RallyIQ

Game plan

Hubert Hurkacz v Fabian Marozsan

Every number combines what Hubert Hurkacz does well with what Fabian Marozsan allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Hubert Hurkacz wins, best of 3 80%90%: 57%–93% · best of 5: 85%
Serve points won 70.8% / 63.8% Hubert / Fabian · tour 63.5%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 75%serve 69.8% / 64.3%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. Both were charted enough in the last three seasons, so those carry the most weight. The result is then nudged by Hubert Hurkacz's record against Fabian Marozsan's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +1.5 on serve, −0.8 on return vs expectation (2511 points); head-to-head: +4.3 on serve, +10.4 on return vs expectation (259 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerHubertFabian
Direction choice+0.09 ±0.02
better than 79%
+0.17 ±0.08
better than 91%
Shot selection+0.14 ±0.05
better than 68%
+0.04 ±0.26
better than 58%
Execution−0.38 ±0.15
better than 49%
+0.87 ±0.78
better than 93%
Points left on the table2.49 ±0.04
lower than 62%
2.29 ±0.13
lower than 85%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Hubert Hurkacz +0.64, Fabian Marozsan −0.03. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Hubert Hurkacz serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowHubert winsv FabianMatchupOptimal
Wide47%78%72%76.9%±3.939% ▼
Body5%63%61%61.0%±9.80% ▼
T48%80%79%83.1%±3.461% ▲

Optimal v Fabian Marozsan: +0.8±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +4.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowHubert winsv FabianMatchupOptimal
Wide53%78%72%78.0%±4.144% ▼
Body4%66%64%67.0%±10.50% ▼
T42%76%71%75.0%±4.456% ▲

Optimal v Fabian Marozsan: +0.3±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Fabian Marozsan serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowFabian winsv HubertMatchupOptimal
Wide47%69%73%69.2%±4.543% ▼
Body10%69%63%69.1%±7.90% ▼
T44%69%77%71.5%±4.657% ▲

Optimal v Hubert Hurkacz: +0.5±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowFabian winsv HubertMatchupOptimal
Wide50%71%73%71.1%±4.563% ▲
Body11%69%64%69.9%±7.80% ▼
T38%64%73%65.3%±5.237% ▼

Optimal v Hubert Hurkacz: +0.2±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Hubert Hurkacz returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FabianValue
FH through the middle44%+4.3−0.4+3.4+7.2±1.9
FH crosscourt24%+5.5−2.3+7.1+10.2±3.2
FH down the line21%+1.7−2.0+2.9+2.6±3.4
FH slice through the middle5%−4.2−2.1−0.6−6.9±2.0
FH slice crosscourt5%−4.3−4.4+0.5−8.2±1.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.1±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (6555 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FabianValue
BH through the middle34%+6.4−0.2+3.5+9.7±1.8
BH crosscourt26%+8.8−0.1+4.9+13.6±2.4
BH slice through the middle14%−4.2−3.5+0.3−7.3±2.0
BH down the line10%+4.2−0.9+3.4+6.7±3.7
BH slice crosscourt10%+0.5−6.1+1.7−3.9±2.3

Lean BH crosscourt: +8.7±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (6287 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FabianValue
FH through the middle44%−3.5+1.4+1.0−1.1±2.2
FH down the line26%−1.8−1.5−0.7−4.0±3.9
FH crosscourt26%−0.2−3.3+0.9−2.7±3.7
FH slice through the middle2%−12.7−3.7±0.0−16.3±1.7
FH slice crosscourt1%−12.5−3.9±0.0−16.4±2.0

Lean FH through the middle: +1.7±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (1676 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FabianValue
BH crosscourt42%+1.0−1.1+1.2+1.2±2.2
BH through the middle37%−2.9±0.0+1.0−1.9±1.7
BH down the line14%−0.2+0.5+3.7+4.0±4.0
FH through the middle2%−2.9−1.7+1.0−3.5±2.4
BH slice through the middle1%−11.3−1.4±0.0−12.7±1.7

Lean BH down the line: +4.0±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (3803 returns charted)

Fabian Marozsan returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv HubertValue
FH through the middle39%+4.3+1.4−2.1+3.5±2.0
FH crosscourt19%+5.5+4.6−6.6+3.5±3.4
FH slice through the middle16%−4.2+0.1−2.8−6.9±1.8
FH down the line14%+1.7+4.8−6.7−0.2±3.5
FH slice down the line8%−4.3+1.0−7.6−10.9±2.6

Lean FH through the middle: +3.8±1.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (360 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv HubertValue
BH through the middle40%+6.4+2.1−1.0+7.6±1.9
BH crosscourt30%+8.8+2.5−2.7+8.5±2.6
BH slice through the middle11%−4.2+0.2−4.9−8.9±1.9
BH down the line11%+4.2−1.2−5.6−2.6±3.6
BH slice crosscourt6%+0.5−0.9−6.9−7.3±2.2

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.2±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (317 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv HubertValue
FH through the middle44%−3.5+0.6−1.0−3.9±2.2
FH down the line26%−1.8−0.4−4.1−6.3±3.6
FH crosscourt24%−0.2+1.6−2.9−1.6±3.4
FH slice through the middle6%−12.7−0.1−3.7−16.4±1.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.1±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (104 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv HubertValue
BH through the middle47%−2.9+2.4−0.7−1.2±1.8
BH crosscourt40%+1.0+1.7−1.8+1.0±2.3
BH down the line13%−0.2+1.8−5.0−3.4±3.8

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.6±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (229 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Hubert Hurkacz

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return+3.9±3.4−0.9+4.8
FH to their forehand · return+3.8±3.1−2.0+5.9
FH to the middle · return+3.5±1.6+0.3+3.1
BH to their backhand · return+3.2±1.8−0.6+3.8
FH to their forehand · return +1+2.9±2.9±0.0+2.9
BH to the middle · return+2.5±1.4±0.0+2.5

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · serve +1−4.0±2.0−2.0−2.1
BH slice to their backhand · rally−2.9±1.8−1.7−1.2
FH to their backhand · return +1−1.6±2.9−1.9+0.4
BH slice to the middle · rally−1.3±1.8−0.4−1.0
BH slice to their backhand · return +1−1.1±2.1−0.6−0.5

Fabian Marozsan

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return +1+2.8±3.0+2.7±0.0
FH to their backhand · serve +1+2.3±2.2+1.4+0.9
BH to their forehand · rally+2.1±3.1+1.0+1.1
FH to the middle · serve +1+1.9±2.0+0.6+1.2
BH to the middle · serve +1+1.8±2.0+0.3+1.5
FH to their forehand · serve +1+1.5±2.2+0.8+0.7

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return−6.1±3.0−0.3−5.8
BH to their forehand · return−5.2±3.4+0.3−5.5
BH slice to their backhand · rally−4.8±1.8−3.9−0.9
FH slice to the middle · return−3.2±1.8−0.2−3.0
BH to the middle · return +1−1.9±1.9−2.6+0.8

Against Fabian Marozsan-like opponents

Hubert Hurkacz vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–68.3%34.4%
Players most similar to Fabian Marozsan13 68.1%33.4%
Fabian Marozsan (charted head-to-head)2 72.6%45.8%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Joao Fonseca, Carlos Alcaraz, Sebastian Korda, Zizou Bergs, Laslo Djere, Francisco Cerundolo, Roman Safiullin, Fabio Fognini, Kei Nishikori. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head