RallyIQ

Game plan

Belinda Bencic v Svetlana Kuznetsova

Every number combines what Belinda Bencic does well with what Svetlana Kuznetsova allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Belinda Bencic wins, best of 3 46%90%: 19%–76% · best of 5: 46%
Serve points won 55.0% / 55.6% Belinda / Svetlana · tour 55.0%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 51%serve 55.5% / 55.3%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Belinda Bencic's record against Svetlana Kuznetsova's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −8.4 on serve, −1.0 on return vs expectation (260 points); head-to-head: +1.4 on serve, −3.1 on return vs expectation (235 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerBelindaSvetlana
Direction choice+0.11 ±0.04
better than 74%
+0.24 ±0.09
better than 90%
Shot selection+0.12 ±0.07
better than 58%
+0.19 ±0.15
better than 64%
Execution+0.91 ±0.34
better than 89%
+0.37 ±0.49
better than 75%
Points left on the table2.41 ±0.06
lower than 75%
2.35 ±0.12
lower than 81%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Belinda Bencic serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowBelinda winsv SvetlanaMatchupOptimal
Wide50%66%63%62.6%±4.835% ▼
Body18%65%64%71.0%±6.033% ▲
T32%71%71%73.7%±4.932%

Optimal v Svetlana Kuznetsova: +0.4±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +6.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowBelinda winsv SvetlanaMatchupOptimal
Wide42%70%63%68.3%±5.139% ▼
Body14%63%57%64.5%±7.42% ▼
T44%69%62%66.3%±5.059% ▲

Optimal v Svetlana Kuznetsova: +0.3±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Svetlana Kuznetsova serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowSvetlana winsv BelindaMatchupOptimal
Wide47%66%67%67.5%±4.562% ▲
Body12%55%55%52.7%±7.60% ▼
T40%61%72%66.5%±5.238% ▼

Optimal v Belinda Bencic: +0.5±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowSvetlana winsv BelindaMatchupOptimal
Wide50%63%69%66.6%±4.865% ▲
Body12%56%53%53.5%±8.00% ▼
T38%59%67%62.3%±5.435% ▼

Optimal v Belinda Bencic: +0.6±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Belinda Bencic returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SvetlanaValue
FH through the middle32%+4.2±0.0+1.0+5.2±2.1
FH slice through the middle26%−6.7−0.4+1.6−5.5±2.2
FH crosscourt18%+5.3+0.9−0.6+5.6±3.6
FH down the line13%+1.5+2.7+1.1+5.4±4.0
FH slice crosscourt9%−6.6−0.2−0.5−7.3±2.6

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.6±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (1174 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SvetlanaValue
BH through the middle47%+6.0+0.5+1.3+7.8±1.9
BH crosscourt34%+7.7−2.0+1.6+7.3±2.7
BH down the line9%+2.2+1.2+3.4+6.7±4.6
BH slice through the middle5%−6.2±0.0−1.1−7.4±2.5
BH slice crosscourt4%−4.2−1.8+1.1−4.9±3.0

Lean BH through the middle: +1.8±1.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (857 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SvetlanaValue
FH through the middle44%−3.2+0.6+0.9−1.7±2.7
FH crosscourt25%+0.5−2.7±0.0−2.1±4.2
FH down the line23%−0.6+3.2−3.9−1.3±5.0
FH slice through the middle5%−15.2+0.2+1.1−13.9±2.2
FH slice crosscourt3%−14.9+0.3±0.0−14.6±1.5

Lean FH down the line: +1.4±4.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (383 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SvetlanaValue
BH crosscourt44%+1.5+2.8+0.4+4.7±2.9
BH through the middle41%−2.6−0.3+1.1−1.8±2.3
BH down the line14%−0.5+5.1+2.6+7.2±5.1
FH through the middle1%−2.7+0.3+0.9−1.5±2.0

Lean BH down the line: +4.9±4.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (525 returns charted)

Svetlana Kuznetsova returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BelindaValue
FH through the middle44%+4.2+1.4+1.2+6.8±1.9
FH crosscourt27%+5.3+2.0+1.7+9.0±3.3
FH slice through the middle11%−6.7+1.2−0.9−6.4±2.4
FH down the line10%+1.5+2.3−4.7−0.8±4.1
FH slice crosscourt7%−6.6−0.3−0.5−7.4±2.8

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.1±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (597 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BelindaValue
BH through the middle36%+6.0+1.7−0.8+6.9±2.0
BH crosscourt30%+7.7−2.6−2.5+2.6±2.9
BH slice through the middle13%−6.2+0.3−0.5−6.5±2.4
BH down the line11%+2.2+0.6−2.4+0.3±4.2
BH slice crosscourt6%−4.2+0.2−2.8−6.7±3.0

Lean BH through the middle: +5.5±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (541 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BelindaValue
FH through the middle46%−3.2+2.0+0.9−0.2±2.6
FH crosscourt29%+0.5−0.1+4.1+4.5±3.8
FH down the line25%−0.6+3.8−2.8+0.4±4.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.2±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (129 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BelindaValue
BH crosscourt38%+1.5+1.6+0.3+3.4±2.9
BH through the middle25%−2.6±0.0−0.6−3.3±2.2
BH down the line10%−0.5+4.1+1.9+5.5±4.8
FH through the middle10%−2.7+0.7+0.9−1.1±2.3
FH inside-in9%+0.7−6.1+4.1−1.2±4.0

Lean BH down the line: +4.8±4.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (437 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on clay. Each player's clay record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Belinda Bencic

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return+11.5±5.6+9.1+2.5
BH to their forehand · rally+8.1±4.7+6.5+1.6
FH to their backhand · return +1+6.0±5.0+3.6+2.4
BH to their backhand · serve +1+5.5±4.1+4.7+0.8
FH to their backhand · serve +1+4.7±4.5+1.3+3.4
BH to their forehand · serve +1+4.2±5.9+4.4−0.1

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · serve +1−5.1±4.5−2.5−2.6
FH to their forehand · return−2.7±5.3−0.5−2.2
FH to their backhand · rally−2.3±3.8−0.5−1.8
FH to their forehand · return +1−1.4±4.7−0.6−0.8
FH to the middle · return−1.3±3.2−2.9+1.6

Svetlana Kuznetsova

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · serve +1+5.5±4.6+1.5+4.0
BH to their backhand · serve +1+4.7±4.0+1.3+3.4
BH to the middle · serve +1+3.9±3.0+3.2+0.6
BH to the middle · return +1+3.3±3.0+1.3+2.0
FH to the middle · serve +1+2.9±3.2+1.5+1.4
FH to their backhand · return +1+2.7±4.9+2.0+0.7

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to their forehand · rally−4.3±4.8−5.0+0.7
BH to their forehand · rally−4.1±5.0−3.8−0.2
BH to the middle · rally−3.4±2.7−2.0−1.4
BH to their forehand · return−2.8±5.6−0.3−2.5
FH to their forehand · serve +1−2.5±4.6−4.3+1.8

Against Svetlana Kuznetsova-like opponents

Belinda Bencic vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–59.6%43.7%
Players most similar to Svetlana Kuznetsova2 51.5%42.2%
Svetlana Kuznetsova (charted head-to-head)2 60.2%40.7%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Cristina Bucsa, Sorana Cirstea, Daria Kasatkina, Victoria Azarenka, Shelby Rogers, Simona Halep, Kim Clijsters, Christina Mchale, Ana Ivanovic, Elena Dementieva. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head