RallyIQ

Game plan

Alejandro Tabilo v Pablo Carreno Busta

Every number combines what Alejandro Tabilo does well with what Pablo Carreno Busta allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Alejandro Tabilo wins, best of 3 55%90%: 31%–77% · best of 5: 57%
Serve points won 61.7% / 60.6% Alejandro / Pablo · tour 61.3%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 61%serve 62.3% / 60.1%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Alejandro Tabilo's record against Pablo Carreno Busta's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −4.9 on serve, −5.0 on return vs expectation (431 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerAlejandroPablo
Direction choice−0.10 ±0.09
better than 30%
−0.01 ±0.09
better than 54%
Shot selection−0.14 ±0.20
better than 34%
−0.04 ±0.12
better than 48%
Execution+0.14 ±0.46
better than 74%
+0.75 ±0.44
better than 90%
Points left on the table2.85 ±0.17
lower than 27%
2.31 ±0.13
lower than 82%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Alejandro Tabilo +1.00, Pablo Carreno Busta +0.69. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Alejandro Tabilo serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowAlejandro winsv PabloMatchupOptimal
Wide48%74%77%77.8%±4.649%
Body14%64%62%62.9%±10.41% ▼
T37%72%78%75.3%±5.350% ▲

Optimal v Pablo Carreno Busta: +0.9±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowAlejandro winsv PabloMatchupOptimal
Wide49%69%75%71.9%±5.246% ▼
Body10%62%62%61.1%±10.90% ▼
T40%76%74%78.7%±5.254% ▲

Optimal v Pablo Carreno Busta: +0.7±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +5.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Pablo Carreno Busta serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowPablo winsv AlejandroMatchupOptimal
Wide48%70%72%69.7%±5.249%
Body19%65%64%66.0%±8.76% ▼
T32%68%75%68.8%±6.845% ▲

Optimal v Alejandro Tabilo: +0.5±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowPablo winsv AlejandroMatchupOptimal
Wide48%71%78%75.9%±5.661% ▲
Body14%66%63%65.7%±9.20% ▼
T38%66%75%69.1%±6.139%

Optimal v Alejandro Tabilo: +0.4±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +4.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Alejandro Tabilo returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PabloValue
FH through the middle40%+4.3+0.1+1.7+6.0±2.4
FH slice through the middle21%−4.2−0.4−0.3−4.9±2.3
FH crosscourt15%+5.5−2.8+0.4+3.1±4.1
FH slice crosscourt10%−4.3+1.3+0.5−2.5±2.7
FH down the line10%+1.7+0.4−1.9+0.3±4.1

Lean FH through the middle: +4.5±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (278 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PabloValue
BH through the middle44%+6.4+0.6−0.3+6.7±2.1
BH crosscourt17%+8.8+1.4+2.4+12.5±3.4
BH down the line16%+4.2−1.7+1.6+4.1±4.1
BH slice through the middle11%−4.2−1.2+1.4−4.0±2.4
BH slice down the line8%−8.4−0.1±0.0−8.5±3.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +8.0±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (418 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PabloValue
FH through the middle43%−3.5−0.5+0.7−3.3±2.7
FH crosscourt35%−0.2−0.8−0.1−1.0±4.4
FH down the line14%−1.8+3.3+3.3+4.8±4.2
FH slice through the middle8%−12.7−0.6−0.4−13.6±1.7

Lean FH down the line: +7.0±4.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (106 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PabloValue
BH through the middle56%−2.9+1.6+0.6−0.7±2.1
BH crosscourt28%+1.0+1.0−1.4+0.6±3.2
BH down the line14%−0.2−2.9+1.3−1.8±4.4
FH through the middle2%−2.9+0.4+0.7−1.8±1.8

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.1±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (244 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Pablo Carreno Busta returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlejandroValue
FH through the middle40%+4.3+1.3−2.6+3.0±2.4
FH slice through the middle20%−4.2−0.3−0.3−4.8±2.2
FH crosscourt18%+5.5+0.9+1.9+8.3±4.2
FH down the line11%+1.7+2.0−3.8−0.1±4.5
FH slice down the line5%−4.3+0.8−0.3−3.8±3.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +7.0±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (638 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlejandroValue
BH through the middle40%+6.4+1.6+1.3+9.4±2.2
BH crosscourt25%+8.8−0.1+0.9+9.6±3.3
BH slice through the middle18%−4.2−1.1+1.4−4.0±2.4
BH down the line8%+4.2+3.0−2.1+5.1±4.6
BH slice crosscourt6%+0.5−2.3+1.9+0.1±3.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.1±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (665 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlejandroValue
FH through the middle51%−3.5+0.7−0.3−3.0±2.6
FH crosscourt29%−0.2−1.4+0.1−1.5±4.3
FH down the line19%−1.8−0.1−4.3−6.2±4.7

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.7±3.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (195 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlejandroValue
BH crosscourt40%+1.0−1.7−0.7−1.4±2.9
BH through the middle36%−2.9+0.2+1.7−1.0±2.2
BH down the line12%−0.2+3.3−3.3−0.2±4.8
FH through the middle7%−2.9−1.3−0.3−4.5±2.3
FH inside-out3%+1.0−0.5−4.3−3.8±3.4

Lean BH down the line: +1.3±4.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (495 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on clay. Each player's clay record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Alejandro Tabilo

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return +1+7.4±6.1+1.7+5.7
FH to their backhand · rally+6.7±2.4+3.0+3.8
BH to their forehand · return+6.0±5.2+2.7+3.3
BH to their forehand · rally+6.0±3.8+2.4+3.6
FH to the middle · return +1+5.1±3.6+2.0+3.1
BH to their forehand · serve +1+4.4±6.2+4.9−0.5

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · serve +1−3.1±3.3−2.6−0.6
FH to their forehand · return +1−2.0±5.3−2.9+0.9
BH to the middle · rally−1.4±2.0−1.3−0.1
FH to their backhand · return−1.2±4.7−1.8+0.5
BH to their backhand · return−1.0±3.6−3.1+2.1

Pablo Carreno Busta

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return +1+7.1±6.5+2.6+4.5
BH to their forehand · rally+6.9±3.9+3.3+3.6
BH to their forehand · serve +1+5.1±6.5+1.0+4.1
FH to their backhand · return +1+4.3±4.6+2.0+2.4
BH to the middle · return+3.8±2.4+1.7+2.1
FH to their forehand · serve +1+3.6±4.0+0.6+3.0

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to the middle · rally−4.2±3.2±0.0−4.1
FH to their forehand · return−3.4±5.5+3.2−6.6
FH to their forehand · rally−2.6±3.0+2.7−5.3
BH to their backhand · return−2.6±3.8+1.0−3.6
BH to their forehand · return−1.7±5.3−0.5−1.2

Against Pablo Carreno Busta-like opponents

Alejandro Tabilo vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–63.5%35.0%
Players most similar to Pablo Carreno Busta3 60.0%28.9%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Casper Ruud, Brandon Nakashima, Valentin Vacherot, Tommy Paul, Karen Khachanov, Jaume Munar, Miomir Kecmanovic, Luca Nardi, Bernabe Zapata Miralles. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.