RallyIQ

Game plan

Nishesh Basavareddy v Marton Fucsovics

Every number combines what Nishesh Basavareddy does well with what Marton Fucsovics allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Nishesh Basavareddy wins, best of 3 64%90%: 29%–89% · best of 5: 67%
Serve points won 64.7% / 61.9% Nishesh / Marton · tour 63.5%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 63%serve 64.2% / 61.7%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. Both were charted enough in the last three seasons, so those carry the most weight. The result is then nudged by Nishesh Basavareddy's record against Marton Fucsovics's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +10.8 on serve, −3.1 on return vs expectation (147 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerNisheshMarton
Direction choice+0.26 ±0.08
better than 97%
−0.08 ±0.08
better than 36%
Shot selection+0.26 ±0.11
better than 77%
−0.45 ±0.12
better than 13%
Execution+0.46 ±0.64
better than 83%
−0.38 ±0.31
better than 49%
Points left on the table2.06 ±0.10
lower than 98%
2.57 ±0.09
lower than 53%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Nishesh Basavareddy +0.48, Marton Fucsovics +0.49. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Nishesh Basavareddy serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowNishesh winsv MartonMatchupOptimal
Wide53%76%74%76.6%±5.166% ▲
Body10%69%56%62.3%±10.90% ▼
T37%78%72%74.6%±6.634% ▼

Optimal v Marton Fucsovics: +0.9±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +2.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowNishesh winsv MartonMatchupOptimal
Wide50%76%69%72.2%±6.345% ▼
Body8%60%56%52.3%±12.80% ▼
T42%72%73%73.1%±6.255% ▲

Optimal v Marton Fucsovics: +0.8±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +2.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Marton Fucsovics serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMarton winsv NisheshMatchupOptimal
Wide39%69%72%68.1%±6.452% ▲
Body14%68%61%65.6%±9.214%
T47%69%69%61.5%±7.234% ▼

Optimal v Nishesh Basavareddy: +0.6±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMarton winsv NisheshMatchupOptimal
Wide54%68%74%69.5%±6.354%
Body13%63%61%60.7%±10.20% ▼
T33%71%72%71.2%±6.846% ▲

Optimal v Nishesh Basavareddy: +0.5±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Nishesh Basavareddy returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MartonValue
FH through the middle44%+4.3−0.9+0.1+3.4±2.5
FH crosscourt31%+5.5+1.5+2.3+9.3±4.1
FH down the line10%+1.7−3.5−3.3−5.1±4.2
FH slice through the middle6%−4.2+0.4+1.1−2.8±2.2
FH slice crosscourt5%−4.3−2.9−1.4−8.6±2.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +6.3±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (262 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MartonValue
BH crosscourt31%+8.8−0.7+0.4+8.5±3.1
BH through the middle27%+6.4+2.0+0.3+8.7±2.4
BH slice through the middle18%−4.2+1.6−1.5−4.1±2.3
BH slice crosscourt12%+0.5−2.5−1.6−3.5±2.9
BH slice down the line8%−8.4−0.4−2.4−11.2±3.3

Lean BH through the middle: +5.7±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (253 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MartonValue
FH crosscourt52%−0.2+1.1+0.9+1.8±4.3
FH through the middle35%−3.5+0.5−0.2−3.2±2.5
FH down the line7%−1.8+0.8−3.6−4.5±3.8
FH slice through the middle6%−12.7−0.3±0.0−13.0±1.4

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.0±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (86 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MartonValue
BH crosscourt58%+1.0+2.9−1.6+2.3±2.7
BH through the middle35%−2.9−1.0+1.2−2.7±2.2
BH down the line7%−0.2−3.2+1.6−1.9±4.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.0±1.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (113 returns charted)

Marton Fucsovics returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NisheshValue
FH through the middle50%+4.3+0.8−0.9+4.2±2.2
FH down the line18%+1.7−1.8−2.5−2.6±4.2
FH slice through the middle14%−4.2−0.8+0.4−4.6±2.2
FH crosscourt11%+5.5−2.1+2.8+6.2±4.3
FH slice down the line5%−4.3−2.4+0.2−6.4±2.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.0±4.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (913 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NisheshValue
BH through the middle38%+6.4+2.0+1.1+9.5±2.2
BH crosscourt22%+8.8+1.8+1.4+12.0±3.2
BH slice through the middle19%−4.2−1.9+1.5−4.6±2.3
BH slice crosscourt8%+0.5−1.2−2.0−2.7±2.9
BH down the line7%+4.2+1.9−1.0+5.2±4.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +7.0±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (925 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NisheshValue
FH through the middle60%−3.5+0.5+1.0−1.9±2.7
FH down the line21%−1.8+2.2−3.2−2.8±4.7
FH crosscourt18%−0.2−0.7+2.2+1.3±4.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.8±4.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (197 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NisheshValue
BH through the middle43%−2.9+0.4−0.2−2.7±2.1
BH crosscourt35%+1.0+0.7−0.5+1.2±3.0
BH down the line11%−0.2−0.4−3.2−3.8±5.0
FH through the middle4%−2.9+0.9+1.0−0.9±2.3
FH inside-in3%+0.6−0.4+2.2+2.3±4.1

Lean FH inside-in: +3.6±4.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (602 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Nishesh Basavareddy

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · serve +1+4.2±2.4+3.4+0.8
FH to the middle · rally+3.6±1.8+2.8+0.8
FH to their forehand · return+3.2±3.9+1.0+2.1
BH to their backhand · return +1+2.7±2.7+2.3+0.4
BH to their backhand · rally+2.1±1.5+2.5−0.4
BH to their forehand · serve +1+1.5±4.4+1.8−0.3

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return−5.2±3.8−1.2−4.0
BH slice to their backhand · rally−3.9±2.1−1.5−2.4
FH to their backhand · serve +1−3.5±2.9−2.3−1.2
BH slice to their forehand · rally−2.2±3.3+1.5−3.7
FH to their backhand · rally−1.9±2.1+1.0−2.9

Marton Fucsovics

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return+4.2±4.1+0.6+3.6
FH to the middle · serve +1+3.1±2.3+1.6+1.5
BH to their backhand · return+2.1±2.6+1.5+0.6
BH to the middle · return +1+2.0±2.2+1.3+0.7
BH to the middle · return+2.0±1.7+1.8+0.2
FH to the middle · rally+1.9±1.7+0.9+1.0

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return +1−5.5±4.7−3.3−2.2
FH to their backhand · return−5.1±3.5−1.6−3.5
BH to their forehand · return−3.2±4.3+0.2−3.5
FH to their forehand · return +1−3.2±3.6−2.3−0.8
BH to their forehand · serve +1−2.4±4.7−0.7−1.8

Against Marton Fucsovics-like opponents

Nishesh Basavareddy vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–65.9%39.2%
Players most similar to Marton Fucsovics1 74.6%34.1%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Lorenzo Musetti, Gael Monfils, Marcos Giron, Miomir Kecmanovic, Dominic Thiem, Radu Albot, Robin Haase, Philipp Kohlschreiber, Paolo Lorenzi, Guillermo Garcia Lopez. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.