RallyIQ

ATP · Right-handed · 4 charted matches · 2013–2019

Thiemo De Bakker

Against an average opponent

Serve points won 64.4% ±3.9 raw 63.6% · tour 63.4% · 335 points
Return points won 34.0% ±3.9 raw 31.9% · tour 36.6% · 345 points

Serve and return points won, refitted against every opponent at once so a record built on weak or strong opposition is put on the same scale. Career, all surfaces, with a 90% margin. Raw is the plain share of points won.

Shot expected value

The share of points Thiemo De Bakker goes on to win after each option in the positions they face most often, shrunk toward tour average when the sample is small. Showing the 8 most-used options; teal marks the best one with at least 30 shots.

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle

position worth 51% to the average player · 89 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH down the line 28% 54.0%±12.2 51.5%
FH through the middle 25% 48.6%±12.7 47.0%
FH crosscourt 19% 44.7%±13.4 52.7%
BH through the middle 18% 45.5%±13.7 46.8%

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side

position worth 44% to the average player · 61 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH down the line 39% 38.5%±12.1 44.7%
FH through the middle 34% 47.1%±12.8 41.5%
FH crosscourt 16% 44.4%±14.9 46.6%

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side

position worth 46% to the average player · 58 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
BH through the middle 38% 37.5%±12.3 43.7%
BH crosscourt 21% 45.4%±14.5 47.6%
BH down the line 21% 41.5%±14.3 46.4%

Serve under pressure

Deuce court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 41% 67% ▲ 70% / 73%
Body 13% 0% ▼ 65% / 63%
T 46% 33% ▼ 73% / 75%

164 normal · 9 break-point 1st serves

Ad court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 41% 50% ▲ 76% / 73%
Body 9% 4% 63% / 63%
T 50% 46% 73% / 72%

128 normal · 26 break-point 1st serves

Is the serve mix in equilibrium?

Game theory says a well-mixed server wins equally often with every direction they use. If one direction wins more, it's underused and points are being left behind. This is the minimax test Walker and Wooders ran on Wimbledon finals, applied to every charted first serve. Win rates include faults. "Optimal" allows for returners reading a habit. No measurable response (−0.05 ± 0.15 points per 100 serves for every 10 points of habitual usage), measured from ATP servers whose mix drifted between matches. Shifts stay within the range servers' habits actually vary, the only range that response was measured over.

Deuce court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide42% 58.1%±8.0 n=73
Body12% 62.0%±11.2 n=21
T46% 64.0%±7.6 n=79

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.57).

Ad court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide42% 65.8%±8.0 n=65
Body8% 59.3%±12.3 n=13
T49% 64.9%±7.6 n=76

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.37).

Repeating the previous direction to the same court: +11.3±5.2 points per 100 against switching. Negative means returners read repeats. Tour-wide, repeating costs women about 0.4 points per 100 and costs men nothing, so men's returners don't measurably anticipate direction. (132 repeats, 187 switches.)

Return by serve direction

Return points won against each serve direction, compared with the tour average.

ServeCourtDirectionPointsWonvs tour
1stAd courtBody 14 37% −0.4±11.9
1stAd courtT 52 26% −1.9±8.0
1stAd courtWide 37 26% −1.6±8.8
1stDeuce courtBody 22 33% −4.0±10.7
1stDeuce courtT 37 26% +1.1±8.8
1stDeuce courtWide 59 22% −5.7±7.2
2ndAd courtBody 16 50% +0.2±12.1
2ndAd courtT 19 49% −0.7±11.7
2ndAd courtWide 21 40% −8.2±11.3
2ndDeuce courtBody 18 49% +0.4±11.9
2ndDeuce courtT 23 56% +6.7±11.2
2ndDeuce courtWide 18 49% +0.7±11.9

Charted matches