RallyIQ

Game plan

Yoshihito Nishioka v Valentin Royer

Every number combines what Yoshihito Nishioka does well with what Valentin Royer allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Yoshihito Nishioka wins, best of 3 51%90%: 23%–78% · best of 5: 51%
Serve points won 62.0% / 61.9% Yoshihito / Valentin · tour 63.8%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 51%serve 62.0% / 61.9%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Yoshihito Nishioka's record against Valentin Royer's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads. A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerYoshihitoValentin
Direction choice−0.29 ±0.10
better than 6%
−0.08 ±0.16
better than 34%
Shot selection−0.18 ±0.14
better than 32%
+0.45 ±0.24
better than 89%
Execution+0.62 ±0.43
better than 87%
−1.03 ±0.65
better than 24%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Yoshihito Nishioka serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowYoshihito winsv ValentinMatchupOptimal
Wide25%62%75%64.4%±9.638% ▲
Body22%57%63%56.9%±12.99% ▼
T53%61%74%60.1%±9.353%

Optimal v Valentin Royer: +0.4±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowYoshihito winsv ValentinMatchupOptimal
Wide55%63%71%61.3%±8.955%
Body16%60%63%60.2%±12.23% ▼
T29%75%72%75.1%±8.142% ▲

Optimal v Valentin Royer: +0.7±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +9.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Valentin Royer serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowValentin winsv YoshihitoMatchupOptimal
Wide36%78%79%83.2%±6.349% ▲
Body22%65%55%56.7%±12.79% ▼
T42%75%80%79.4%±7.242%

Optimal v Yoshihito Nishioka: +1.5±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +7.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowValentin winsv YoshihitoMatchupOptimal
Wide46%71%78%76.3%±7.846%
Body19%56%62%55.0%±13.86% ▼
T35%75%77%79.5%±7.348% ▲

Optimal v Yoshihito Nishioka: +1.3±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +6.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Yoshihito Nishioka returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ValentinValue
FH through the middle40%+4.3+3.3−0.8+6.7±2.9
FH crosscourt23%+5.5+0.7−4.1+2.0±4.1
FH slice through the middle17%−4.2+2.3−0.9−2.7±1.9
FH down the line9%+1.7−0.1−0.6+1.0±4.3
FH slice crosscourt7%−4.3+3.3±0.0−1.0±2.0

Lean FH through the middle: +4.1±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (435 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ValentinValue
BH through the middle38%+6.4+0.5−0.2+6.7±2.4
BH crosscourt22%+8.8±0.0±0.0+8.8±3.2
BH slice through the middle21%−4.2−0.6−0.7−5.5±2.4
BH slice down the line7%−8.4+1.7+1.2−5.4±3.4
BH down the line6%+4.2−4.8−0.5−1.0±4.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +6.0±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (612 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ValentinValue
FH through the middle49%−3.5+1.5−1.6−3.5±2.8
FH crosscourt38%−0.2+0.3+0.6+0.7±4.0
FH down the line9%−1.8−1.0−1.8−4.5±4.4
FH slice through the middle4%−12.7+0.5±0.0−12.2±1.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.1±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (261 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ValentinValue
BH through the middle53%−2.9+2.9−0.1−0.1±2.4
BH crosscourt29%+1.0+2.5−0.2+3.3±2.6
BH down the line9%−0.2+0.7+0.8+1.3±4.7
BH slice through the middle4%−11.3−0.5−0.8−12.6±2.0
FH through the middle3%−2.9+1.8−1.6−2.7±2.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.0±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (286 returns charted)

Valentin Royer returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YoshihitoValue
FH through the middle46%+4.3−2.6+3.3+5.0±2.7
FH crosscourt27%+5.5−1.3+2.1+6.3±4.2
FH down the line22%+1.7+0.8−2.0+0.5±4.4
FH slice through the middle5%−4.2−1.6+1.2−4.6±2.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.4±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (124 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YoshihitoValue
BH through the middle45%+6.4+0.7+4.2+11.4±2.3
BH crosscourt38%+8.8+1.7+5.0+15.5±3.2
BH slice through the middle9%−4.2−2.2+0.9−5.4±2.1
BH down the line8%+4.2+0.1+0.8+5.1±3.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.5±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (102 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YoshihitoValue
BH through the middle60%−2.9+0.8+0.2−1.9±2.2
BH crosscourt40%+1.0−2.8+0.8−1.0±2.7

Lean BH crosscourt: +0.5±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (42 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Yoshihito Nishioka

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · rally+6.1±2.6+3.4+2.6
FH to their forehand · serve +1+5.8±5.0−0.1+5.8
FH to the middle · serve +1+3.5±3.3+1.3+2.2
FH to their forehand · rally+1.9±4.0+2.5−0.5
BH to the middle · rally+1.8±2.7+0.7+1.1
FH to their backhand · rally+0.8±3.5+2.1−1.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · rally−3.9±3.2+0.4−4.3
FH to their backhand · serve +1−1.7±4.4−1.9+0.2
FH to the middle · return−1.1±3.4+1.3−2.3
BH to the middle · return−0.1±3.3+1.7−1.8
FH to their backhand · rally+0.8±3.5+2.1−1.2

Valentin Royer

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return+6.1±2.8+1.0+5.0
BH to their forehand · rally+5.6±5.1+3.3+2.3
FH to the middle · return+3.3±3.3+0.3+3.0
BH to their backhand · return+2.6±4.3−2.4+4.9
FH to the middle · rally+1.0±2.9+0.3+0.7
FH to their backhand · rally+0.4±3.7+0.4±0.0

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · return +1−7.3±4.7−2.6−4.8
BH to their backhand · rally−2.9±3.1−0.9−2.0
FH to their forehand · rally−2.6±3.8−2.1−0.5
BH to the middle · rally−1.2±2.6−1.5+0.3
FH to their backhand · serve +1−0.8±4.5−1.6+0.8

Against Valentin Royer-like opponents

Yoshihito Nishioka vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–58.2%33.9%