WTA · Right-handed · 8 charted matches · 2003–2013
Marion Bartoli
Archetype: Ad-court T server · Rallies through the middle
Against an average opponent
Serve and return points won, refitted against every opponent at once so a record built on weak or strong opposition is put on the same scale. Career, all surfaces, with a 90% margin. Raw is the plain share of points won.
Value per 100 shots
Points gained per 100 shots compared with an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for the strength of the opponents faced, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Raw is before the opponent adjustment. Built on 2,561 shots.
Shot expected value
The share of points Marion Bartoli goes on to win after each option in the positions they face most often, shrunk toward tour average when the sample is small. Showing the 8 most-used options; teal marks the best one with at least 30 shots.
Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle
position worth 50% to the average player · 182 shots
| Option | Used | Win % | Tour |
|---|---|---|---|
| FH through the middle | 19% | 45.7%±11.1 | 45.8% |
| BH crosscourt | 19% | 44.0%±11.0 | 50.9% |
| FH crosscourt | 19% | 49.2%±11.2 | 52.7% |
| BH through the middle | 18% | 40.9%±11.2 | 46.2% |
| FH down the line | 13% | 37.4%±12.0 | 52.2% |
| BH down the line | 7% | 53.1%±14.5 | 50.0% |
Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side
position worth 45% to the average player · 155 shots
| Option | Used | Win % | Tour |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH crosscourt | 46% | 47.8%±8.6 | 47.6% |
| BH through the middle | 32% | 45.9%±9.9 | 43.3% |
| BH down the line | 23% | 38.8%±10.8 | 46.8% |
Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side
position worth 43% to the average player · 138 shots
| Option | Used | Win % | Tour |
|---|---|---|---|
| FH crosscourt | 51% | 41.5%±8.5 | 46.7% |
| FH through the middle | 28% | 32.6%±10.0 | 41.3% |
| FH down the line | 21% | 51.0%±11.7 | 44.9% |
Long rally, 9+: drive to your backhand side
position worth 44% to the average player · 104 shots
| Option | Used | Win % | Tour |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH crosscourt | 58% | 62.0%±8.9 | 47.9% |
| BH through the middle | 29% | 41.1%±11.4 | 42.7% |
| BH down the line | 13% | 45.1%±14.0 | 46.7% |
Serve under pressure
Pressure predictability index ±0 How much less varied Marion Bartoli's first-serve direction gets on break points. Positive means easier to read. Based on 72 break-point first serves.
Deuce court
| 1st serve | Usage | Break pt | Won when in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 49% | 53% | 63% / 66% |
| Body | 16% | 16% | 49% / 57% |
| T | 35% | 32% | 61% / 68% |
217 normal · 19 break-point 1st serves
Ad court
| 1st serve | Usage | Break pt | Won when in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 29% | 21% ▼ | 63% / 66% |
| Body | 23% | 43% ▲ | 52% / 56% |
| T | 48% | 36% ▼ | 58% / 64% |
162 normal · 53 break-point 1st serves
Is the serve mix in equilibrium?
Game theory says a well-mixed server wins equally often with every direction they use. If one direction wins more, it's underused and points are being left behind. This is the minimax test Walker and Wooders ran on Wimbledon finals, applied to every charted first serve. Win rates include faults. "Optimal" allows for returners reading a habit. A direction loses 0.19 points per 100 serves for every 10 points of habitual usage, measured from WTA servers whose mix drifted between matches. Shifts stay within the range servers' habits actually vary, the only range that response was measured over.
Deuce court
| 1st serve | Usage | Points won | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 50% | 53.4%±6.8 n=117 | 50% |
| Body | 16% | 46.3%±9.9 n=38 | 1% ▼ |
| T | 34% | 55.3%±7.8 n=81 | 49% ▲ |
Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.27).
Optimal mix: +0.8 per 100 first serves.
Ad court
| 1st serve | Usage | Points won | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 27% | 51.9%±8.8 n=58 | 42% ▲ |
| Body | 28% | 48.4%±8.6 n=61 | 13% ▼ |
| T | 45% | 47.0%±7.3 n=96 | 45% |
Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.67).
Optimal mix: +0.8 per 100 first serves.
Exploitability 0.78 points per 100 first serves What the optimal mix would win over the current one, both courts. More exploitable than 100% of WTA servers. Tested on matches they weren't fitted on, WTA mixes picked this way win 0.42 per 100 first serves on average.
Repeating the previous direction to the same court: −1.6±3.7 points per 100 against switching. Negative means returners read repeats. Tour-wide, repeating costs women about 0.4 points per 100 and costs men nothing, so men's returners don't measurably anticipate direction. (173 repeats, 262 switches.)
Return by serve direction
Return points won against each serve direction, compared with the tour average.
| Serve | Court | Direction | Points | Won | vs tour | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Ad court | Body | 39 | 38% | −6.0±9.6 | |
| 1st | Ad court | T | 54 | 29% | −6.2±8.2 | |
| 1st | Ad court | Wide | 34 | 27% | −7.4±9.1 | |
| 1st | Deuce court | Body | 33 | 46% | +3.1±10.3 | |
| 1st | Deuce court | T | 46 | 34% | +1.6±8.9 | |
| 1st | Deuce court | Wide | 65 | 25% | −8.5±7.4 | |
| 2nd | Ad court | Body | 52 | 51% | −4.4±9.1 | |
| 2nd | Ad court | T | 16 | 58% | +2.6±12.0 | |
| 2nd | Ad court | Wide | 20 | 56% | +2.6±11.5 | |
| 2nd | Deuce court | Body | 41 | 44% | −10.3±9.7 | |
| 2nd | Deuce court | T | 20 | 54% | −2.4±11.6 | |
| 2nd | Deuce court | Wide | 26 | 57% | +3.6±10.9 |
Signature patterns
Recurring sequences that win more than Marion Bartoli's own baseline, ranked by edge weighted by how often they're used.
Serve → +1
- Not enough data
Return
- Not enough data
Rally, consecutive own shots
- BH crosscourt → BH through the middle used 6.5% · won 50% · +6.4±10.2 vs own baseline
- BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt used 8.6% · won 47% · +3.1±9.3 vs own baseline
- BH crosscourt → FH crosscourt used 5.2% · won 48% · +3.8±10.9 vs own baseline
- FH crosscourt → FH crosscourt used 7.1% · won 46% · +2.7±9.9 vs own baseline
- BH through the middle → FH crosscourt used 5.5% · won 44% · +0.5±10.6 vs own baseline
Discovered sequences
Mined from every me → opponent → me run of three shots, with no templates. Ranked by how much more often Marion Bartoli wins the point once the sequence happens, weighted by how often it happens. Think of them as chess openings.
- BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt used 3.2% · won 49% · +5.5±9.8 vs own baseline · +3.7 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Venus Williams (1/6), Ana Ivanovic (3/7)
- BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt → BH through the middle used 2.4% · won 46% · +2.7±10.7 vs own baseline · +4.6 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Caroline Wozniacki (7/18), Dinara Safina (4/6)
- FH crosscourt → FH down the line → BH crosscourt used 1.7% · won 47% · +3.1±11.7 vs own baseline · +0.2 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Caroline Wozniacki (4/12), Dinara Safina (6/9)
- BH through the middle → FH crosscourt → FH crosscourt used 1.1% · won 45% · +1.1±13.0 vs own baseline · +2.1 vs tour on the same sequence
- FH crosscourt → FH crosscourt → FH crosscourt used 2.8% · won 44% · +0.6±10.2 vs own baseline · −3.5 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Caroline Wozniacki (6/16), Dinara Safina (8/14)
- FH through the middle → FH crosscourt → FH crosscourt used 1.3% · won 44% · +0.3±12.5 vs own baseline · −2.3 vs tour on the same sequence
Strengths and vulnerabilities
Value per 100 shots compared with the average player hitting (strengths) or facing (vulnerabilities) the same shot. Only shot types seen at least 120 times.
Hurts opponents most with
| FH to their forehand · rally | +2.4 | 203 |
| FH to the middle · rally | +1.0 | 126 |
| BH to the middle · rally | +0.6 | 138 |
| BH to their backhand · rally | −0.3 | 210 |
Most exposed to
| BH to their backhand · rally | −6.5 | 167 |
| FH to their backhand · rally | −3.1 | 134 |
| BH to the middle · rally | −1.3 | 136 |
| FH to their forehand · rally | −0.1 | 196 |
| FH to the middle · return | +1.5 | 126 |
Active players who are best at the shot in the top weakness: Maja Chwalinska, Sara Sorribes Tormo, Yulia Putintseva, Elsa Jacquemot, Caroline Wozniacki
Tactical fingerprint
Each bar shows how far a style trait is from the WTA average, in standard deviations.
| Wide serves · deuce | 50% | |
| Avg rally length | 4.7 | |
| Through the middle | 33% | |
| T serves · ad | 45% | |
| BH down the line | 22% | |
| 1st serve in | 63% | |
| Points at net | 7% | |
| Serve & volley | 0% | |
| Deep returns | 32% | |
| T serves · deuce | 34% | |
| Drop shots / shot | 0.9% | |
| Unforced errors / shot | 9.1% | |
| Point-ending shots | 20.5% | |
| Chipped returns | 3% | |
| Backhand slice | 2% | |
| Run-around forehands | 1% | |
| Forehand share | 48% | |
| Wide serves · ad | 27% | |
| FH down the line | 21% |
Plays most like
- Anna Karolina Schmiedlova 2014–2024 plan v
- Marie Bouzkova 2018–2026 plan v
- Lin Zhu 2016–2025 plan v
- Anastasia Myskina 2002–2006 plan v
- Jennifer Capriati 1990–2002 plan v
- Varvara Gracheva 2021–2026 plan v
- Kimberly Birrell 2016–2026 plan v
- Emma Raducanu 2018–2026 plan v
Closest from another era
- Varvara Gracheva 2021–2026
- Antonia Ruzic 2024–2026
- Iva Jovic 2024–2026
Charted matches
- Caroline Wozniacki v Marion Bartoli L Dubai QF · Hard · 21 Feb 2013
- Marion Bartoli v Petra Kvitova L Montreal R16 · Hard · 10 Aug 2012
- Ana Ivanovic v Marion Bartoli L Indian Wells QF · Hard · 15 Mar 2012
- Caroline Wozniacki v Marion Bartoli L Doha SF · Hard · 25 Feb 2011
- Marion Bartoli v Dinara Safina W Hobart R32 · Hard · 10 Jan 2011
- Venus Williams v Marion Bartoli L Wimbledon F · Grass · 8 Jul 2007
- Justine Henin v Marion Bartoli L Eastbourne SF · Grass · 23 Jun 2007
- Justine Henin v Marion Bartoli L Toronto R32 · Hard · 12 Aug 2003