RallyIQ

Game plan

Svetlana Kuznetsova v Kim Clijsters

Every number combines what Svetlana Kuznetsova does well with what Kim Clijsters allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Svetlana Kuznetsova wins, best of 3 18%90%: 9%–32% · best of 5: 13%
Serve points won 52.2% / 59.1% Svetlana / Kim · tour 56.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 21%serve 52.4% / 58.5%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Svetlana Kuznetsova's record against Kim Clijsters's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −1.8 on serve, −2.2 on return vs expectation (335 points); head-to-head: +0.6 on serve, −7.0 on return vs expectation (170 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerSvetlanaKim
Direction choice+0.24 ±0.09
better than 90%
+0.44 ±0.06
better than 98%
Shot selection+0.19 ±0.15
better than 64%
−0.25 ±0.09
better than 24%
Execution+0.37 ±0.49
better than 75%
+0.31 ±0.39
better than 73%
Points left on the table2.35 ±0.12
lower than 81%
2.06 ±0.09
lower than 98%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Svetlana Kuznetsova serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowSvetlana winsv KimMatchupOptimal
Wide47%66%64%64.5%±5.163% ▲
Body12%55%56%53.2%±8.612%
T40%61%64%57.2%±5.825% ▼

Optimal v Kim Clijsters: +0.6±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +4.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowSvetlana winsv KimMatchupOptimal
Wide50%63%62%58.9%±5.644% ▼
Body12%56%52%52.3%±8.927% ▲
T38%59%61%55.9%±5.729% ▼

Optimal v Kim Clijsters: +0.1±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Kim Clijsters serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowKim winsv SvetlanaMatchupOptimal
Wide58%67%63%63.9%±5.053% ▼
Body9%60%64%66.5%±7.90% ▼
T32%70%71%73.1%±5.347% ▲

Optimal v Svetlana Kuznetsova: +0.6±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +6.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowKim winsv SvetlanaMatchupOptimal
Wide43%66%63%64.3%±5.658% ▲
Body12%56%57%57.2%±8.47% ▼
T44%61%62%57.8%±5.735% ▼

Optimal v Svetlana Kuznetsova: +0.5±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Svetlana Kuznetsova returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KimValue
FH through the middle44%+4.2+1.4−0.4+5.2±2.0
FH crosscourt27%+5.3+2.0−1.9+5.4±3.5
FH slice through the middle11%−6.7+1.2+2.4−3.1±2.5
FH down the line10%+1.5+2.3+0.3+4.1±4.1
FH slice crosscourt7%−6.6−0.3+0.5−6.5±2.7

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.2±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (597 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KimValue
BH through the middle36%+6.0+1.7−0.8+6.9±2.2
BH crosscourt30%+7.7−2.6−2.9+2.2±3.0
BH slice through the middle13%−6.2+0.3+1.7−4.2±2.5
BH down the line11%+2.2+0.6−0.9+1.9±4.5
BH slice crosscourt6%−4.2+0.2−0.5−4.4±3.0

Lean BH through the middle: +4.9±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (541 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KimValue
FH through the middle46%−3.2+2.0−1.3−2.5±2.7
FH crosscourt29%+0.5−0.1−0.5−0.1±4.1
FH down the line25%−0.6+3.8−0.5+2.7±4.8

Lean FH down the line: +3.2±4.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (129 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KimValue
BH crosscourt38%+1.5+1.6+0.2+3.3±3.2
BH through the middle25%−2.6±0.0−0.4−3.0±2.4
BH down the line10%−0.5+4.1+2.5+6.0±5.2
FH through the middle10%−2.7+0.7−1.3−3.3±2.3
FH inside-in9%+0.7−6.1−0.5−5.8±4.3

Lean BH down the line: +5.7±4.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (437 returns charted)

Kim Clijsters returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SvetlanaValue
FH through the middle38%+4.2+0.9+1.0+6.1±2.2
FH crosscourt26%+5.3+0.8−0.6+5.5±3.5
FH down the line16%+1.5+3.0+1.1+5.6±4.0
FH slice through the middle11%−6.7+0.3+1.6−4.8±2.5
FH slice crosscourt6%−6.6+2.4−0.5−4.8±2.7

Lean FH through the middle: +2.5±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (965 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SvetlanaValue
BH through the middle42%+6.0−0.5+1.3+6.9±2.0
BH crosscourt33%+7.7−1.9+1.6+7.4±2.8
BH slice through the middle11%−6.2−1.0−1.1−8.3±2.5
BH down the line7%+2.2−2.5+3.4+3.1±4.6
BH slice crosscourt5%−4.2−1.5+1.1−4.6±3.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.4±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (707 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SvetlanaValue
FH crosscourt37%+0.5−1.1±0.0−0.6±4.1
FH through the middle29%−3.2+0.6+0.9−1.7±2.9
FH down the line21%−0.6−0.4−3.9−4.9±5.1
BH through the middle6%−1.0+0.3+1.1+0.4±2.1
FH slice through the middle4%−15.2+0.9+1.1−13.2±2.0

Lean BH through the middle: +2.8±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (311 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SvetlanaValue
BH crosscourt51%+1.5+0.2+0.4+2.1±2.8
BH through the middle35%−2.6−0.2+1.1−1.7±2.3
BH down the line12%−0.5+0.8+2.6+2.9±5.1
BH slice through the middle1%−11.7±0.0−0.8−12.5±1.6
FH inside-out1%+1.4±0.0−3.9−2.5±3.4

Lean BH down the line: +2.2±4.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (555 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Svetlana Kuznetsova

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return+5.0±5.2+4.1+1.0
FH slice to the middle · return+4.9±3.6+1.7+3.1
FH to the middle · return +1+3.9±3.0+1.4+2.5
BH to their forehand · return +1+3.3±5.7+4.0−0.7
BH slice to the middle · return+3.1±3.4+1.2+1.9
FH to their backhand · return+2.9±4.0+2.7+0.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to their forehand · rally−16.5±5.2−7.1−9.4
FH volley to their forehand · rally−9.1±8.3−4.8−4.2
BH to their forehand · serve +1−7.8±5.1−2.1−5.7
BH to their forehand · rally−3.9±3.3−0.9−3.0
FH to their forehand · serve +1−3.6±3.2−1.3−2.3

Kim Clijsters

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH slice to the middle · return+4.9±3.4+1.7+3.2
FH to their backhand · serve +1+4.6±3.4+1.5+3.1
BH to their forehand · return+4.2±5.2−0.8+5.0
FH to the middle · return +1+3.6±3.1+2.4+1.1
BH to the middle · serve +1+3.1±2.5+1.1+2.0
FH to their backhand · rally+3.1±2.5+1.5+1.7

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return +1−2.7±4.4−3.0+0.3
BH slice to the middle · return−2.0±3.5−0.9−1.0
FH to their backhand · return−1.2±4.3+0.3−1.5
BH to their forehand · rally−0.4±3.5−2.0+1.6
BH slice to the middle · rally−0.3±2.7−2.6+2.3

Against Kim Clijsters-like opponents

Svetlana Kuznetsova vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–54.6%43.5%
Players most similar to Kim Clijsters3 53.9%39.2%
Kim Clijsters (charted head-to-head)1 54.5%36.6%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Anastasia Potapova, Karolina Pliskova, Anna Kalinskaya, Iga Swiatek, Belinda Bencic, Maria Sharapova, Ana Ivanovic, Elena Dementieva, Jelena Dokic. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head