RallyIQ

Game plan

Jannik Sinner v Cristian Garin

Every number combines what Jannik Sinner does well with what Cristian Garin allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Jannik Sinner wins, best of 3 94%90%: 81%–98% · best of 5: 97%
Serve points won 67.5% / 55.6% Jannik / Cristian · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 93%serve 66.8% / 55.5%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Jannik Sinner's record against Cristian Garin's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +0.8 on serve, −0.3 on return vs expectation (1405 points); head-to-head: +16.9 on serve, +0.6 on return vs expectation (94 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerJannikCristian
Direction choice−0.07 ±0.02
better than 40%
−0.02 ±0.12
better than 51%
Shot selection+0.50 ±0.04
better than 93%
+0.48 ±0.19
better than 90%
Execution+0.25 ±0.16
better than 78%
−0.81 ±0.50
better than 32%
Points left on the table2.38 ±0.04
lower than 75%
2.40 ±0.21
lower than 73%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Jannik Sinner +1.12, Cristian Garin −1.22. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Jannik Sinner serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowJannik winsv CristianMatchupOptimal
Wide46%78%70%75.2%±3.859% ▲
Body11%67%64%67.7%±8.50% ▼
T43%78%74%77.2%±3.641% ▼

Optimal v Cristian Garin: +0.6±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowJannik winsv CristianMatchupOptimal
Wide58%76%74%77.8%±3.652% ▼
Body7%68%61%66.0%±9.50% ▼
T35%76%71%75.1%±4.448% ▲

Optimal v Cristian Garin: +0.4±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Cristian Garin serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowCristian winsv JannikMatchupOptimal
Wide37%66%68%60.4%±5.034% ▼
Body11%56%58%50.3%±8.40% ▼
T53%75%72%72.8%±4.366% ▲

Optimal v Jannik Sinner: +0.7±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +6.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowCristian winsv JannikMatchupOptimal
Wide62%65%69%61.7%±4.349% ▼
Body9%62%59%58.8%±8.922% ▲
T29%69%66%63.1%±5.729%

Optimal v Jannik Sinner: +0.3±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Jannik Sinner returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CristianValue
FH through the middle57%+4.3+1.3+0.3+5.9±1.8
FH crosscourt23%+5.5+0.2+4.1+9.9±3.4
FH down the line16%+1.7−0.1−1.1+0.5±3.5
FH slice through the middle2%−4.2−4.2+0.7−7.7±2.3
FH slice crosscourt1%−4.3−1.8+1.3−4.9±2.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.3±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (5521 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CristianValue
BH through the middle44%+6.4+0.1+2.6+9.1±1.5
BH crosscourt29%+8.8−0.6+1.5+9.7±2.4
BH down the line10%+4.2+0.3+0.6+5.1±3.7
BH slice through the middle9%−4.2−6.9+1.3−9.9±2.0
BH slice crosscourt5%+0.5−7.2−1.3−7.9±2.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.1±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (5508 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CristianValue
FH through the middle58%−3.5+0.5+1.0−2.0±1.9
FH crosscourt24%−0.2+0.5−0.1+0.2±3.7
FH down the line18%−1.8−1.3+3.5+0.5±4.1
BH through the middle0%+0.1+0.6+1.1+1.8±1.5

Lean FH down the line: +1.4±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (1459 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CristianValue
BH through the middle45%−2.9+0.6+1.1−1.2±1.6
BH crosscourt43%+1.0−0.4+1.2+1.8±2.5
BH down the line7%−0.2+1.3−4.1−3.0±4.5
FH through the middle3%−2.9±0.0+1.0−1.8±2.1
FH inside-in1%+0.6+0.2−0.1+0.6±4.3
FH inside-out1%+1.0+1.0+3.5+5.4±3.6

Lean FH inside-out: +5.5±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (3318 returns charted)

Cristian Garin returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JannikValue
FH through the middle54%+4.3+0.7−1.6+3.3±1.8
FH crosscourt27%+5.5−0.2−1.6+3.8±3.2
FH down the line13%+1.7−2.1−4.4−4.8±3.6
FH slice through the middle4%−4.2+0.1−1.1−5.2±1.7
FH slice crosscourt2%−4.3−0.2−2.5−7.0±2.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.9±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (416 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JannikValue
BH through the middle54%+6.4+1.5−0.8+7.1±1.6
BH crosscourt28%+8.8−1.6−1.2+6.0±2.4
BH down the line10%+4.2−3.0−2.8−1.5±3.7
BH slice through the middle7%−4.2+0.4−3.3−7.1±1.9
BH slice crosscourt1%+0.5−1.3−4.0−4.8±1.9

Lean BH through the middle: +2.3±1.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (486 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JannikValue
FH through the middle54%−3.5+1.2−1.0−3.3±2.2
FH crosscourt33%−0.2−0.9−1.6−2.7±3.4
FH down the line14%−1.8+2.0−3.0−2.9±3.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +0.3±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (95 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JannikValue
BH through the middle43%−2.9+0.3−0.5−3.1±1.6
BH crosscourt36%+1.0+1.2−2.0+0.2±2.1
BH down the line8%−0.2+3.1−1.3+1.6±4.1
FH through the middle8%−2.9+0.7−1.0−3.1±1.8
FH inside-out3%+1.0−2.0−3.0−4.0±2.5

Lean BH down the line: +3.1±3.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (446 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Jannik Sinner

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return+3.5±1.2+0.7+2.8
FH to their forehand · return+3.2±3.1+1.5+1.7
FH to their backhand · serve +1+3.0±2.0+1.8+1.3
BH to the middle · return +1+2.9±1.6+1.1+1.9
FH to their forehand · serve +1+2.8±2.4+1.2+1.6
BH to their forehand · rally+2.8±2.4+1.8+0.9

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to the middle · return−4.2±2.0−6.0+1.8
BH slice to their forehand · rally−2.9±3.1−3.8+0.9
BH slice to their backhand · rally−2.4±1.8−1.8−0.6
BH slice to their backhand · return +1−2.2±2.4−2.4+0.2
FH to their backhand · return +1−1.5±2.7−0.8−0.8

Cristian Garin

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · return +1+1.7±2.0+0.9+0.9
BH to the middle · return +1+1.4±1.8+1.5−0.1
FH to the middle · rally+0.7±1.2+1.0−0.3
FH to their forehand · return +1+0.7±2.8+0.8−0.1
BH to their backhand · rally+0.4±1.1+0.4±0.0
BH to the middle · return+0.3±1.2+1.1−0.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return +1−6.9±3.9−2.9−4.0
FH to their backhand · return−5.7±2.9−1.6−4.0
BH slice to their backhand · rally−5.2±1.9−4.7−0.5
BH to their forehand · serve +1−4.6±3.7−2.5−2.1
BH to their forehand · rally−3.7±2.6−0.8−2.9

Against Cristian Garin-like opponents

Jannik Sinner vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–68.1%40.7%
Players most similar to Cristian Garin9 68.9%41.6%
Cristian Garin (charted head-to-head)1 83.7%45.1%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Cameron Norrie, Gael Monfils, Juncheng Shang, Thiago Monteiro, Daniel Elahi Galan, Federico Delbonis, Egor Gerasimov, Pablo Cuevas, Philipp Kohlschreiber. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head