Game plan
Nishesh Basavareddy v Peter Polansky
Every number combines what Nishesh Basavareddy does well with what Peter Polansky allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective
Serve plan
The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.
Nishesh Basavareddy serving
Deuce court
| 1st serve | Now | Nishesh wins | v Peter | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 53% | 76% | 75% | 77.3%±9.1 | 66% ▲ |
| Body | 10% | 69% | 59% | 64.6%±14.9 | 0% ▼ |
| T | 37% | 78% | 72% | 74.8%±10.2 | 34% ▼ |
Optimal v Peter Polansky: +0.7±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Ad court
| 1st serve | Now | Nishesh wins | v Peter | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 50% | 76% | 69% | 72.8%±11.1 | 59% ▲ |
| Body | 8% | 60% | 60% | 57.0%±16.2 | 0% ▼ |
| T | 42% | 72% | 76% | 76.0%±10.1 | 41% ▼ |
Optimal v Peter Polansky: +0.5±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +3.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Peter Polansky serving
Deuce court
| 1st serve | Now | Peter wins | v Nishesh | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 33% | 69% | 72% | 68.1%±11.7 | 46% ▲ |
| Body | 17% | 70% | 61% | 67.3%±13.6 | 17% |
| T | 50% | 75% | 69% | 68.8%±11.8 | 37% ▼ |
Optimal v Nishesh Basavareddy: +0.4±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +0.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Ad court
| 1st serve | Now | Peter wins | v Nishesh | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 40% | 66% | 74% | 67.9%±11.5 | 53% ▲ |
| Body | 12% | 57% | 61% | 54.7%±15.1 | 0% ▼ |
| T | 48% | 67% | 72% | 66.4%±11.4 | 47% |
Optimal v Nishesh Basavareddy: +0.6±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Return plan
Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.
Nishesh Basavareddy returning
1st serve to the forehand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Peter | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH through the middle | 44% | +4.3 | −0.9 | +1.1 | +4.4±2.9 |
| FH crosscourt | 31% | +5.5 | +1.5 | +0.1 | +7.1±3.6 |
| FH down the line | 10% | +1.7 | −3.5 | +1.0 | −0.8±4.0 |
| FH slice through the middle | 6% | −4.2 | +0.4 | +0.6 | −3.2±1.8 |
| FH slice crosscourt | 5% | −4.3 | −2.9 | ±0.0 | −7.2±1.7 |
Lean FH crosscourt: +3.9±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (262 returns charted)
1st serve to the backhand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Peter | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH crosscourt | 31% | +8.8 | −0.7 | +0.4 | +8.5±3.4 |
| BH through the middle | 27% | +6.4 | +2.0 | −1.8 | +6.6±2.8 |
| BH slice through the middle | 18% | −4.2 | +1.6 | +0.8 | −1.8±2.2 |
| BH slice crosscourt | 12% | +0.5 | −2.5 | +1.4 | −0.6±2.5 |
| BH slice down the line | 8% | −8.4 | −0.4 | ±0.0 | −8.8±2.3 |
Lean BH crosscourt: +5.1±2.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (253 returns charted)
2nd serve to the forehand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Peter | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH crosscourt | 52% | −0.2 | +1.1 | +1.0 | +1.9±3.6 |
| FH through the middle | 35% | −3.5 | +0.5 | −0.5 | −3.4±2.7 |
| FH down the line | 7% | −1.8 | +0.8 | +1.4 | +0.4±3.3 |
| FH slice through the middle | 6% | −12.7 | −0.3 | ±0.0 | −12.9±1.0 |
Lean FH crosscourt: +2.8±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (86 returns charted)
2nd serve to the backhand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Peter | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH crosscourt | 58% | +1.0 | +2.9 | +0.1 | +4.0±3.3 |
| BH through the middle | 35% | −2.9 | −1.0 | +0.7 | −3.2±2.5 |
| BH down the line | 7% | −0.2 | −3.2 | +0.3 | −3.1±3.6 |
Lean BH crosscourt: +3.0±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (113 returns charted)
Peter Polansky returning
1st serve to the forehand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Nishesh | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH through the middle | 54% | +4.3 | −2.0 | −0.9 | +1.4±2.8 |
| FH down the line | 24% | +1.7 | +1.2 | −2.5 | +0.4±4.1 |
| FH slice through the middle | 12% | −4.2 | −0.2 | +0.4 | −3.9±1.9 |
| FH crosscourt | 10% | +5.5 | −1.6 | +2.8 | +6.6±3.6 |
Lean FH through the middle: +0.3±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (50 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)
1st serve to the backhand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Nishesh | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH through the middle | 49% | +6.4 | −0.8 | +1.1 | +6.7±2.6 |
| BH crosscourt | 26% | +8.8 | +0.4 | +1.4 | +10.6±3.2 |
| BH down the line | 15% | +4.2 | −0.6 | −1.0 | +2.6±3.9 |
| BH slice through the middle | 11% | −4.2 | +0.9 | +1.5 | −1.8±2.0 |
Lean BH through the middle: +0.5±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (47 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)
Rally plan
Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.
Nishesh Basavareddy
Favour
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH to their backhand · rally | +4.9±2.4 | +2.5 | +2.4 |
| FH to the middle · rally | +1.8±2.4 | +2.8 | −1.0 |
| FH to their forehand · rally | +0.6±3.1 | +1.9 | −1.2 |
| FH to their backhand · rally | ±0.0±3.2 | +1.0 | −1.0 |
| BH to the middle · return | −0.2±2.6 | +0.6 | −0.8 |
Avoid
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH to the middle · return | −0.2±2.6 | +0.6 | −0.8 |
| FH to their backhand · rally | ±0.0±3.2 | +1.0 | −1.0 |
| FH to their forehand · rally | +0.6±3.1 | +1.9 | −1.2 |
| FH to the middle · rally | +1.8±2.4 | +2.8 | −1.0 |
| BH to their backhand · rally | +4.9±2.4 | +2.5 | +2.4 |
Peter Polansky
Favour
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| FH to their backhand · rally | +3.0±3.2 | +1.3 | +1.6 |
| BH to the middle · rally | +1.8±2.1 | +1.0 | +0.9 |
| BH to their backhand · rally | +1.4±2.6 | +0.3 | +1.1 |
| FH to the middle · rally | +1.3±2.4 | +0.3 | +1.0 |
| FH to their forehand · rally | −0.3±3.3 | −0.3 | +0.1 |
Avoid
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| FH to their forehand · rally | −0.3±3.3 | −0.3 | +0.1 |
| FH to the middle · rally | +1.3±2.4 | +0.3 | +1.0 |
| BH to their backhand · rally | +1.4±2.6 | +0.3 | +1.1 |
| BH to the middle · rally | +1.8±2.1 | +1.0 | +0.9 |
| FH to their backhand · rally | +3.0±3.2 | +1.3 | +1.6 |
Against Peter Polansky-like opponents
| Nishesh Basavareddy v | Matches | Serve pts won | Return pts won |
|---|---|---|---|
| All charted opponents | – | 65.9% | 39.2% |