RallyIQ

Game plan

Maxime Cressy v Daniil Medvedev

Every number combines what Maxime Cressy does well with what Daniil Medvedev allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Maxime Cressy wins, best of 3 20%90%: 8%–38% · best of 5: 14%
Serve points won 64.3% / 71.4% Maxime / Daniil · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 24%serve 63.8% / 69.7%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Maxime Cressy's record against Daniil Medvedev's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +3.2 on serve, −15.3 on return vs expectation (253 points); head-to-head: +2.3 on serve, −7.8 on return vs expectation (294 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerMaximeDaniil
Direction choice+0.07 ±0.13
better than 77%
+0.01 ±0.04
better than 58%
Shot selection+1.15 ±0.15
better than 99%
−0.06 ±0.04
better than 46%
Execution−1.85 ±0.64
better than 5%
+1.24 ±0.16
better than 98%
Points left on the table3.70 ±0.25
lower than 6%
2.31 ±0.06
lower than 84%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Maxime Cressy +0.18, Daniil Medvedev +1.31. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Maxime Cressy serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMaxime winsv DaniilMatchupOptimal
Wide54%81%69%78.1%±3.367% ▲
Body5%68%58%63.5%±9.50% ▼
T40%81%71%77.8%±3.833% ▼

Optimal v Daniil Medvedev: +0.9±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +1.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMaxime winsv DaniilMatchupOptimal
Wide64%78%69%74.9%±3.457% ▼
Body5%61%58%55.6%±9.90% ▼
T30%78%70%76.0%±4.643% ▲

Optimal v Daniil Medvedev: +0.3±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Daniil Medvedev serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowDaniil winsv MaximeMatchupOptimal
Wide49%74%80%81.6%±2.962% ▲
Body4%63%67%66.4%±7.20% ▼
T46%78%77%79.7%±3.338% ▼

Optimal v Maxime Cressy: +0.8±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +1.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowDaniil winsv MaximeMatchupOptimal
Wide49%78%80%83.8%±3.140% ▼
Body5%60%68%64.7%±7.90% ▼
T47%74%78%80.0%±3.460% ▲

Optimal v Maxime Cressy: +0.7±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +2.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Maxime Cressy returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DaniilValue
FH through the middle45%+4.3±0.0+1.6+5.8±1.7
FH crosscourt34%+5.5−1.7±0.0+3.8±2.9
FH down the line12%+1.7−1.3−0.7−0.3±3.5
FH slice through the middle6%−4.2−1.0+1.1−4.1±1.8
FH slice crosscourt2%−4.3+0.1+0.2−4.0±2.2

Lean FH through the middle: +2.4±1.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (584 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DaniilValue
BH through the middle49%+6.4+0.5+2.0+8.9±1.7
BH crosscourt28%+8.8−1.8+1.0+8.1±2.6
BH down the line11%+4.2+2.9+1.1+8.2±3.9
BH slice through the middle7%−4.2−1.7−0.6−6.6±1.9
BH slice crosscourt3%+0.5−2.6−2.6−4.7±2.2

Lean BH through the middle: +2.2±1.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (471 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DaniilValue
FH crosscourt37%−0.2−5.7−1.3−7.2±3.5
FH through the middle29%−3.5+1.6+1.1−0.7±2.2
FH slice through the middle19%−12.7+0.3±0.0−12.3±2.3
FH slice down the line9%−9.4−0.8−1.8−12.0±2.8
FH down the line7%−1.8+0.5−0.3−1.5±3.0

Lean FH through the middle: +5.6±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (129 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DaniilValue
BH through the middle46%−2.9−8.6+0.4−11.0±1.8
BH crosscourt32%+1.0−1.0+0.6+0.6±2.4
BH down the line15%−0.2−3.8+1.6−2.4±4.1
BH slice through the middle5%−11.3−0.4−0.4−12.1±2.1
BH slice crosscourt3%−4.0+0.4−2.5−6.1±2.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +6.6±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (278 returns charted)

Daniil Medvedev returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MaximeValue
FH through the middle47%+4.3+1.4−1.2+4.4±1.7
FH crosscourt22%+5.5+3.4−2.7+6.2±3.3
FH down the line15%+1.7−0.5−2.0−0.8±3.4
FH slice through the middle10%−4.2−1.1−1.7−7.0±1.9
FH slice down the line4%−4.3−0.1+0.3−4.1±2.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.9±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (5958 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MaximeValue
BH through the middle48%+6.4+3.1−1.4+8.1±1.5
BH crosscourt25%+8.8+2.4+1.1+12.3±2.6
BH down the line10%+4.2+1.6+1.7+7.5±3.7
BH slice through the middle9%−4.2−1.9−4.6−10.6±2.0
BH slice crosscourt4%+0.5−4.5+0.5−3.5±2.7

Lean BH crosscourt: +6.2±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (4981 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MaximeValue
FH through the middle50%−3.5+1.6−1.7−3.6±2.1
FH crosscourt27%−0.2−1.0+0.4−0.9±3.7
FH down the line17%−1.8+1.7−0.1−0.2±4.1
FH slice through the middle2%−12.7−0.8−0.5−14.0±2.0
BH through the middle2%+0.1+1.2−3.8−2.5±1.9

Lean FH down the line: +2.3±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (1558 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MaximeValue
BH through the middle51%−2.9+2.9−3.8−3.7±1.7
BH crosscourt38%+1.0+1.9−3.4−0.5±2.5
BH down the line9%−0.2+1.2−3.8−2.8±4.4
FH through the middle1%−2.9−1.0−1.7−5.6±2.3
FH inside-in1%+0.6−2.8+0.4−1.9±4.2

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.9±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (2951 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Maxime Cressy

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH volley to the middle · serve +1+10.6±4.0+0.7+9.9
FH volley to their backhand · serve +1+8.3±3.9+0.8+7.5
FH volley to their forehand · rally+5.9±4.7+3.5+2.3
BH volley to their backhand · rally+4.0±4.8+3.1+0.9
BH slice to the middle · rally+3.2±1.5+1.4+1.8
FH to the middle · rally+2.6±1.7+1.1+1.5

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · rally−5.7±2.2−5.6−0.1
BH to their forehand · return +1−4.6±4.0−2.1−2.6
FH to their forehand · return +1−3.9±2.8−5.6+1.7
BH to their forehand · rally−3.2±3.3−3.3+0.1
FH to their forehand · return−3.0±2.5−2.1−0.9

Daniil Medvedev

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return +1+9.7±2.9−0.2+9.9
FH to their forehand · return +1+5.4±3.2+2.0+3.3
BH to their forehand · rally+4.3±3.1+1.3+3.1
BH to their forehand · serve +1+4.2±3.5+1.3+2.9
BH to their backhand · return +1+3.7±2.5+2.0+1.7
FH to their forehand · rally+2.8±2.0+2.2+0.6

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to the middle · return−7.2±1.9−1.0−6.2
BH slice to the middle · rally−3.3±1.9−1.9−1.5
BH slice to their backhand · rally−2.6±2.0−2.0−0.6
FH to their backhand · return−1.7±2.7−0.3−1.4
FH to the middle · serve +1−0.9±1.7+0.3−1.2

Against Daniil Medvedev-like opponents

Maxime Cressy vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–68.8%29.1%
Players most similar to Daniil Medvedev2 67.1%14.2%
Daniil Medvedev (charted head-to-head)1 66.1%22.5%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Alexander Zverev, Novak Djokovic, Jenson Brooksby, Karen Khachanov, Taylor Fritz, Miomir Kecmanovic, Richard Gasquet, Andy Murray, John Millman, Gilles Simon. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head