RallyIQ

Game plan

Nick Kyrgios v Hamad Medjedovic

Every number combines what Nick Kyrgios does well with what Hamad Medjedovic allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Nick Kyrgios wins, best of 3 63%90%: 33%–87% · best of 5: 66%
Serve points won 70.3% / 67.4% Nick / Hamad · tour 61.3%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 65%serve 70.1% / 66.9%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Nick Kyrgios's record against Hamad Medjedovic's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +2.0 on serve, −7.2 on return vs expectation (212 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerNickHamad
Direction choice−0.04 ±0.06
better than 46%
+0.03 ±0.10
better than 65%
Shot selection−0.09 ±0.06
better than 41%
−0.06 ±0.26
better than 46%
Execution+0.99 ±0.32
better than 95%
−1.65 ±0.69
better than 7%
Points left on the table2.66 ±0.12
lower than 44%
2.40 ±0.19
lower than 73%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Nick Kyrgios serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowNick winsv HamadMatchupOptimal
Wide38%77%80%82.9%±4.928% ▼
Body3%62%73%72.4%±11.60% ▼
T59%83%82%88.1%±3.672% ▲

Optimal v Hamad Medjedovic: +0.4±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowNick winsv HamadMatchupOptimal
Wide46%79%75%80.9%±4.959% ▲
Body5%59%68%64.9%±12.20% ▼
T49%75%78%80.6%±5.541% ▼

Optimal v Hamad Medjedovic: +0.5±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +0.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Hamad Medjedovic serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowHamad winsv NickMatchupOptimal
Wide44%73%81%81.7%±4.740% ▼
Body9%68%65%69.8%±10.30% ▼
T47%79%78%81.8%±4.760% ▲

Optimal v Nick Kyrgios: +0.9±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +1.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowHamad winsv NickMatchupOptimal
Wide33%73%80%80.0%±5.746% ▲
Body6%62%70%69.3%±10.60% ▼
T61%71%74%73.5%±5.354% ▼

Optimal v Nick Kyrgios: +0.2±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +4.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Nick Kyrgios returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv HamadValue
FH through the middle51%+4.3+0.9−1.4+3.7±2.3
FH down the line19%+1.7+1.6−1.2+2.0±3.8
FH crosscourt13%+5.5+2.3−2.2+5.6±3.9
FH slice through the middle12%−4.2+2.2+0.5−1.5±2.1
FH slice down the line4%−4.3+3.5+0.2−0.6±2.8

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.8±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (1842 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv HamadValue
BH through the middle44%+6.4+2.4−1.8+6.9±2.2
BH crosscourt27%+8.8+2.1+0.9+11.7±2.9
BH slice through the middle12%−4.2+1.3−0.6−3.4±2.2
BH down the line7%+4.2+0.4−0.6+4.1±4.2
BH slice crosscourt5%+0.5+0.2+0.5+1.2±2.8

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.8±2.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (1682 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv HamadValue
FH through the middle53%−3.5+0.1−0.7−4.1±2.5
FH down the line20%−1.8+1.5−3.3−3.6±4.4
FH crosscourt17%−0.2+1.4+2.7+3.9±4.2
FH slice through the middle3%−12.7+0.5+0.8−11.4±1.9
BH through the middle2%+0.1+0.8−1.1−0.2±1.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +6.5±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (593 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv HamadValue
BH crosscourt38%+1.0+1.3+3.2+5.6±2.7
BH through the middle38%−2.9−0.1−1.1−4.1±2.1
BH down the line15%−0.2+1.8−1.1+0.5±4.4
FH through the middle2%−2.9+0.8−0.7−2.8±2.4
FH inside-in2%+0.6−1.3+2.7+1.9±4.2

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.3±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (1256 returns charted)

Hamad Medjedovic returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NickValue
FH through the middle51%+4.3−2.0−0.2+2.0±2.3
FH crosscourt23%+5.5−1.5+0.7+4.7±3.9
FH down the line23%+1.7+0.2+1.5+3.4±3.9
FH slice through the middle3%−4.2+0.4+3.1−0.7±1.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.8±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (158 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NickValue
BH through the middle40%+6.4±0.0+1.2+7.5±2.2
BH crosscourt28%+8.8+0.1+0.6+9.5±3.1
BH down the line20%+4.2+0.2+1.1+5.6±4.2
BH slice through the middle8%−4.2−1.2+0.8−4.6±1.7
BH slice down the line4%−8.4−0.4+0.4−8.5±2.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.4±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (167 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NickValue
FH through the middle48%−3.5+1.4+0.6−1.5±2.2
FH crosscourt30%−0.2+0.9−4.4−3.7±3.7
FH down the line23%−1.8+0.6−0.2−1.4±3.6

Lean FH through the middle: +0.6±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (40 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NickValue
BH through the middle47%−2.9+0.8+1.5−0.6±2.0
BH crosscourt29%+1.0−0.7+1.3+1.7±2.6
BH down the line20%−0.2−0.1+3.9+3.6±4.4
FH inside-in5%+0.6+0.5−4.4−3.4±3.2

Lean BH down the line: +2.8±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (101 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on clay. Each player's clay record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Nick Kyrgios

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · serve +1+4.7±4.9−0.9+5.5
BH to their backhand · return+3.1±3.1+0.4+2.8
FH to their backhand · serve +1+1.9±4.3+0.6+1.3
FH to their backhand · rally−0.7±3.8−1.4+0.7
BH to their backhand · rally−2.0±3.1−2.6+0.6
BH slice to their backhand · rally−2.1±3.4−3.6+1.5

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · rally−6.2±4.3−4.2−2.0
BH to the middle · rally−5.3±2.7−3.3−2.0
BH to the middle · return−5.1±2.9−1.5−3.6
FH to the middle · rally−4.2±2.9−1.7−2.5
FH to the middle · return−4.1±2.9−1.0−3.1

Hamad Medjedovic

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · serve +1+3.5±4.2−0.5+4.0
BH to their forehand · return+3.4±4.9+0.7+2.7
BH to their backhand · rally+1.8±3.2+0.8+1.0
FH to their forehand · serve +1+1.4±4.7−1.9+3.3
FH to their forehand · return +1−0.1±4.5+3.2−3.4
BH to the middle · rally−1.0±2.2−0.4−0.6

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · rally−5.2±3.9−8.0+2.9
FH to the middle · return−4.6±3.0−2.0−2.6
FH to their forehand · return−3.5±4.8±0.0−3.5
BH to their forehand · rally−3.2±4.5−7.0+3.8
FH to the middle · rally−3.2±3.0−0.5−2.7

Against Hamad Medjedovic-like opponents

Nick Kyrgios vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–69.6%31.7%
Players most similar to Hamad Medjedovic1 72.7%25.7%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Fabian Marozsan, Frances Tiafoe, Zhizhen Zhang, Quentin Halys, Matteo Arnaldi, Otto Virtanen, Lucas Pouille, Jerzy Janowicz, Martin Klizan. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.