RallyIQ

Game plan

Mackenzie Mcdonald v Karim Mohamed Maamoun

Every number combines what Mackenzie Mcdonald does well with what Karim Mohamed Maamoun allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Mackenzie Mcdonald wins, best of 3 83%90%: 65%–93% · best of 5: 88%
Serve points won 65.3% / 57.9% Mackenzie / Karim · tour 63.8%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 81%serve 65.4% / 58.4%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Mackenzie Mcdonald's record against Karim Mohamed Maamoun's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −0.7 on serve, +2.3 on return vs expectation (834 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerMackenzieKarim
Direction choice−0.20 ±0.11
better than 13%
−0.08 ±0.10
better than 37%
Shot selection+0.48 ±0.12
better than 91%
−0.54 ±0.09
better than 11%
Execution−0.70 ±0.58
better than 37%
−1.83 ±0.36
better than 5%
Points left on the table2.79 ±0.14
lower than 31%
2.38 ±0.12
lower than 76%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Mackenzie Mcdonald serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMackenzie winsv KarimMatchupOptimal
Wide37%65%74%66.1%±5.550% ▲
Body8%60%62%59.4%±10.40% ▼
T55%73%72%69.4%±5.450% ▼

Optimal v Karim Mohamed Maamoun: +0.6±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMackenzie winsv KarimMatchupOptimal
Wide49%68%72%67.2%±5.462% ▲
Body5%64%60%60.6%±12.55%
T46%62%71%60.3%±6.233% ▼

Optimal v Karim Mohamed Maamoun: +0.4±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Karim Mohamed Maamoun serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowKarim winsv MackenzieMatchupOptimal
Wide37%68%78%73.6%±5.350% ▲
Body9%69%62%68.4%±9.29%
T54%64%78%67.6%±5.641% ▼

Optimal v Mackenzie Mcdonald: +0.5±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowKarim winsv MackenzieMatchupOptimal
Wide50%64%79%71.4%±5.537% ▼
Body7%63%70%69.7%±9.67%
T43%67%75%70.3%±5.956% ▲

Optimal v Mackenzie Mcdonald: +0.1±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +0.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Mackenzie Mcdonald returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KarimValue
FH through the middle48%+4.3+1.1−0.5+4.9±2.2
FH crosscourt19%+5.5−2.6−4.2−1.3±4.2
FH down the line19%+1.7+0.3+0.6+2.6±4.4
FH slice through the middle10%−4.2+1.2±0.0−3.0±2.3
FH slice crosscourt2%−4.3+2.4±0.0−2.0±1.5

Lean FH through the middle: +2.8±1.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (419 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KarimValue
BH through the middle51%+6.4+2.4+2.1+10.9±1.9
BH down the line18%+4.2−2.5+0.2+1.9±4.5
BH crosscourt17%+8.8+1.1−1.7+8.2±3.1
BH slice through the middle9%−4.2−0.6+2.0−2.8±2.4
BH slice crosscourt2%+0.5−2.8−0.1−2.4±2.7

Lean BH through the middle: +4.1±1.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (509 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KarimValue
FH through the middle59%−3.5+0.3−1.2−4.4±2.6
FH crosscourt25%−0.2−1.7+0.9−1.1±4.3
FH down the line16%−1.8+1.3+0.4−0.1±4.3

Lean FH down the line: +2.8±4.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (99 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KarimValue
BH through the middle46%−2.9−0.9−0.5−4.3±1.9
BH crosscourt29%+1.0−0.4−1.7−1.1±2.9
BH down the line15%−0.2+0.7−1.1−0.7±5.0
FH through the middle7%−2.9+1.3−1.2−2.8±2.1
FH inside-out2%+1.0−0.5+0.4+0.8±3.1

Lean BH down the line: +1.9±4.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (362 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Karim Mohamed Maamoun returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MackenzieValue
FH through the middle40%+4.3−3.2+0.9+1.9±2.2
FH crosscourt23%+5.5−3.2+2.3+4.7±4.0
FH slice through the middle19%−4.2−1.8+2.7−3.3±2.2
FH down the line9%+1.7−7.8+1.4−4.8±4.4
FH slice crosscourt7%−4.3−1.8+0.2−5.9±2.4

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.4±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (633 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MackenzieValue
BH through the middle46%+6.4+0.1+0.3+6.8±2.0
BH crosscourt38%+8.8−1.9−0.2+6.7±2.8
BH down the line7%+4.2−0.3−1.3+2.6±4.6
BH slice through the middle5%−4.2+0.9+0.9−2.4±2.5
BH slice crosscourt3%+0.5−0.1−0.3+0.1±2.9

Lean BH through the middle: +1.0±1.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (740 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MackenzieValue
FH through the middle42%−3.5−3.5+0.7−6.3±2.6
FH crosscourt40%−0.2−4.7+2.3−2.6±4.4
FH down the line8%−1.8+1.8+0.2+0.2±4.3
FH slice through the middle7%−12.7−1.3+0.1−13.8±1.7
FH slice crosscourt3%−12.5−0.1±0.0−12.6±1.4

Lean FH down the line: +5.2±4.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (183 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MackenzieValue
BH crosscourt55%+1.0+0.5+0.4+1.9±2.6
BH through the middle39%−2.9−0.6−0.2−3.6±2.1
BH down the line4%−0.2−0.8+2.3+1.3±4.8
FH through the middle1%−2.9+0.2+0.7−2.0±1.8

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.3±1.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (500 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Mackenzie Mcdonald

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return+4.2±1.9+1.5+2.7
BH slice to the middle · rally+2.3±2.8+0.5+1.7
BH to their forehand · return+1.5±5.7+0.9+0.6
BH to the middle · serve +1+1.3±3.1+1.5−0.2
FH to the middle · serve +1+0.9±2.8+1.4−0.5
FH to their forehand · return +1+0.6±5.0+0.5+0.1

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · serve +1−7.5±6.7−5.3−2.1
BH to their forehand · return +1−6.5±6.9−3.7−2.8
BH to the middle · return +1−4.8±2.8−1.8−3.1
FH to their forehand · rally−4.5±2.7−3.9−0.6
FH to their backhand · return +1−4.2±5.0−1.3−2.9

Karim Mohamed Maamoun

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · serve +1+6.1±6.6+1.8+4.3
FH to their forehand · return +1+4.6±4.9+1.8+2.9
BH to their forehand · return+4.6±5.8+4.0+0.6
BH to their forehand · return +1+1.6±7.0+2.4−0.8
FH to their backhand · serve +1+1.3±3.6−2.9+4.2
BH to the middle · return+1.3±2.2−0.2+1.5

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return−7.0±5.2−9.1+2.2
FH to the middle · rally−4.0±1.9−3.5−0.5
FH to their backhand · return +1−3.6±4.8−6.6+3.0
FH to the middle · return−3.5±2.4−4.3+0.8
BH to the middle · rally−3.4±1.8−1.8−1.5

Against Karim Mohamed Maamoun-like opponents

Mackenzie Mcdonald vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–60.5%33.3%
Players most similar to Karim Mohamed Maamoun4 57.2%33.1%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Jesper De Jong, Jannik Sinner, Flavio Cobolli, Gael Monfils, Botic Van De Zandschulp, Yannick Hanfmann, Luca Nardi, Andreas Seppi, Guido Pella. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.