RallyIQ

Game plan

Aleksandar Kovacevic v Adrian Andreev

Every number combines what Aleksandar Kovacevic does well with what Adrian Andreev allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Aleksandar Kovacevic wins, best of 3 63%90%: 32%–87% · best of 5: 66%
Serve points won 64.8% / 62.1% Aleksandar / Adrian · tour 63.8%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 63%serve 64.8% / 62.1%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Aleksandar Kovacevic's record against Adrian Andreev's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads. A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerAleksandarAdrian
Direction choice−0.12 ±0.10
better than 26%
+0.03 ±0.12
better than 66%
Shot selection−0.31 ±0.25
better than 22%
−0.07 ±0.36
better than 44%
Execution−0.76 ±0.71
better than 34%
−1.22 ±0.62
better than 18%
Points left on the table2.66 ±0.17
lower than 43%
2.25 ±0.09
lower than 88%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Aleksandar Kovacevic serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowAleksandar winsv AdrianMatchupOptimal
Wide43%74%64%65.7%±10.736% ▼
Body5%67%58%62.6%±17.80% ▼
T51%79%68%71.9%±8.864% ▲

Optimal v Adrian Andreev: +0.4±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +3.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowAleksandar winsv AdrianMatchupOptimal
Wide44%77%65%69.6%±9.836% ▼
Body5%66%59%62.3%±17.50% ▼
T51%75%69%72.1%±9.864% ▲

Optimal v Adrian Andreev: +0.3±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Adrian Andreev serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowAdrian winsv AleksandarMatchupOptimal
Wide53%63%77%68.2%±9.142% ▼
Body2%63%63%62.9%±16.40% ▼
T45%73%80%78.7%±8.158% ▲

Optimal v Aleksandar Kovacevic: +0.2±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +5.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowAdrian winsv AleksandarMatchupOptimal
Wide47%69%73%69.2%±10.239% ▼
Body5%64%64%65.1%±15.30% ▼
T48%67%74%70.0%±9.461% ▲

Optimal v Aleksandar Kovacevic: +0.3±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +0.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Aleksandar Kovacevic returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AdrianValue
FH through the middle51%+4.3−2.1+3.4+5.6±3.1
FH down the line20%+1.7+2.6+4.1+8.3±4.3
FH crosscourt18%+5.5−0.7+2.3+7.2±3.7
FH slice through the middle8%−4.2−0.7+0.9−4.0±2.1
FH slice down the line3%−4.3−2.3+2.4−4.2±2.5

Lean FH down the line: +2.9±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (164 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AdrianValue
BH slice through the middle34%−4.2−1.9+1.4−4.7±2.4
BH through the middle19%+6.4+0.7+2.3+9.4±2.8
BH slice crosscourt16%+0.5−0.3+1.0+1.2±2.5
BH crosscourt13%+8.8+1.5+2.9+13.2±3.4
BH slice down the line13%−8.4+1.1±0.0−7.2±2.3

Lean BH crosscourt: +11.7±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (167 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AdrianValue
BH through the middle27%−2.9−0.6+1.3−2.2±2.6
FH through the middle27%−2.9−0.4+1.1−2.1±2.3
BH crosscourt14%+1.0+0.3±0.0+1.3±3.1
FH inside-out13%+1.0+0.2+1.1+2.2±3.4
BH down the line11%−0.2−4.1+1.6−2.7±4.4

Lean FH inside-out: +3.3±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (132 returns charted)

Adrian Andreev returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AleksandarValue
FH through the middle46%+4.3+2.0−1.5+4.8±3.0
FH crosscourt23%+5.5+0.9−3.8+2.6±4.0
FH down the line22%+1.7+5.3−3.5+3.5±4.2
FH slice crosscourt9%−4.3+0.7±0.0−3.7±1.3

Lean FH through the middle: +1.6±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (65 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AleksandarValue
BH through the middle53%+6.4+2.5−1.0+7.9±2.8
BH crosscourt29%+8.8+2.5−1.0+10.3±3.6
BH down the line7%+4.2+0.9−3.3+1.9±3.9
BH slice through the middle7%−4.2+1.0−1.0−4.2±2.1
BH slice down the line3%−8.4+1.4−0.7−7.7±2.3

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.5±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (150 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AleksandarValue
BH through the middle62%−2.9+0.5+0.6−1.8±2.5
BH crosscourt32%+1.0−0.6−1.3−0.9±3.3
BH down the line6%−0.2+0.5+2.5+2.9±3.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +0.4±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (128 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Aleksandar Kovacevic

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · rally+4.9±3.3−0.1+5.0
BH to the middle · return+2.7±3.7−0.3+3.0
FH to the middle · return+2.6±3.9−1.9+4.5
BH to the middle · rally+2.2±3.2−0.3+2.5
FH to their backhand · serve +1+0.7±5.2+0.4+0.3
FH to their forehand · serve +1+0.3±5.8+0.8−0.6

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · serve +1−7.8±5.0−7.9±0.0
FH to their forehand · rally−4.3±4.2−0.8−3.5
BH to their backhand · rally−1.9±3.4−2.2+0.2
FH to their backhand · rally−1.4±4.0−2.4+1.0
FH to their forehand · serve +1+0.3±5.8+0.8−0.6

Adrian Andreev

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · rally+7.5±6.6+7.4+0.1
FH to their backhand · rally+5.7±3.9+4.4+1.3
BH to the middle · rally+4.5±2.9+3.1+1.4
FH to the middle · rally+3.6±3.5+3.5+0.1
FH to their forehand · rally+2.9±4.1+1.5+1.4
BH to their backhand · rally+0.8±3.4−0.3+1.1

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · serve +1−5.6±5.6−4.9−0.7
BH to their backhand · return−4.8±4.8−1.2−3.6
BH to their backhand · serve +1−3.0±5.0−3.1+0.1
FH to their backhand · serve +1−1.2±5.0−0.1−1.0
BH to the middle · return−1.0±3.1+0.8−1.8

Against Adrian Andreev-like opponents

Aleksandar Kovacevic vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–65.1%32.5%