RallyIQ

Game plan

Jack Draper v Yoshihito Nishioka

Every number combines what Jack Draper does well with what Yoshihito Nishioka allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Jack Draper wins, best of 3 92%90%: 77%–98% · best of 5: 96%
Serve points won 67.5% / 56.2% Jack / Yoshihito · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 93%serve 67.6% / 56.2%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Jack Draper's record against Yoshihito Nishioka's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −1.5 on serve, −0.4 on return vs expectation (234 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerJackYoshihito
Direction choice+0.10 ±0.07
better than 81%
−0.29 ±0.10
better than 6%
Shot selection+0.26 ±0.13
better than 77%
−0.18 ±0.14
better than 32%
Execution+1.21 ±0.65
better than 98%
+0.62 ±0.43
better than 87%
Points left on the table2.75 ±0.11
lower than 35%
3.00 ±0.19
lower than 19%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Jack Draper +2.29, Yoshihito Nishioka +1.60. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Jack Draper serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowJack winsv YoshihitoMatchupOptimal
Wide41%71%79%77.9%±4.754% ▲
Body5%60%55%51.2%±12.60% ▼
T54%73%80%78.0%±4.646% ▼

Optimal v Yoshihito Nishioka: +0.5±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowJack winsv YoshihitoMatchupOptimal
Wide51%76%78%81.3%±4.344% ▼
Body6%65%62%64.0%±12.30% ▼
T43%73%77%77.6%±5.056% ▲

Optimal v Yoshihito Nishioka: +0.5±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Yoshihito Nishioka serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowYoshihito winsv JackMatchupOptimal
Wide25%62%72%61.1%±6.838% ▲
Body22%57%62%55.4%±10.89% ▼
T53%61%71%57.0%±5.953%

Optimal v Jack Draper: +0.3±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowYoshihito winsv JackMatchupOptimal
Wide55%63%75%65.3%±5.542% ▼
Body16%60%66%63.5%±10.616%
T29%75%71%73.9%±6.042% ▲

Optimal v Jack Draper: +0.3±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +6.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Jack Draper returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YoshihitoValue
FH through the middle51%+4.3+0.3+3.3+7.9±2.3
FH crosscourt27%+5.5+0.1−2.0+3.6±4.3
FH down the line14%+1.7−1.2+2.1+2.5±4.3
FH slice through the middle6%−4.2+0.9+1.2−2.1±2.3
FH slice crosscourt2%−4.3+1.5+1.3−1.5±2.1

Lean FH through the middle: +2.8±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (427 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YoshihitoValue
BH through the middle46%+6.4+1.0+4.2+11.7±1.8
BH crosscourt28%+8.8−1.6+0.8+8.0±3.1
BH down the line12%+4.2+2.7+5.0+12.0±4.1
BH slice through the middle8%−4.2−1.0+0.9−4.2±2.4
BH slice down the line3%−8.4+0.6+3.2−4.6±3.3

Lean BH down the line: +3.4±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (581 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YoshihitoValue
FH through the middle46%−3.5−0.7+2.8−1.4±2.6
FH crosscourt31%−0.2−0.3−4.7−5.2±4.4
FH down the line18%−1.8+3.0+5.0+6.2±4.5
FH slice through the middle4%−12.7−2.1−0.1−14.8±1.6

Lean FH down the line: +8.0±4.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (179 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YoshihitoValue
BH through the middle45%−2.9+2.0+0.2−0.7±2.0
BH crosscourt27%+1.0−1.7+4.3+3.6±3.1
FH through the middle9%−2.9+1.5+2.8+1.4±2.2
BH down the line8%−0.2+0.3+0.8+0.9±4.4
FH inside-in6%+0.6−0.3−4.7−4.4±4.3

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.7±2.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (412 returns charted)

Yoshihito Nishioka returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JackValue
FH through the middle40%+4.3+3.3+2.1+9.7±2.6
FH crosscourt23%+5.5+0.7+0.9+7.1±4.3
FH slice through the middle17%−4.2+2.3±0.0−1.9±2.3
FH down the line9%+1.7−0.1+2.4+4.0±4.4
FH slice crosscourt7%−4.3+3.3+0.6−0.4±2.7

Lean FH through the middle: +4.3±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (435 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JackValue
BH through the middle38%+6.4+0.5+1.9+8.7±2.2
BH crosscourt22%+8.8±0.0−0.2+8.6±3.4
BH slice through the middle21%−4.2−0.6−0.8−5.5±2.3
BH slice down the line7%−8.4+1.7+1.8−4.9±3.4
BH down the line6%+4.2−4.8+1.2+0.6±4.4

Lean BH through the middle: +5.2±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (612 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JackValue
FH through the middle49%−3.5+1.5−1.0−2.9±2.6
FH crosscourt38%−0.2+0.3+1.0+1.1±4.3
FH down the line9%−1.8−1.0+1.5−1.3±4.4
FH slice through the middle4%−12.7+0.5+0.7−11.5±1.8

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.7±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (261 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JackValue
BH through the middle53%−2.9+2.9+0.6+0.6±2.1
BH crosscourt29%+1.0+2.5−3.4+0.1±3.2
BH down the line9%−0.2+0.7−2.7−2.2±4.4
BH slice through the middle4%−11.3−0.5±0.0−11.8±1.4
FH through the middle3%−2.9+1.8−1.0−2.1±1.9

Lean BH through the middle: +1.1±1.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (286 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Jack Draper

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return+7.1±1.5+2.3+4.8
BH to their backhand · return+5.9±2.9+2.2+3.7
FH to their backhand · return +1+5.6±3.0+4.2+1.4
FH to their backhand · return+5.1±3.2+1.3+3.9
BH to their forehand · return +1+5.1±3.9+2.3+2.8
BH to their forehand · rally+5.0±2.1+3.0+2.0

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return−5.0±4.2−0.2−4.8
BH to their backhand · return +1−2.7±3.2+0.9−3.6
FH to their forehand · return +1−2.0±3.5−1.8−0.2
FH to the middle · serve +1−1.5±2.4±0.0−1.4
BH to their backhand · rally−1.1±2.0+0.6−1.6

Yoshihito Nishioka

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · serve +1+4.6±3.8+2.4+2.1
FH to their backhand · return+4.3±3.2+2.3+2.0
BH to their forehand · return +1+4.0±4.3+2.7+1.3
FH to the middle · rally+3.8±1.6+2.9+0.9
FH to their backhand · rally+3.4±1.5+1.6+1.9
FH to their forehand · rally+2.8±2.0+1.5+1.3

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · return−4.4±3.2−2.9−1.5
BH slice to their backhand · rally−4.2±2.6−3.0−1.2
BH to their backhand · serve +1−4.1±3.1±0.0−4.1
BH slice to the middle · rally−1.7±2.2−1.6−0.1
FH to the middle · return +1−1.6±2.5+0.6−2.2

Against Yoshihito Nishioka-like opponents

Jack Draper vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–64.6%37.1%
Players most similar to Yoshihito Nishioka1 60.0%34.5%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Cameron Norrie, Gael Monfils, Mattia Bellucci, Albert Ramos, Dominik Koepfer, Rafael Nadal, Federico Delbonis, Pablo Cuevas, Guido Pella, Gaston Gaudio. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.