Game plan

Botic Van De Zandschulp v Andy Murray

Every number combines what Botic Van De Zandschulp does well with what Andy Murray allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Botic Van De Zandschulp wins, best of 3 25%90%: 10%–48% · best of 5: 20%

Serve points won 59.1% / 64.3% Botic / Andy · tour 63.4%

Strengths only, no similarity priors 32%serve 59.6% / 63.2%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Botic Van De Zandschulp's record against Andy Murray's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −1.6 on serve, −3.7 on return vs expectation (1311 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

Career	Botic	Andy
Direction choice	−0.09 ±0.03 better than 32%	+0.14 ±0.03 better than 87%
Shot selection	+0.08 ±0.08 better than 62%	−0.45 ±0.05 better than 13%
Execution	−1.07 ±0.25 better than 23%	+0.94 ±0.16 better than 95%
Points left on the table	2.53 ±0.06 lower than 58%	2.23 ±0.05 lower than 90%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Botic Van De Zandschulp +0.04, Andy Murray +0.33. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Botic Van De Zandschulp serving

Deuce court

1st serve	Now	Botic wins	v Andy	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	41%	72%	70%	69.0%±2.5	40% ▼
Body	12%	63%	59%	59.1%±4.7	0% ▼
T	47%	77%	76%	77.6%±2.3	60% ▲

Optimal v Andy Murray: +0.8±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +5.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serve	Now	Botic wins	v Andy	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	37%	72%	71%	70.5%±2.8	37%
Body	15%	58%	57%	51.7%±4.8	2% ▼
T	47%	70%	68%	66.1%±2.6	61% ▲

Optimal v Andy Murray: +1.3±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +4.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Andy Murray serving

Deuce court

1st serve	Now	Andy wins	v Botic	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	47%	71%	72%	69.4%±2.4	60% ▲
Body	8%	67%	63%	66.8%±4.6	0% ▼
T	46%	80%	70%	75.7%±2.3	40% ▼

Optimal v Botic Van De Zandschulp: +0.1±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +3.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serve	Now	Andy wins	v Botic	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	47%	77%	71%	74.5%±2.4	60% ▲
Body	8%	61%	64%	62.1%±5.2	0% ▼
T	45%	70%	69%	66.8%±2.7	40% ▼

Optimal v Botic Van De Zandschulp: +0.1±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +4.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Botic Van De Zandschulp returning

1st serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Andy	Value
FH through the middle	48%	+4.3	+1.5	+1.2	+6.9±1.1
FH crosscourt	22%	+5.5	−3.9	+1.3	+2.9±2.3
FH down the line	16%	+1.7	−1.6	+0.2	+0.3±2.5
FH slice through the middle	9%	−4.2	−1.9	+1.4	−4.7±1.6
FH slice down the line	3%	−4.3	−4.2	+1.1	−7.4±3.0

Lean FH through the middle: +3.7±0.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (2055 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Andy	Value
BH through the middle	42%	+6.4	−0.3	−0.1	+6.0±1.2
BH crosscourt	28%	+8.8	−2.7	+0.9	+7.0±1.9
BH slice through the middle	14%	−4.2	−1.4	−0.4	−6.0±1.4
BH down the line	8%	+4.2	−0.9	+0.1	+3.4±3.3
BH slice crosscourt	6%	+0.5	−3.3	+0.5	−2.2±2.3

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.5±1.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (2166 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Andy	Value
FH through the middle	53%	−3.5	−0.4	+0.7	−3.2±1.7
FH crosscourt	31%	−0.2	−1.8	+1.5	−0.5±3.1
FH down the line	14%	−1.8	−5.4	+2.6	−4.6±3.7
FH slice through the middle	2%	−12.7	−1.2	−0.4	−14.3±2.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.3±2.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (449 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Andy	Value
BH through the middle	48%	−2.9	−2.0	+1.1	−3.7±1.1
BH crosscourt	41%	+1.0	−4.5	+1.8	−1.6±1.5
BH down the line	6%	−0.2	+0.3	+1.3	+1.4±3.9
FH through the middle	2%	−2.9	−0.4	+0.7	−2.6±1.8
FH inside-out	1%	+1.0	−1.9	+2.6	+1.6±2.5

Lean BH down the line: +3.9±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (1291 returns charted)

Andy Murray returning

1st serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Botic	Value
FH through the middle	42%	+4.3	+1.4	−0.1	+5.5±1.1
FH down the line	17%	+1.7	+6.2	−2.1	+5.8±2.4
FH crosscourt	16%	+5.5	+1.9	−3.5	+3.9±2.4
FH slice through the middle	14%	−4.2	+2.7	−1.6	−3.1±1.3
FH slice down the line	5%	−4.3	+3.1	−3.0	−4.3±2.6
BH through the middle	0%	+6.6	+0.4	+0.6	+7.5±2.1

Lean BH through the middle: +4.3±2.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (5314 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Botic	Value
BH crosscourt	27%	+8.8	+4.6	−2.8	+10.6±1.7
BH through the middle	25%	+6.4	+2.2	+0.6	+9.3±1.2
BH slice through the middle	25%	−4.2	+2.7	−2.8	−4.3±1.4
BH slice crosscourt	15%	+0.5	+2.4	−4.7	−1.8±2.1
BH slice down the line	4%	−8.4	+0.9	−3.1	−10.6±3.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +7.2±1.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (4642 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Botic	Value
FH through the middle	43%	−3.5	+1.6	+0.7	−1.2±1.5
FH down the line	28%	−1.8	+2.5	−0.4	+0.3±3.0
FH crosscourt	23%	−0.2	+1.9	−2.5	−0.8±3.0
BH through the middle	3%	+0.1	−1.3	+0.8	−0.4±1.7
BH inside-in	1%	+2.5	+2.7	−1.6	+3.6±2.8

Lean BH inside-in: +4.2±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (1297 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Botic	Value
BH crosscourt	57%	+1.0	+1.7	−1.6	+1.1±1.8
BH through the middle	29%	−2.9	+0.1	+0.8	−2.0±1.3
BH down the line	7%	−0.2	+2.4	−0.1	+2.1±4.2
BH slice crosscourt	3%	−4.0	−1.9	−2.5	−8.4±2.4
BH slice through the middle	2%	−11.3	−1.4	−0.9	−13.6±2.4

Lean BH down the line: +2.5±4.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (2339 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Botic Van De Zandschulp

Favour

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
FH drop shot to their backhand · serve +1	+5.9±5.2	+0.3	+5.6
FH slice to the middle · return +1	+5.3±2.5	+2.0	+3.3
FH drop shot to their backhand · rally	+4.2±4.1	−2.3	+6.4
BH volley to the middle · rally	+3.5±4.8	+1.9	+1.7
BH slice to their forehand · return +1	+3.2±3.0	+2.5	+0.6
FH to the middle · return +1	+3.0±1.4	+2.0	+1.1

Avoid

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
BH volley to their forehand · rally	−5.8±4.3	−5.3	−0.5
FH slice to their backhand · rally	−3.8±2.9	−1.7	−2.1
BH volley to their backhand · rally	−3.7±4.1	−3.8	+0.1
BH slice to their forehand · return	−3.6±3.0	−0.7	−2.9
FH slice to their backhand · return	−3.4±2.9	−4.4	+1.0

Andy Murray

Favour

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
FH slice to the middle · rally	+5.4±2.1	+3.6	+1.8
FH to the middle · return +1	+3.0±1.4	+0.7	+2.3
BH drop shot to their forehand · rally	+2.6±4.5	+2.7	−0.1
BH lob to the middle · return +1	+2.5±2.3	+2.2	+0.3
FH to their backhand · return	+2.5±1.7	+4.1	−1.6
FH slice to their backhand · rally	+2.2±3.0	+2.7	−0.5

Avoid

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
FH drop shot to their backhand · rally	−6.2±4.9	−1.2	−5.0
FH volley to their forehand · rally	−5.7±4.0	+3.0	−8.7
FH volley to their backhand · rally	−4.9±4.5	−1.1	−3.8
FH volley to their forehand · serve +1	−4.1±5.5	+1.5	−5.6
Smash to their backhand · rally	−3.9±4.0	−0.8	−3.1

Against Andy Murray-like opponents

Botic Van De Zandschulp v	Matches	Serve pts won	Return pts won
All charted opponents	–	62.1%	37.2%
Players most similar to Andy Murray	8	58.2%	31.7%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Learner Tien, Daniil Medvedev, Novak Djokovic, Karen Khachanov, Laslo Djere, Nishesh Basavareddy, Richard Gasquet, Andreas Seppi, Marcos Baghdatis, David Nalbandian. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.