RallyIQ

Game plan

Alexander Bublik v Yoshihito Nishioka

Every number combines what Alexander Bublik does well with what Yoshihito Nishioka allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Alexander Bublik wins, best of 3 78%90%: 54%–92% · best of 5: 83%
Serve points won 64.9% / 58.9% Alexander / Yoshihito · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 77%serve 65.6% / 59.7%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Alexander Bublik's record against Yoshihito Nishioka's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −4.3 on serve, +5.0 on return vs expectation (543 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerAlexanderYoshihito
Direction choice−0.07 ±0.06
better than 39%
−0.29 ±0.10
better than 6%
Shot selection−0.42 ±0.11
better than 15%
−0.18 ±0.14
better than 32%
Execution−0.93 ±0.38
better than 26%
+0.62 ±0.43
better than 87%
Points left on the table2.88 ±0.13
lower than 26%
3.00 ±0.19
lower than 19%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Alexander Bublik −0.30, Yoshihito Nishioka +0.60. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Alexander Bublik serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowAlexander winsv YoshihitoMatchupOptimal
Wide41%77%79%82.9%±3.054% ▲
Body6%60%55%50.9%±9.70% ▼
T53%76%80%80.8%±3.646% ▼

Optimal v Yoshihito Nishioka: +0.9±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +3.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowAlexander winsv YoshihitoMatchupOptimal
Wide49%80%78%84.6%±3.245% ▼
Body9%65%62%64.0%±9.60% ▼
T42%72%77%77.0%±3.955% ▲

Optimal v Yoshihito Nishioka: +0.7±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +5.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Yoshihito Nishioka serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowYoshihito winsv AlexanderMatchupOptimal
Wide25%62%74%63.6%±6.025%
Body22%57%66%59.7%±6.89% ▼
T53%61%78%64.8%±4.166% ▲

Optimal v Alexander Bublik: +0.3±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowYoshihito winsv AlexanderMatchupOptimal
Wide55%63%76%66.7%±4.268% ▲
Body16%60%64%61.1%±7.63% ▼
T29%75%72%74.7%±5.029%

Optimal v Alexander Bublik: +0.5±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +6.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Alexander Bublik returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YoshihitoValue
FH slice through the middle44%−4.2+0.1+1.2−2.9±1.9
FH through the middle19%+4.3−1.8+3.3+5.8±2.2
FH slice down the line12%−4.3+1.0+1.3−1.9±2.4
FH slice crosscourt10%−4.3−1.3+0.4−5.2±2.5
FH crosscourt9%+5.5−1.8+2.1+5.8±4.0

Lean FH through the middle: +6.5±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (1535 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YoshihitoValue
BH through the middle38%+6.4+1.6+4.2+12.3±1.6
BH crosscourt25%+8.8−1.0+5.0+12.8±2.6
BH slice through the middle16%−4.2+0.1+0.9−3.2±2.2
BH slice crosscourt10%+0.5−4.3+3.2−0.6±2.9
BH down the line8%+4.2+3.5+0.8+8.6±4.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.2±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (1329 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YoshihitoValue
FH through the middle31%−3.5−4.8+2.8−5.5±2.5
FH crosscourt21%−0.2+1.0+5.0+5.7±4.2
FH slice through the middle21%−12.7−0.3−0.1−13.0±1.9
FH down the line11%−1.8−5.0−4.7−11.4±4.7
FH slice crosscourt7%−12.5+1.2±0.0−11.3±2.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +11.7±3.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (420 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YoshihitoValue
BH through the middle50%−2.9−0.3+0.2−2.9±1.8
BH crosscourt31%+1.0−1.8+0.8±0.0±2.5
BH down the line12%−0.2+1.5+4.3+5.6±4.8
FH through the middle2%−2.9−0.9+2.8−1.0±2.0
FH inside-in2%+0.6−1.2+5.0+4.3±3.8

Lean BH down the line: +6.7±4.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (834 returns charted)

Yoshihito Nishioka returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexanderValue
FH through the middle40%+4.3+3.3+0.7+8.3±2.1
FH crosscourt23%+5.5+0.7+1.8+8.0±3.8
FH slice through the middle17%−4.2+2.3−1.8−3.7±2.0
FH down the line9%+1.7−0.1−1.6±0.0±4.2
FH slice crosscourt7%−4.3+3.3+1.0±0.0±2.8

Lean FH through the middle: +3.9±1.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (435 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexanderValue
BH through the middle38%+6.4+0.5+2.2+9.0±1.9
BH crosscourt22%+8.8±0.0−1.2+7.6±3.2
BH slice through the middle21%−4.2−0.6−2.6−7.3±2.1
BH slice down the line7%−8.4+1.7−2.7−9.4±3.4
BH down the line6%+4.2−4.8−0.2−0.8±4.0

Lean BH through the middle: +6.6±1.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (612 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexanderValue
FH through the middle49%−3.5+1.5+0.1−1.8±2.2
FH crosscourt38%−0.2+0.3+0.5+0.6±3.9
FH down the line9%−1.8−1.0−1.3−4.1±4.3
FH slice through the middle4%−12.7+0.5−1.9−14.1±2.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.2±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (261 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexanderValue
BH through the middle53%−2.9+2.9+0.4+0.5±1.8
BH crosscourt29%+1.0+2.5+0.7+4.2±3.1
BH down the line9%−0.2+0.7−2.5−2.0±4.1
BH slice through the middle4%−11.3−0.5−2.6−14.4±2.2
FH through the middle3%−2.9+1.8+0.1−1.0±1.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.7±2.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (286 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Alexander Bublik

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return+4.6±1.2−0.1+4.8
FH slice to their backhand · rally+4.4±3.6+1.6+2.8
BH to their forehand · serve +1+3.9±4.0+2.6+1.2
BH to their forehand · return+3.5±2.9+0.4+3.1
BH to their backhand · return+2.7±2.2−1.0+3.7
FH to their forehand · serve +1+2.6±2.3+1.2+1.4

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return−6.5±3.7−1.8−4.8
BH to their backhand · return +1−4.4±2.6−0.8−3.6
BH slice to their backhand · rally−4.1±2.1−4.0−0.1
BH slice to the middle · rally−3.8±1.9−3.2−0.5
FH to the middle · serve +1−2.9±2.2−1.4−1.4

Yoshihito Nishioka

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return +1+10.3±4.0+2.7+7.6
FH to their backhand · return+3.5±2.8+2.3+1.2
FH to their backhand · rally+3.1±1.5+1.6+1.5
BH to their forehand · return+2.8±3.4+3.1−0.2
FH to the middle · rally+2.1±1.3+2.9−0.8
BH to the middle · return+2.1±1.3+1.2+0.9

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · serve +1−5.1±1.9−2.2−3.0
BH to their backhand · return−4.3±2.7−2.9−1.4
FH to their forehand · return−3.8±3.9−1.8−2.0
BH to their backhand · serve +1−3.6±2.4±0.0−3.6
BH slice to their backhand · rally−3.2±2.2−3.0−0.3

Against Yoshihito Nishioka-like opponents

Alexander Bublik vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–63.6%33.6%
Players most similar to Yoshihito Nishioka3 58.8%40.5%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Cameron Norrie, Gael Monfils, Mattia Bellucci, Albert Ramos, Dominik Koepfer, Rafael Nadal, Federico Delbonis, Pablo Cuevas, Guido Pella, Gaston Gaudio. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.