RallyIQ

Game plan

Gregoire Barrere v Stan Wawrinka

Every number combines what Gregoire Barrere does well with what Stan Wawrinka allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Gregoire Barrere wins, best of 3 13%90%: 4%–33% · best of 5: 8%
Serve points won 58.4% / 67.3% Gregoire / Stan · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 13%serve 58.4% / 67.3%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Gregoire Barrere's record against Stan Wawrinka's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads. A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerGregoireStan
Direction choice−0.05 ±0.14
better than 44%
+0.15 ±0.05
better than 88%
Shot selection−0.39 ±0.18
better than 17%
−0.72 ±0.08
better than 5%
Execution−1.15 ±0.70
better than 21%
−0.11 ±0.23
better than 63%
Points left on the table2.65 ±0.31
lower than 44%
2.40 ±0.08
lower than 74%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Gregoire Barrere serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowGregoire winsv StanMatchupOptimal
Wide50%68%73%68.7%±5.863% ▲
Body9%55%66%57.7%±10.90% ▼
T41%64%75%64.4%±6.837% ▼

Optimal v Stan Wawrinka: +0.3±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowGregoire winsv StanMatchupOptimal
Wide51%70%74%71.2%±6.264% ▲
Body8%63%66%65.3%±11.38%
T41%62%73%63.3%±7.128% ▼

Optimal v Stan Wawrinka: +0.3±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Stan Wawrinka serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowStan winsv GregoireMatchupOptimal
Wide45%72%75%73.8%±6.041% ▼
Body9%63%66%66.0%±11.60% ▼
T46%77%77%78.6%±5.459% ▲

Optimal v Gregoire Barrere: +0.5±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +3.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowStan winsv GregoireMatchupOptimal
Wide52%73%81%80.9%±5.465% ▲
Body4%63%66%65.4%±12.60% ▼
T44%73%72%72.7%±6.535% ▼

Optimal v Gregoire Barrere: +0.5±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +4.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Gregoire Barrere returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv StanValue
FH through the middle41%+4.3+2.5−1.1+5.6±2.3
FH down the line20%+1.7+1.5−0.8+2.4±3.7
FH slice through the middle20%−4.2+0.2±0.0−3.9±2.0
FH crosscourt13%+5.5−1.3−1.0+3.2±3.4
FH slice down the line6%−4.3+0.8−0.3−3.8±2.7

Lean FH through the middle: +3.4±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (159 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv StanValue
BH through the middle39%+6.4+3.5+0.2+10.1±2.2
BH slice through the middle21%−4.2−2.7+0.7−6.2±2.0
BH crosscourt19%+8.8+1.0+1.0+10.8±2.8
BH slice crosscourt9%+0.5−1.0+1.0+0.5±2.3
BH down the line7%+4.2+0.1+0.2+4.5±3.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +6.0±2.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (150 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv StanValue
FH through the middle47%−3.5−1.3−1.3−6.1±2.3
FH down the line41%−1.8−0.8−3.9−6.5±3.9
FH crosscourt12%−0.2+0.4−1.0−0.8±3.1

Lean FH through the middle: −0.5±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (68 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv StanValue
BH through the middle49%−2.9+1.4−0.4−1.9±1.9
BH crosscourt40%+1.0−3.3−0.2−2.5±2.5
BH down the line11%−0.2+1.0−1.0−0.2±3.3

Lean BH through the middle: +0.1±1.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (85 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Stan Wawrinka returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GregoireValue
FH through the middle30%+4.3−2.6+0.6+2.3±2.3
FH slice through the middle27%−4.2+0.7+0.7−2.8±1.8
FH crosscourt15%+5.5−0.1+2.6+8.0±3.7
FH slice crosscourt13%−4.3+2.3±0.0−2.1±1.4
FH down the line8%+1.7−2.6+0.9±0.0±4.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +7.4±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (2553 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GregoireValue
BH slice through the middle40%−4.2±0.0−0.1−4.3±1.9
BH slice crosscourt30%+0.5+1.5−1.2+0.9±2.1
BH through the middle12%+6.4−3.1+3.8+7.1±2.4
BH crosscourt8%+8.8−0.5+0.3+8.6±3.2
BH slice down the line6%−8.4+0.4−1.7−9.7±2.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +9.0±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (2669 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GregoireValue
FH through the middle45%−3.5−1.3−1.4−6.2±2.5
FH crosscourt33%−0.2−1.8+1.1−0.9±3.9
FH down the line10%−1.8−0.5+0.2−2.1±4.6
FH slice through the middle6%−12.7+0.5±0.0−12.1±1.7
FH slice crosscourt2%−12.5−0.3±0.0−12.8±1.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.6±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (745 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GregoireValue
BH crosscourt31%+1.0+0.4+0.3+1.8±2.6
BH through the middle28%−2.9+0.7+1.7−0.5±2.0
BH slice crosscourt16%−4.0−4.1±0.0−8.2±1.3
BH slice through the middle9%−11.3−1.7±0.0−13.0±1.4
BH down the line7%−0.2−2.1−0.2−2.6±4.6
FH inside-in4%+0.6+2.6+1.1+4.3±4.3

Lean FH inside-in: +6.7±4.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (1996 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Gregoire Barrere

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return+1.0±1.8+2.3−1.3
BH to their backhand · return +1+0.9±2.7+1.7−0.8
BH to their backhand · serve +1+0.8±2.5+2.5−1.7
FH to the middle · return+0.2±2.1+1.3−1.1
FH to the middle · serve +1−0.5±2.1+1.1−1.6
FH to the middle · rally−0.6±1.8+0.3−0.9

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · rally−5.9±3.4−3.8−2.1
FH to their backhand · serve +1−5.2±2.7−2.5−2.8
FH to their forehand · serve +1−4.2±2.9−0.9−3.3
BH to the middle · serve +1−4.1±2.2−2.0−2.1
FH to their backhand · return−2.4±3.3−0.1−2.2

Stan Wawrinka

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · rally+2.6±2.4−0.7+3.3
FH to their forehand · return+2.4±3.6−0.2+2.5
BH to their backhand · serve +1+2.4±2.6+0.2+2.2
FH to their forehand · rally+2.1±2.3−0.2+2.3
FH to the middle · return +1+1.6±2.2+1.4+0.3
BH to the middle · rally+0.5±1.6−1.0+1.5

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · return−3.0±1.9−2.5−0.5
BH slice to their backhand · rally−2.9±2.0−0.9−2.0
BH to their forehand · rally−2.4±3.4−2.1−0.3
BH to their backhand · return−2.2±2.6−2.7+0.5
FH to the middle · rally−1.9±1.8−0.6−1.3

Against Stan Wawrinka-like opponents

Gregoire Barrere vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–57.1%33.4%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Grigor Dimitrov, Christopher Oconnell, Benjamin Bonzi, Fabio Fognini, Richard Gasquet, Jo Wilfried Tsonga, Roger Federer, Tommy Haas, Ivan Ljubicic. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.