RallyIQ

ATP · Right-handed · 9 charted matches · 2014–2019

Paolo Lorenzi

Archetype: Rallies through the middle · Crosscourt backhand

Against an average opponent

Serve points won 63.8% ±3.1 raw 62.6% · tour 63.4% · 850 points
Return points won 34.8% ±3.1 raw 31.9% · tour 36.6% · 783 points

Serve and return points won, refitted against every opponent at once so a record built on weak or strong opposition is put on the same scale. Career, all surfaces, with a 90% margin. Raw is the plain share of points won.

Value per 100 shots

Direction choice −0.14 ±0.21 better than 20% of ATP · raw −0.14
Shot selection −0.03 ±0.20 better than 49% of ATP · raw −0.02
Execution +0.01 ±0.79 better than 68% of ATP · raw +0.17
Points left on the table 2.74 per 100 shots vs best direction · lower than 37% of ATP

Points gained per 100 shots compared with an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for the strength of the opponents faced, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Raw is before the opponent adjustment. Built on 4,143 shots.

Shot expected value

The share of points Paolo Lorenzi goes on to win after each option in the positions they face most often, shrunk toward tour average when the sample is small. Showing the 8 most-used options; teal marks the best one with at least 30 shots.

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side

position worth 46% to the average player · 234 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
BH crosscourt 41% 51.3%±7.6 47.6%
BH through the middle 23% 46.2%±9.6 43.7%
BH down the line 13% 36.6%±11.2 46.4%
BH slice crosscourt 11% 43.3%±12.2 42.5%
BH slice through the middle 9% 28.6%±11.5 35.1%

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle

position worth 51% to the average player · 180 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH through the middle 23% 41.6%±10.4 47.0%
FH down the line 19% 48.7%±11.2 51.5%
BH through the middle 18% 44.9%±11.3 46.8%
FH crosscourt 15% 48.0%±12.0 52.7%
BH crosscourt 15% 59.2%±11.8 49.1%
BH down the line 6% 60.2%±14.5 48.3%

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side

position worth 44% to the average player · 178 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH crosscourt 42% 37.2%±8.2 46.6%
FH through the middle 39% 37.0%±8.4 41.5%
FH down the line 11% 33.2%±12.4 44.7%

Long rally, 9+: drive to your backhand side

position worth 46% to the average player · 171 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
BH crosscourt 41% 52.9%±8.7 48.0%
BH through the middle 19% 45.7%±11.4 43.8%
BH slice crosscourt 13% 35.9%±12.0 42.1%
BH down the line 11% 54.6%±13.1 46.5%
BH slice through the middle 8% 21.3%±11.7 35.1%

Serve under pressure

Pressure predictability index −15 How much less varied Paolo Lorenzi's first-serve direction gets on break points. Positive means easier to read. Based on 73 break-point first serves.

Deuce court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 38% 29% ▼ 71% / 73%
Body 9% 14% 58% / 63%
T 53% 57% 80% / 75%

421 normal · 14 break-point 1st serves

Ad court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 55% 44% ▼ 71% / 73%
Body 9% 29% ▲ 70% / 63%
T 36% 27% ▼ 75% / 72%

335 normal · 59 break-point 1st serves

Is the serve mix in equilibrium?

Game theory says a well-mixed server wins equally often with every direction they use. If one direction wins more, it's underused and points are being left behind. This is the minimax test Walker and Wooders ran on Wimbledon finals, applied to every charted first serve. Win rates include faults. "Optimal" allows for returners reading a habit. No measurable response (−0.05 ± 0.15 points per 100 serves for every 10 points of habitual usage), measured from ATP servers whose mix drifted between matches. Shifts stay within the range servers' habits actually vary, the only range that response was measured over.

Deuce court

1st serveUsagePoints wonOptimal
Wide38% 59.9%±5.8 n=165 34% ▼
Body9% 52.8%±9.8 n=40 0% ▼
T53% 64.8%±4.9 n=230 66% ▲

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.06).
Optimal mix: +0.6 per 100 first serves.

Ad court

1st serveUsagePoints wonOptimal
Wide54% 61.1%±5.2 n=211 52% ▼
Body12% 71.5%±8.5 n=46 0% ▼
T35% 64.7%±6.1 n=137 48% ▲

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.12).
Optimal mix: +0.4 per 100 first serves.

Exploitability 0.51 points per 100 first serves What the optimal mix would win over the current one, both courts. More exploitable than 100% of ATP servers. Tested on matches they weren't fitted on, ATP mixes picked this way win 0.33 per 100 first serves on average.

Repeating the previous direction to the same court: −5.4±6.2 points per 100 against switching. Negative means returners read repeats. Tour-wide, repeating costs women about 0.4 points per 100 and costs men nothing, so men's returners don't measurably anticipate direction. (323 repeats, 488 switches.)

Return by serve direction

Return points won against each serve direction, compared with the tour average.

ServeCourtDirectionPointsWonvs tour
1stAd courtBody 28 42% +4.6±10.6
1stAd courtT 116 24% −3.8±5.8
1stAd courtWide 94 20% −6.9±5.9
1stDeuce courtBody 40 29% −8.1±8.9
1stDeuce courtT 88 22% −3.4±6.2
1stDeuce courtWide 132 24% −3.0±5.5
2ndAd courtBody 31 47% −2.1±10.5
2ndAd courtT 14 38% −11.1±12.0
2ndAd courtWide 82 53% +4.8±7.8
2ndDeuce courtBody 54 48% −0.6±9.0
2ndDeuce courtT 51 49% −0.4±9.1
2ndDeuce courtWide 35 48% +0.3±10.2

Signature patterns

Recurring sequences that win more than Paolo Lorenzi's own baseline, ranked by edge weighted by how often they're used.

Serve → +1

  1. Body serve (deuce court) → FH through the middle used 4.1% · won 58% · −13.9±11.4 vs own baseline
  2. Wide serve (ad court) → BH through the middle used 4.3% · won 55% · −16.9±11.3 vs own baseline

Return

  1. vs wide serve (ad court) → BH crosscourt, mid used 8.7% · won 39% · +2.4±11.4 vs own baseline
  2. vs wide serve (ad court) → BH through the middle, mid used 8.3% · won 38% · +1.2±11.5 vs own baseline
  3. vs T serve (deuce court) → BH through the middle, mid used 8.7% · won 37% · +0.5±11.3 vs own baseline

Rally, consecutive own shots

  1. BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt used 6.3% · won 50% · +8.1±9.7 vs own baseline
  2. FH crosscourt → BH crosscourt used 4.3% · won 48% · +5.5±10.8 vs own baseline
  3. BH crosscourt → FH crosscourt used 4.8% · won 47% · +4.8±10.5 vs own baseline
  4. FH through the middle → FH through the middle used 4.6% · won 46% · +3.9±10.6 vs own baseline
  5. FH through the middle → FH crosscourt used 4.0% · won 46% · +3.6±11.0 vs own baseline

Discovered sequences

Mined from every me → opponent → me run of three shots, with no templates. Ranked by how much more often Paolo Lorenzi wins the point once the sequence happens, weighted by how often it happens. Think of them as chess openings.

  1. BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt used 1.9% · won 54% · +8.3±10.2 vs own baseline · +10.6 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Miomir Kecmanovic (6/12), Carlos Berlocq (4/7)
  2. FH down the line → BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt used 1.1% · won 52% · +6.4±12.0 vs own baseline · +10.2 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Brayden Schnur (6/7)
  3. FH crosscourt → FH down the line → BH crosscourt used 0.8% · won 51% · +5.5±12.7 vs own baseline · +10.0 vs tour on the same sequence
  4. FH through the middle → FH crosscourt → FH crosscourt used 1.2% · won 45% · −0.7±11.6 vs own baseline · −1.9 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Miomir Kecmanovic (6/16)
  5. BH through the middle → FH crosscourt → FH through the middle used 1.1% · won 43% · −2.1±11.9 vs own baseline · +0.6 vs tour on the same sequence
  6. FH crosscourt → FH crosscourt → FH through the middle used 1.1% · won 43% · −2.1±11.9 vs own baseline · −3.7 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Miomir Kecmanovic (4/12)

Strengths and vulnerabilities

Value per 100 shots compared with the average player hitting (strengths) or facing (vulnerabilities) the same shot. Only shot types seen at least 120 times.

Hurts opponents most with

FH to the middle · rally+1.7203
BH to the middle · rally+1.0140
BH to the middle · return+1.0134
BH to their backhand · rally+1.0250
FH to their backhand · rally+0.2150

Most exposed to

FH to their backhand · serve +1−3.9127
T 1st serve · ad court−2.8162
FH to their forehand · rally−1.9271
FH to their backhand · rally−1.8272
BH to the middle · rally−1.1121

Active players who are best at the shot in the top weakness: Stefanos Tsitsipas, Brandon Nakashima, Rinky Hijikata, Thiago Seyboth Wild, Jannik Sinner

Tactical fingerprint

Each bar shows how far a style trait is from the ATP average, in standard deviations.

Through the middle34%
T serves · deuce53%
Wide serves · ad54%
Points at net14%
Chipped returns19%
Avg rally length4.1
Drop shots / shot1.8%
BH down the line21%
Serve & volley10%
Deep returns26%
Backhand slice20%
T serves · ad35%
Forehand share50%
Point-ending shots20.0%
Unforced errors / shot8.3%
FH down the line27%
Run-around forehands10%
Wide serves · deuce38%
1st serve in56%

Plays most like

  1. Andrei Pavel 1999–2006 plan v
  2. Gael Monfils 2005–2026 plan v
  3. Janko Tipsarevic 2007–2019 plan v
  4. Arthur Cazaux 2020–2025 plan v
  5. Marton Fucsovics 2018–2026 plan v
  6. Flavio Cobolli 2022–2026 plan v
  7. Jannik Sinner 2013–2026 plan v
  8. Mattia Bellucci 2022–2025 plan v

Closest from another era

  1. Cedric Pioline 1992–2000
  2. Michael Chang 1989–1998
  3. Marcelo Rios 1995–2001

Charted matches