RallyIQ

Game plan

Maja Chwalinska v Evgeniya Rodina

Every number combines what Maja Chwalinska does well with what Evgeniya Rodina allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Maja Chwalinska serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMaja winsv EvgeniyaMatchupOptimal
Wide26%62%68%63.8%±13.341% ▲
Body28%55%57%54.5%±14.913% ▼
T46%65%62%58.9%±13.446%

Optimal v Evgeniya Rodina: +0.7±1.3 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +4.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMaja winsv EvgeniyaMatchupOptimal
Wide53%60%66%60.8%±12.552%
Body22%53%59%55.0%±15.87% ▼
T26%67%66%68.1%±12.941% ▲

Optimal v Evgeniya Rodina: +0.9±1.3 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +6.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Evgeniya Rodina serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowEvgeniya winsv MajaMatchupOptimal
Wide39%59%58%50.5%±12.339%
Body53%60%57%58.9%±12.138% ▼
T8%67%62%60.4%±16.223% ▲

Optimal v Maja Chwalinska: +0.2±1.3 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +4.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowEvgeniya winsv MajaMatchupOptimal
Wide8%64%59%56.6%±16.79%
Body46%52%53%49.0%±12.331% ▼
T45%59%58%52.6%±11.860% ▲

Optimal v Maja Chwalinska: +0.5±1.2 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +5.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Maja Chwalinska returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv EvgeniyaValue
FH through the middle41%+4.2+3.2−0.3+7.0±3.2
FH crosscourt21%+5.3+3.3−0.8+7.7±4.2
FH slice through the middle17%−6.7+1.6±0.0−5.2±1.6
FH down the line14%+1.5+1.1−0.1+2.5±4.3
FH slice crosscourt7%−6.6+1.5±0.0−5.2±1.4

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.2±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (111 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv EvgeniyaValue
BH through the middle43%+6.0+1.2+1.4+8.5±2.9
BH crosscourt33%+7.7+2.4±0.0+10.1±3.3
BH down the line16%+2.2+3.6−0.3+5.5±4.3
BH slice through the middle3%−6.2−0.5±0.0−6.8±1.2
BH slice crosscourt3%−4.2+0.1±0.0−4.1±1.3

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.8±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (236 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv EvgeniyaValue
BH through the middle31%−2.6+1.6+0.7−0.3±2.3
BH crosscourt29%+1.5±0.0±0.0+1.5±2.5
FH through the middle18%−2.7−1.1+1.7−2.1±2.3
BH down the line11%−0.5−1.3±0.0−1.8±2.9
FH inside-in5%+0.7+0.5−0.5+0.8±3.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.6±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (110 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Evgeniya Rodina returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MajaValue
FH through the middle57%+4.2−0.7+0.2+3.6±3.0
FH crosscourt31%+5.3+0.1+2.7+8.0±4.0
FH down the line12%+1.5−0.7+3.2+4.1±3.9

Lean FH through the middle: −1.4±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (42 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Maja Chwalinska

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · rally+7.0±4.5+4.1+2.8
BH to their backhand · rally+6.7±4.2+3.6+3.1
BH to the middle · rally+6.4±3.5+1.9+4.5
FH to the middle · rally+4.5±3.4+2.7+1.8
FH to the middle · return+3.1±4.2+1.6+1.6
FH to their backhand · rally−2.3±5.4−0.6−1.7

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · rally−2.3±5.4−0.6−1.7
FH to the middle · return+3.1±4.2+1.6+1.6
FH to the middle · rally+4.5±3.4+2.7+1.8
BH to the middle · rally+6.4±3.5+1.9+4.5
BH to their backhand · rally+6.7±4.2+3.6+3.1

Evgeniya Rodina

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · rally+5.6±3.3+3.9+1.6
FH to their backhand · rally+4.9±5.6+5.8−0.9
BH to their forehand · rally+0.9±6.5+0.8+0.1
BH to their backhand · rally−0.7±4.5+2.7−3.3
FH to the middle · rally−1.0±3.6+1.5−2.5
FH to their forehand · rally−2.4±4.6+2.3−4.7

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · rally−2.4±4.6+2.3−4.7
FH to the middle · rally−1.0±3.6+1.5−2.5
BH to their backhand · rally−0.7±4.5+2.7−3.3
BH to their forehand · rally+0.9±6.5+0.8+0.1
FH to their backhand · rally+4.9±5.6+5.8−0.9

Against Evgeniya Rodina-like opponents

Maja Chwalinska vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–58.7%49.2%