RallyIQ

Game plan

Yannick Hanfmann v Carlos Alcaraz

Every number combines what Yannick Hanfmann does well with what Carlos Alcaraz allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Yannick Hanfmann wins, best of 3 8%90%: 2%–23% · best of 5: 4%
Serve points won 55.7% / 66.7% Yannick / Carlos · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 10%serve 56.4% / 66.3%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Yannick Hanfmann's record against Carlos Alcaraz's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −7.1 on serve, −3.8 on return vs expectation (330 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerYannickCarlos
Direction choice+0.01 ±0.14
better than 58%
+0.08 ±0.03
better than 77%
Shot selection+0.22 ±0.32
better than 74%
+0.20 ±0.07
better than 73%
Execution−0.66 ±0.91
better than 38%
+0.54 ±0.21
better than 85%
Points left on the table2.68 ±0.23
lower than 41%
2.43 ±0.05
lower than 70%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Yannick Hanfmann serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowYannick winsv CarlosMatchupOptimal
Wide40%61%66%53.4%±6.327% ▼
Body9%53%61%50.6%±10.29%
T51%73%68%64.9%±6.264% ▲

Optimal v Carlos Alcaraz: +0.5±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +5.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowYannick winsv CarlosMatchupOptimal
Wide55%64%67%57.4%±6.349% ▼
Body8%55%58%50.6%±11.00% ▼
T38%68%65%61.0%±6.751% ▲

Optimal v Carlos Alcaraz: +0.6±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Carlos Alcaraz serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowCarlos winsv YannickMatchupOptimal
Wide46%73%76%76.4%±5.259% ▲
Body18%67%63%67.4%±9.217%
T37%77%73%74.7%±5.624% ▼

Optimal v Yannick Hanfmann: +0.6±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowCarlos winsv YannickMatchupOptimal
Wide49%72%75%74.5%±5.550%
Body16%66%71%73.1%±9.13% ▼
T34%72%78%77.9%±5.847% ▲

Optimal v Yannick Hanfmann: +0.6±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Yannick Hanfmann returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CarlosValue
FH through the middle60%+4.3+1.0+0.5+5.8±2.1
FH crosscourt21%+5.5−0.2+0.8+6.1±3.4
FH down the line9%+1.7−0.4+1.0+2.3±3.2
FH slice through the middle6%−4.2+0.1−1.5−5.6±1.7
FH slice down the line3%−4.3−1.0+0.9−4.3±2.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.6±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (186 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CarlosValue
BH crosscourt38%+8.8−1.8+0.7+7.7±2.6
BH through the middle38%+6.4+0.5+0.4+7.3±2.1
BH slice through the middle9%−4.2−0.1−2.8−7.1±1.9
BH down the line8%+4.2+0.8+0.1+5.1±3.3
BH slice crosscourt7%+0.5−1.9−0.4−1.8±2.4

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.3±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (208 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CarlosValue
FH through the middle64%−3.5−1.5+0.1−4.9±2.3
FH crosscourt36%−0.2+5.7−1.0+4.4±3.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.9±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (64 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CarlosValue
BH through the middle48%−2.9+0.9−1.2−3.1±1.9
BH crosscourt39%+1.0+0.2−0.2+1.0±2.5
BH down the line8%−0.2+1.5−1.6−0.3±3.5
FH through the middle5%−2.9+0.5+0.1−2.3±1.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.3±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (151 returns charted)

Carlos Alcaraz returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YannickValue
FH through the middle49%+4.3+1.2+3.5+8.9±2.0
FH crosscourt24%+5.5+1.3+2.6+9.4±3.4
FH down the line14%+1.7+1.2+0.3+3.2±3.6
FH slice through the middle8%−4.2+0.2−0.3−4.4±1.9
FH slice down the line2%−4.3+0.8±0.0−3.5±2.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.9±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (4205 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YannickValue
BH through the middle40%+6.4+1.0+2.8+10.3±1.9
BH crosscourt34%+8.8+1.5+3.1+13.4±2.7
BH slice through the middle10%−4.2−2.3+0.1−6.4±2.1
BH down the line7%+4.2−0.5+1.1+4.9±3.8
BH slice crosscourt6%+0.5−1.3+1.1+0.4±2.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.3±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (4723 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YannickValue
FH through the middle42%−3.5−1.0+0.3−4.2±2.4
FH crosscourt36%−0.2−0.2+3.6+3.1±3.6
FH down the line17%−1.8−1.0+2.4−0.3±4.2
FH slice through the middle2%−12.7−0.8±0.0−13.4±1.6
FH slice down the line1%−9.4−1.6±0.0−11.0±1.7

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.2±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (1132 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YannickValue
BH crosscourt45%+1.0+0.1−0.5+0.6±2.5
BH through the middle27%−2.9−2.1+1.6−3.4±2.0
BH down the line9%−0.2+1.4−2.7−1.5±4.0
FH through the middle7%−2.9±0.0+0.3−2.6±2.2
FH inside-in5%+0.6−1.5+3.6+2.7±4.1
FH inside-out4%+1.0±0.0+2.4+3.4±3.5

Lean FH inside-out: +4.3±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (2787 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Yannick Hanfmann

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return+4.8±3.5+4.1+0.7
BH to the middle · return+1.1±1.7+1.0+0.1
FH to the middle · return+0.7±1.8−0.4+1.1
BH to the middle · return +1+0.4±2.0+0.2+0.1
BH to the middle · serve +1+0.1±2.0−0.4+0.5
BH to their backhand · return±0.0±2.2−0.5+0.5

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · rally−6.2±2.2−4.0−2.2
BH to their backhand · serve +1−6.2±2.4−5.6−0.6
BH to their backhand · return +1−3.3±2.6−3.6+0.3
FH to their forehand · serve +1−3.0±2.7−0.7−2.2
FH to their backhand · serve +1−2.9±2.6−1.3−1.5

Carlos Alcaraz

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return+4.6±1.7+1.0+3.6
FH to their forehand · return+4.6±3.4+0.4+4.2
FH to the middle · return+4.1±1.8+0.7+3.4
FH to their forehand · return +1+3.9±3.2+1.3+2.6
BH to their backhand · return+2.6±2.3+1.0+1.7
FH to the middle · serve +1+2.1±2.1+1.3+0.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · serve +1−2.0±2.5+0.9−2.9
BH to the middle · return +1−1.7±2.0+0.6−2.3
BH to the middle · rally−0.9±1.5±0.0−0.9
FH to the middle · return +1−0.8±2.2+0.2−1.1
FH to their backhand · rally−0.6±2.4+1.6−2.2

Against Carlos Alcaraz-like opponents

Yannick Hanfmann vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–59.8%35.5%
Players most similar to Carlos Alcaraz2 54.7%34.2%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Stefanos Tsitsipas, Ben Shelton, Fabian Marozsan, Tallon Griekspoor, Alejandro Tabilo, Pablo Carreno Busta, Zizou Bergs, Lorenzo Sonego, Francisco Cerundolo, Luca Nardi. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.