RallyIQ

Game plan

Dusan Lajovic v Yannick Hanfmann

Every number combines what Dusan Lajovic does well with what Yannick Hanfmann allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Dusan Lajovic wins, best of 3 24%90%: 8%–51% · best of 5: 19%
Serve points won 59.0% / 64.6% Dusan / Yannick · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 32%serve 60.6% / 64.2%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Dusan Lajovic's record against Yannick Hanfmann's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −7.0 on serve, −1.8 on return vs expectation (786 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerDusanYannick
Direction choice±0.00 ±0.10
better than 57%
+0.01 ±0.14
better than 58%
Shot selection−0.28 ±0.16
better than 25%
+0.22 ±0.32
better than 74%
Execution+0.03 ±0.42
better than 70%
−0.66 ±0.91
better than 38%
Points left on the table2.65 ±0.16
lower than 46%
2.68 ±0.23
lower than 41%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Dusan Lajovic serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowDusan winsv YannickMatchupOptimal
Wide48%65%76%69.1%±6.861% ▲
Body10%61%63%60.8%±11.710%
T43%67%73%65.1%±7.629% ▼

Optimal v Yannick Hanfmann: +0.7±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowDusan winsv YannickMatchupOptimal
Wide57%66%75%69.5%±6.770% ▲
Body11%64%71%71.8%±10.711%
T32%63%78%69.5%±7.919% ▼

Optimal v Yannick Hanfmann: +0.2±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving body every time would read +2.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Yannick Hanfmann serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowYannick winsv DusanMatchupOptimal
Wide40%61%77%65.7%±6.936% ▼
Body9%53%71%61.2%±11.90% ▼
T51%73%75%72.5%±6.364% ▲

Optimal v Dusan Lajovic: +0.5±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +3.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowYannick winsv DusanMatchupOptimal
Wide55%64%75%66.6%±6.649% ▼
Body8%55%67%60.0%±13.20% ▼
T38%68%69%65.3%±7.751% ▲

Optimal v Dusan Lajovic: +0.4±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Dusan Lajovic returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YannickValue
FH through the middle46%+4.3+1.6+3.5+9.3±2.5
FH crosscourt27%+5.5+0.1+2.6+8.2±4.2
FH slice through the middle11%−4.2−0.3−0.3−4.8±2.3
FH down the line10%+1.7+1.2+0.3+3.1±4.5
FH slice crosscourt4%−4.3±0.0±0.0−4.3±1.8

Lean FH through the middle: +3.3±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (533 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YannickValue
BH through the middle28%+6.4+2.6+2.8+11.8±2.4
BH slice through the middle24%−4.2+0.6+0.1−3.5±2.3
BH crosscourt23%+8.8−0.1+3.1+11.8±3.3
BH slice crosscourt16%+0.5−1.1+1.1+0.5±2.8
BH down the line7%+4.2−2.1+1.1+3.3±4.6

Lean BH through the middle: +6.6±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (727 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YannickValue
FH through the middle46%−3.5+2.4+0.3−0.8±2.9
FH crosscourt36%−0.2+0.8+3.6+4.1±4.4
FH down the line16%−1.8+0.6+2.4+1.3±4.6
FH slice through the middle3%−12.7−1.0±0.0−13.7±1.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.2±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (187 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YannickValue
BH through the middle26%−2.9+0.9+1.6−0.4±2.5
BH crosscourt23%+1.0−0.7−0.5−0.1±3.2
FH through the middle18%−2.9+0.7+0.3−1.9±2.4
FH inside-in13%+0.6−0.9+3.6+3.2±4.4
FH inside-out9%+1.0±0.0+2.4+3.4±3.7

Lean FH inside-out: +4.1±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (462 returns charted)

Yannick Hanfmann returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DusanValue
FH through the middle60%+4.3+1.0+2.5+7.8±2.5
FH crosscourt21%+5.5−0.2+1.9+7.1±4.2
FH down the line9%+1.7−0.4+2.7+4.0±4.0
FH slice through the middle6%−4.2+0.1+0.5−3.6±2.1
FH slice down the line3%−4.3−1.0±0.0−5.3±1.4

Lean FH through the middle: +1.6±1.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (186 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DusanValue
BH crosscourt38%+8.8−1.8+2.6+9.6±3.0
BH through the middle38%+6.4+0.5+1.9+8.8±2.4
BH slice through the middle9%−4.2−0.1−0.5−4.8±2.3
BH down the line8%+4.2+0.8−0.9+4.1±4.2
BH slice crosscourt7%+0.5−1.9+0.2−1.2±2.8

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.8±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (208 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DusanValue
FH through the middle64%−3.5−1.5+1.2−3.8±2.9
FH crosscourt36%−0.2+5.7+0.8+6.3±4.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +6.4±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (64 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DusanValue
BH through the middle48%−2.9+0.9−0.3−2.3±2.2
BH crosscourt39%+1.0+0.2−0.9+0.3±2.9
BH down the line8%−0.2+1.5+2.7+4.0±4.4
FH through the middle5%−2.9+0.5+1.2−1.2±2.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.0±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (151 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Dusan Lajovic

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return+6.4±2.0+2.8+3.6
FH to their forehand · return+4.6±4.0+0.4+4.2
FH to the middle · return+4.4±2.1+1.0+3.4
FH to their forehand · return +1+3.0±3.8+0.4+2.6
FH to their backhand · return+2.6±3.8+0.8+1.8
BH to their backhand · return+2.5±2.8+0.9+1.7

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · serve +1−5.0±3.1−2.1−2.9
BH to the middle · return +1−2.9±2.4−0.6−2.3
FH to their forehand · serve +1−2.6±3.2−0.2−2.4
BH to their forehand · rally−2.6±3.9−1.1−1.5
BH to the middle · rally−2.3±1.8−1.5−0.9

Yannick Hanfmann

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return+6.8±4.2+4.1+2.7
FH to the middle · return+3.2±2.1−0.4+3.6
BH to the middle · return+2.5±1.9+1.0+1.5
FH to their backhand · rally+1.8±2.5±0.0+1.8
BH to their backhand · return+1.4±2.5−0.5+1.8
FH to their forehand · serve +1+0.5±3.1−0.7+1.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · serve +1−5.1±3.0−5.6+0.5
FH to their forehand · rally−3.0±2.5−4.0+1.0
BH to their backhand · return +1−2.5±3.1−3.6+1.1
FH to their forehand · return +1−2.1±3.8−0.7−1.4
BH to their backhand · rally−1.9±2.0−2.2+0.2

Against Yannick Hanfmann-like opponents

Dusan Lajovic vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–59.0%32.6%
Players most similar to Yannick Hanfmann7 53.0%29.6%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Ben Shelton, Arthur Rinderknech, Carlos Alcaraz, Fabian Marozsan, Alejandro Tabilo, Nuno Borges, Zizou Bergs, Gabriel Diallo, Nick Kyrgios, Marco Cecchinato. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.