RallyIQ

Game plan

Jesper De Jong v Karim Mohamed Maamoun

Every number combines what Jesper De Jong does well with what Karim Mohamed Maamoun allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Jesper De Jong wins, best of 3 79%90%: 59%–91% · best of 5: 84%
Serve points won 62.6% / 56.5% Jesper / Karim · tour 61.3%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 80%serve 62.5% / 56.0%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Jesper De Jong's record against Karim Mohamed Maamoun's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +0.2 on serve, −5.6 on return vs expectation (269 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerJesperKarim
Direction choice−0.14 ±0.06
better than 21%
−0.08 ±0.10
better than 37%
Shot selection+0.30 ±0.12
better than 80%
−0.54 ±0.09
better than 11%
Execution−0.72 ±0.35
better than 36%
−1.83 ±0.36
better than 5%
Points left on the table2.79 ±0.11
lower than 32%
2.38 ±0.12
lower than 76%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Jesper De Jong serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowJesper winsv KarimMatchupOptimal
Wide44%73%74%74.2%±4.739% ▼
Body7%54%62%53.5%±10.10% ▼
T48%81%72%78.7%±4.661% ▲

Optimal v Karim Mohamed Maamoun: +0.5±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +3.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowJesper winsv KarimMatchupOptimal
Wide44%73%72%71.8%±4.957% ▲
Body9%56%60%52.7%±11.70% ▼
T47%71%71%70.0%±5.543% ▼

Optimal v Karim Mohamed Maamoun: +0.7±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +2.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Karim Mohamed Maamoun serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowKarim winsv JesperMatchupOptimal
Wide37%68%72%67.4%±5.450% ▲
Body9%69%64%69.9%±8.59%
T54%64%75%64.5%±5.241% ▼

Optimal v Jesper De Jong: +0.3±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving body every time would read +3.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowKarim winsv JesperMatchupOptimal
Wide50%64%73%65.0%±5.463% ▲
Body7%63%58%57.3%±10.67%
T43%67%64%58.5%±6.130% ▼

Optimal v Jesper De Jong: +0.1±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Jesper De Jong returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KarimValue
FH through the middle50%+4.3−0.1−0.5+3.7±2.0
FH down the line18%+1.7−1.9+0.6+0.4±4.3
FH crosscourt15%+5.5+0.1−4.2+1.3±4.2
FH slice through the middle12%−4.2−2.1±0.0−6.2±2.3
FH slice down the line5%−4.3−0.9−0.8−6.0±2.7

Lean FH through the middle: +2.7±1.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (543 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KarimValue
BH through the middle37%+6.4−0.2+2.1+8.3±1.9
BH slice through the middle18%−4.2−1.3+2.0−3.5±2.3
BH crosscourt18%+8.8−2.8−1.7+4.4±3.0
BH down the line15%+4.2−1.5+0.2+2.9±4.5
BH slice crosscourt8%+0.5−0.8−0.1−0.4±3.0

Lean BH through the middle: +5.2±1.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (672 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KarimValue
FH through the middle61%−3.5−0.7−1.2−5.4±2.5
FH crosscourt21%−0.2−0.4+0.9+0.2±4.4
FH down the line18%−1.8+0.7+0.4−0.8±4.6

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.6±3.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (156 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KarimValue
BH through the middle43%−2.9±0.0−0.5−3.4±1.9
BH crosscourt26%+1.0−0.9−1.7−1.6±2.8
FH through the middle11%−2.9+0.9−1.2−3.2±2.2
FH inside-out8%+1.0+2.1+0.4+3.4±3.6
BH down the line7%−0.2−2.4−1.1−3.7±4.9

Lean FH inside-out: +5.8±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (442 returns charted)

Karim Mohamed Maamoun returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JesperValue
FH through the middle40%+4.3−3.2+0.2+1.2±2.3
FH crosscourt23%+5.5−3.2−3.4−1.1±4.1
FH slice through the middle19%−4.2−1.8−1.0−7.0±2.3
FH down the line9%+1.7−7.8−2.4−8.5±4.3
FH slice crosscourt7%−4.3−1.8−0.8−6.9±2.4

Lean FH through the middle: +3.7±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (633 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JesperValue
BH through the middle46%+6.4+0.1−2.1+4.4±2.0
BH crosscourt38%+8.8−1.9−1.4+5.5±2.8
BH down the line7%+4.2−0.3+0.1+4.0±4.5
BH slice through the middle5%−4.2+0.9−2.3−5.7±2.5
BH slice crosscourt3%+0.5−0.1−5.2−4.8±2.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.5±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (740 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JesperValue
FH through the middle42%−3.5−3.5−0.8−7.8±2.5
FH crosscourt40%−0.2−4.7+0.2−4.8±4.3
FH down the line8%−1.8+1.8−2.4−2.4±4.1
FH slice through the middle7%−12.7−1.3±0.0−14.0±1.3
FH slice crosscourt3%−12.5−0.1±0.0−12.6±1.4

Lean FH down the line: +4.3±4.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (183 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JesperValue
BH crosscourt55%+1.0+0.5−0.3+1.2±2.6
BH through the middle39%−2.9−0.6−1.1−4.6±2.0
BH down the line4%−0.2−0.8−1.0−2.0±4.7
FH through the middle1%−2.9+0.2−0.8−3.5±1.7

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.5±1.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (500 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on clay. Each player's clay record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Jesper De Jong

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · return +1+4.2±3.4+3.4+0.8
BH slice to the middle · return+3.6±3.2−0.7+4.3
FH to their backhand · serve +1+2.5±3.0+2.6−0.1
BH to the middle · return+1.8±1.8+0.5+1.3
BH to their backhand · rally+1.7±1.9+1.4+0.4
BH to their forehand · rally+0.9±4.3+0.7+0.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to their forehand · rally−8.9±5.0−5.3−3.6
FH to their forehand · return−6.4±5.2−0.9−5.5
BH to their forehand · return +1−5.3±6.5−0.4−4.9
BH to their backhand · return−3.2±2.8−1.7−1.5
FH to their forehand · serve +1−3.0±3.9+0.3−3.3

Karim Mohamed Maamoun

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · serve +1+3.6±6.3+6.9−3.3
BH to their forehand · return+3.2±5.4+2.4+0.9
BH to the middle · rally+1.4±1.8−1.2+2.7
BH to their forehand · return +1+0.8±6.7+5.0−4.2
BH to the middle · serve +1+0.1±2.8−0.6+0.8
BH to their backhand · return +1−0.5±3.2+0.4−0.9

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to the middle · rally−6.7±3.0−3.6−3.1
FH to their backhand · return−6.5±4.6−5.8−0.6
FH to their forehand · return−5.4±4.9−3.5−1.9
BH slice to their backhand · rally−4.4±3.1−2.9−1.5
BH slice to their backhand · return +1−4.2±4.0−2.5−1.6

Against Karim Mohamed Maamoun-like opponents

Jesper De Jong vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–63.5%37.3%
Players most similar to Karim Mohamed Maamoun2 61.5%29.7%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Jannik Sinner, Flavio Cobolli, Gael Monfils, Botic Van De Zandschulp, Yannick Hanfmann, Luca Nardi, Mackenzie Mcdonald, Andreas Seppi, Guido Pella. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.