Game plan

Linda Noskova v Zeynep Sonmez

Every number combines what Linda Noskova does well with what Zeynep Sonmez allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Linda Noskova wins, best of 3 91%90%: 65%–99% · best of 5: 95%

Serve points won 64.7% / 54.5% Linda / Zeynep · tour 58.1%

Strengths only, no similarity priors 91%serve 64.7% / 54.5%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Linda Noskova's record against Zeynep Sonmez's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads. A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

Career	Linda	Zeynep
Direction choice	+0.14 ±0.05 better than 79%	−0.39 ±0.12 better than 2%
Shot selection	−0.07 ±0.09 better than 39%	+1.00 ±0.15 better than 100%
Execution	+0.02 ±0.49 better than 62%	−2.07 ±0.59 better than 4%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Linda Noskova serving

Deuce court

1st serve	Now	Linda wins	v Zeynep	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	39%	70%	67%	71.0%±7.3	55% ▲
Body	10%	57%	59%	58.6%±11.7	0% ▼
T	50%	73%	70%	74.6%±8.6	45% ▼

Optimal v Zeynep Sonmez: +1.0±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +3.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serve	Now	Linda wins	v Zeynep	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	49%	72%	72%	78.1%±7.2	64% ▲
Body	8%	52%	54%	49.8%±12.7	0% ▼
T	42%	68%	65%	68.7%±8.9	36% ▼

Optimal v Zeynep Sonmez: +1.1±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +6.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Zeynep Sonmez serving

Deuce court

1st serve	Now	Zeynep wins	v Linda	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	52%	63%	65%	62.2%±8.9	52%
Body	37%	55%	57%	54.8%±10.0	22% ▼
T	11%	63%	74%	69.7%±12.4	26% ▲

Optimal v Linda Noskova: +0.9±1.1 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +9.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serve	Now	Zeynep wins	v Linda	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	29%	60%	70%	64.8%±10.1	44% ▲
Body	25%	51%	58%	52.8%±12.0	10% ▼
T	46%	63%	66%	65.0%±9.4	46%

Optimal v Linda Noskova: +0.8±1.1 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +3.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Linda Noskova returning

1st serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Zeynep	Value
FH through the middle	40%	+4.2	+2.7	−1.0	+5.8±2.7
FH down the line	19%	+1.5	±0.0	−0.8	+0.7±4.4
FH crosscourt	16%	+5.3	+0.3	+2.7	+8.3±4.2
FH slice through the middle	15%	−6.7	+1.2	+0.5	−5.1±2.3
FH slice crosscourt	8%	−6.6	−0.6	±0.0	−7.3±2.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +6.2±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (714 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Zeynep	Value
BH through the middle	41%	+6.0	−0.9	−0.5	+4.6±2.6
BH crosscourt	25%	+7.7	−0.7	−2.1	+4.9±3.3
BH down the line	12%	+2.2	−3.7	+2.8	+1.3±4.2
BH slice through the middle	11%	−6.2	−1.3	−0.3	−7.9±2.1
BH slice crosscourt	8%	−4.2	−1.9	±0.0	−6.1±2.2

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.5±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (631 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Zeynep	Value
FH through the middle	44%	−3.2	−2.0	+0.4	−4.8±3.0
FH crosscourt	27%	+0.5	+0.3	+1.3	+2.1±4.4
FH down the line	25%	−0.6	−5.0	+0.7	−4.8±5.1
FH slice crosscourt	4%	−14.9	−0.6	±0.0	−15.5±1.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.4±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (197 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Zeynep	Value
BH crosscourt	39%	+1.5	−1.9	+0.1	−0.3±3.5
BH through the middle	32%	−2.6	+0.9	−0.2	−1.9±2.7
BH down the line	26%	−0.5	+2.2	+0.5	+2.2±4.8
FH through the middle	3%	−2.7	−0.6	+0.4	−2.9±2.3

Lean BH down the line: +2.4±3.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (338 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Zeynep Sonmez returning

1st serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Linda	Value
FH through the middle	56%	+4.2	−0.1	+0.6	+4.6±2.6
FH crosscourt	24%	+5.3	+0.3	−0.5	+5.2±3.9
FH down the line	20%	+1.5	−0.5	−1.1	−0.1±4.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.3±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (117 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Linda	Value
BH through the middle	55%	+6.0	+0.6	−0.4	+6.2±2.5
BH down the line	25%	+2.2	−2.2	+4.4	+4.3±4.2
BH crosscourt	21%	+7.7	+1.9	−0.6	+9.1±3.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.8±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (73 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Linda Noskova

Favour

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
FH to their forehand · serve +1	+4.2±5.8	+4.5	−0.3
FH to their backhand · serve +1	+2.2±6.1	+2.2	±0.0
FH to the middle · rally	+1.1±3.8	+1.1	±0.0
BH to their backhand · rally	+0.6±4.9	+0.2	+0.4
BH to the middle · return	−0.6±3.8	±0.0	−0.6
BH to their backhand · return	−0.8±5.0	+0.8	−1.5

Avoid

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
FH to their backhand · rally	−6.9±5.9	−6.5	−0.4
FH to their forehand · rally	−3.2±5.3	−3.1	−0.1
BH to the middle · rally	−2.5±3.5	−2.8	+0.3
FH to the middle · return	−1.5±4.1	±0.0	−1.6
BH to their backhand · return	−0.8±5.0	+0.8	−1.5

Zeynep Sonmez

Favour

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
FH to the middle · return	+1.9±4.1	+2.2	−0.3
BH to the middle · serve +1	+0.8±3.8	+0.6	+0.2
BH to their backhand · rally	−0.1±5.0	+1.3	−1.5
FH to their backhand · serve +1	−0.9±5.9	−0.1	−0.8
FH to their forehand · rally	−1.2±5.4	−2.3	+1.1
BH to the middle · return	−1.4±3.7	−0.1	−1.3

Avoid

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
BH to their forehand · rally	−8.7±6.7	−4.6	−4.0
FH to the middle · rally	−3.8±3.7	−0.4	−3.4
FH to their backhand · return	−3.3±6.3	−0.5	−2.8
FH to their backhand · rally	−2.9±5.8	−1.5	−1.4
BH to the middle · rally	−1.9±3.4	−0.9	−1.0

Against Zeynep Sonmez-like opponents

Linda Noskova v	Matches	Serve pts won	Return pts won
All charted opponents	–	59.6%	40.2%