |
| BH slice to their backhand · return | −4.0±1.6 | +0.2 | −4.2 |
| BH volley to their backhand · rally | −4.0±4.8 | −0.8 | −3.2 |
| BH slice to their backhand · serve +1 | −3.9±2.4 | −1.1 | −2.8 |
| FH to their backhand · return +1 | −3.6±2.1 | −0.3 | −3.3 |
Against Richard Gasquet-like opponents
| Jannik Sinner v | Matches | Serve pts won | Return pts won |
|---|---|---|---|
| All charted opponents | – | 68.1% | 40.7% |
| Players most similar to Richard Gasquet | 29 | 67.4% | 35.2% |
| Richard Gasquet (charted head-to-head) | 4 | 71.3% | 44.0% |
Similar by tactical fingerprint: Learner Tien, Daniil Medvedev, Novak Djokovic, Karen Khachanov, Nishesh Basavareddy, Benjamin Bonzi, Andy Murray, Marcos Baghdatis, David Nalbandian, Ivan Ljubicic. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.