RallyIQ

Game plan

Fabian Marozsan v Christopher Eubanks

Every number combines what Fabian Marozsan does well with what Christopher Eubanks allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Fabian Marozsan wins, best of 3 70%90%: 43%–89% · best of 5: 74%
Serve points won 70.8% / 66.4% Fabian / Christopher · tour 65.7%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 70%serve 70.8% / 66.4%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Fabian Marozsan's record against Christopher Eubanks's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads. A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerFabianChristopher
Direction choice+0.17 ±0.08
better than 91%
−0.07 ±0.14
better than 40%
Shot selection+0.04 ±0.26
better than 58%
−0.33 ±0.35
better than 20%
Execution+0.87 ±0.78
better than 93%
−2.55 ±0.87
better than 0%
Points left on the table2.29 ±0.13
lower than 85%
3.10 ±0.25
lower than 16%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Fabian Marozsan +0.24, Christopher Eubanks −1.32. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Fabian Marozsan serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowFabian winsv ChristopherMatchupOptimal
Wide47%69%79%76.0%±6.043% ▼
Body10%69%61%66.7%±11.60% ▼
T44%69%85%81.2%±5.657% ▲

Optimal v Christopher Eubanks: +0.8±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +3.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowFabian winsv ChristopherMatchupOptimal
Wide50%71%81%79.8%±5.563% ▲
Body11%69%52%57.9%±14.20% ▼
T38%64%80%73.4%±6.937% ▼

Optimal v Christopher Eubanks: +1.2±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +4.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Christopher Eubanks serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowChristopher winsv FabianMatchupOptimal
Wide47%68%72%66.6%±6.741% ▼
Body7%70%61%67.9%±12.60% ▼
T46%66%79%70.3%±6.659% ▲

Optimal v Fabian Marozsan: +0.5±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowChristopher winsv FabianMatchupOptimal
Wide61%75%72%74.3%±6.151% ▼
Body2%61%64%62.4%±15.90% ▼
T36%74%71%73.0%±6.749% ▲

Optimal v Fabian Marozsan: +0.5±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +0.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Fabian Marozsan returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ChristopherValue
FH through the middle39%+4.3+1.4+1.4+7.1±2.7
FH crosscourt19%+5.5+4.6+1.0+11.0±4.4
FH slice through the middle16%−4.2+0.1+1.1−3.0±2.3
FH down the line14%+1.7+4.8−2.6+4.0±4.5
FH slice down the line8%−4.3+1.0−0.1−3.4±3.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +6.5±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (360 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ChristopherValue
BH through the middle40%+6.4+2.1+2.5+11.1±2.5
BH crosscourt30%+8.8+2.5+0.6+11.8±3.5
BH slice through the middle11%−4.2+0.2−0.7−4.7±2.5
BH down the line11%+4.2−1.2−0.8+2.3±4.5
BH slice crosscourt6%+0.5−0.9−1.4−1.8±2.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.6±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (317 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ChristopherValue
FH through the middle44%−3.5+0.6−1.7−4.5±2.9
FH down the line26%−1.8−0.4−1.7−3.9±4.6
FH crosscourt24%−0.2+1.6±0.0+1.4±4.0
FH slice through the middle6%−12.7−0.1+0.1−12.6±1.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.8±3.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (104 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ChristopherValue
BH through the middle47%−2.9+2.4−1.1−1.6±2.4
BH crosscourt40%+1.0+1.7−1.6+1.1±3.1
BH down the line13%−0.2+1.8+1.2+2.9±4.7

Lean BH down the line: +2.8±4.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (229 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Christopher Eubanks returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FabianValue
FH through the middle41%+4.3−2.3+3.4+5.4±2.7
FH down the line22%+1.7−4.4+2.9+0.1±4.5
FH crosscourt15%+5.5−3.7+7.1+8.9±4.4
FH slice through the middle12%−4.2−2.7−0.6−7.5±2.3
FH slice crosscourt7%−4.3+0.6+0.5−3.2±2.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +6.5±4.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (276 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FabianValue
BH slice through the middle49%−4.2+0.1+0.3−3.8±2.4
BH slice crosscourt28%+0.5−2.3+1.7−0.1±2.9
BH slice down the line9%−8.4−1.1−0.1−9.6±3.0
BH through the middle6%+6.4−1.3+3.5+8.6±2.5
BH crosscourt5%+8.8−1.0+4.9+12.7±3.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +14.1±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (295 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FabianValue
FH through the middle46%−3.5−2.8+1.0−5.2±2.8
FH crosscourt36%−0.2−3.4+0.9−2.8±4.3
FH down the line19%−1.8+0.3−0.7−2.2±4.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.0±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (70 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FabianValue
BH through the middle27%−2.9−0.8+1.0−2.6±2.4
BH slice crosscourt22%−4.0−0.4−1.6−6.0±2.1
BH slice through the middle20%−11.3−2.4±0.0−13.7±1.7
BH down the line11%−0.2−1.8+3.7+1.8±4.8
BH crosscourt8%+1.0+1.2+1.2+3.5±2.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +7.8±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (215 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Fabian Marozsan

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return+6.6±5.9+4.7+2.0
BH to the middle · return+3.3±2.8+2.0+1.4
FH to their forehand · serve +1+1.9±4.7+0.8+1.1
FH to the middle · serve +1+1.3±3.4+0.6+0.6
FH to the middle · return+1.2±3.2+1.9−0.6
BH to their backhand · return+1.2±4.0+1.9−0.7

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · serve +1−9.1±4.3+1.4−10.5
FH to their backhand · return−5.1±5.4−0.3−4.8
BH to their backhand · serve +1−3.1±4.1−0.6−2.5
BH to their backhand · rally−2.8±3.5+0.3−3.2
BH to the middle · rally−0.9±2.8−1.6+0.7

Christopher Eubanks

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · serve +1+5.9±4.5+3.3+2.7
FH to their forehand · return +1+2.4±5.5−0.5+2.9
FH to their backhand · serve +1+2.2±4.2−0.2+2.4
FH to their forehand · return+2.0±5.8−3.9+5.9
FH to the middle · rally−0.5±3.2−2.1+1.7
BH to the middle · return−1.6±3.0−4.1+2.5

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return +1−11.1±5.5−11.5+0.4
BH to their backhand · serve +1−6.9±4.3−8.0+1.1
BH to their backhand · rally−6.8±3.6−6.6−0.3
FH to the middle · serve +1−6.6±3.5−6.0−0.6
FH to their backhand · return−5.8±5.3−7.7+1.9

Against Christopher Eubanks-like opponents

Fabian Marozsan vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–61.6%34.5%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Matteo Berrettini, Tallon Griekspoor, Denis Shapovalov, Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard, Reilly Opelka, Gabriel Diallo, Nicolas Jarry, Milos Raonic, Tim Van Rijthoven, Vasek Pospisil. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.