Game plan

Lindsay Davenport v Venus Williams

Every number combines what Lindsay Davenport does well with what Venus Williams allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Lindsay Davenport wins, best of 3 52%90%: 37%–67% · best of 5: 53%

Serve points won 57.3% / 56.8% Lindsay / Venus · tour 56.4%

Strengths only, no similarity priors 60%serve 57.8% / 55.9%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Lindsay Davenport's record against Venus Williams's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +5.4 on serve, −5.9 on return vs expectation (207 points); head-to-head: −4.9 on serve, −2.7 on return vs expectation (710 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

Career	Lindsay	Venus
Direction choice	+0.45 ±0.06 better than 98%	−0.04 ±0.07 better than 47%
Shot selection	+0.31 ±0.10 better than 79%	+0.66 ±0.09 better than 98%
Execution	−0.13 ±0.28 better than 55%	−0.28 ±0.26 better than 45%
Points left on the table	2.18 ±0.10 lower than 95%	2.52 ±0.09 lower than 63%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Lindsay Davenport serving

Deuce court

1st serve	Now	Lindsay wins	v Venus	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	44%	66%	65%	65.2%±4.3	37% ▼
Body	8%	57%	56%	55.3%±8.1	0% ▼
T	48%	66%	67%	65.3%±4.6	63% ▲

Optimal v Venus Williams: +0.5±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +0.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serve	Now	Lindsay wins	v Venus	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	42%	70%	64%	69.0%±4.8	32% ▼
Body	5%	57%	59%	59.5%±10.0	0% ▼
T	53%	67%	67%	68.6%±4.1	68% ▲

Optimal v Venus Williams: +0.4±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +0.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Venus Williams serving

Deuce court

1st serve	Now	Venus wins	v Lindsay	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	36%	68%	66%	68.2%±4.2	51% ▲
Body	28%	62%	60%	64.9%±6.2	24% ▼
T	36%	71%	66%	68.7%±4.8	25% ▼

Optimal v Lindsay Davenport: +0.1±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serve	Now	Venus wins	v Lindsay	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	28%	72%	68%	73.7%±4.8	43% ▲
Body	33%	61%	56%	60.8%±6.5	28% ▼
T	39%	64%	62%	61.0%±4.6	29% ▼

Optimal v Lindsay Davenport: +0.5±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +9.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Lindsay Davenport returning

1st serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Venus	Value
FH through the middle	46%	+4.2	−1.1	−1.7	+1.4±1.8
FH crosscourt	40%	+5.3	+0.6	−2.7	+3.2±2.9
FH down the line	13%	+1.5	−2.4	−1.3	−2.1±3.8
BH through the middle	2%	+5.2	−0.3	−2.1	+2.8±1.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.5±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (817 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Venus	Value
BH through the middle	57%	+6.0	−3.2	−2.1	+0.7±1.7
BH crosscourt	32%	+7.7	−1.5	−0.3	+5.9±2.8
BH down the line	8%	+2.2	+0.2	−3.9	−1.5±4.0
BH slice through the middle	2%	−6.2	−2.0	−1.5	−9.7±2.2
BH slice crosscourt	1%	−4.2	+1.5	−2.4	−5.1±2.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.1±2.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (569 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Venus	Value
FH crosscourt	41%	+0.5	−1.9	−1.1	−2.4±3.4
FH through the middle	35%	−3.2	−0.6	−0.5	−4.3±2.4
FH down the line	22%	−0.6	−1.9	+0.2	−2.2±4.4
BH through the middle	2%	−1.0	+0.5	+0.8	+0.4±1.6

Lean FH down the line: +0.8±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (332 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Venus	Value
BH crosscourt	50%	+1.5	+0.7	+2.8	+4.9±2.9
BH through the middle	30%	−2.6	−2.2	+0.8	−4.0±2.3
BH down the line	19%	−0.5	+1.3	−0.5	+0.3±4.7

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.6±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (310 returns charted)

Venus Williams returning

1st serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Lindsay	Value
FH through the middle	57%	+4.2	−1.7	−2.1	+0.3±1.8
FH crosscourt	23%	+5.3	−2.5	+1.1	+3.9±3.5
FH down the line	18%	+1.5	+0.8	+0.8	+3.1±3.5
BH through the middle	1%	+5.2	+0.4	−2.6	+3.0±2.4
BH inside-in	0%	+7.3	+0.9	−3.6	+4.6±2.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.2±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (1680 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Lindsay	Value
BH through the middle	54%	+6.0	−0.4	−2.6	+3.0±1.9
BH crosscourt	24%	+7.7	+1.3	−3.6	+5.4±3.0
BH down the line	14%	+2.2	+1.4	+0.7	+4.3±4.2
BH slice through the middle	3%	−6.2	−0.2	+1.7	−4.7±2.3
BH slice crosscourt	2%	−4.2	−2.5	+1.5	−5.2±2.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.2±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (1311 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Lindsay	Value
FH through the middle	49%	−3.2	±0.0	−0.7	−3.9±2.5
FH crosscourt	24%	+0.5	−1.3	−0.5	−1.2±4.2
FH down the line	23%	−0.6	+0.4	+1.4	+1.2±4.9
BH through the middle	3%	−1.0	−1.6	+0.2	−2.3±2.0
BH inside-in	1%	+2.0	+1.3	−2.4	+0.9±2.8

Lean FH down the line: +3.2±4.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (554 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Lindsay	Value
BH crosscourt	43%	+1.5	−1.1	−2.4	−2.0±2.8
BH through the middle	41%	−2.6	−2.3	+0.2	−4.7±2.1
BH down the line	15%	−0.5	+4.3	+2.8	+6.6±5.0

Lean BH down the line: +8.4±4.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (596 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.