RallyIQ

Game plan

Kaja Juvan v Marketa Vondrousova

Every number combines what Kaja Juvan does well with what Marketa Vondrousova allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Kaja Juvan wins, best of 3 35%90%: 11%–69% · best of 5: 32%
Serve points won 55.4% / 58.2% Kaja / Marketa · tour 55.0%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 35%serve 55.4% / 58.2%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Kaja Juvan's record against Marketa Vondrousova's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads. A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerKajaMarketa
Direction choice−0.08 ±0.13
better than 40%
−0.04 ±0.07
better than 47%
Shot selection−0.23 ±0.22
better than 26%
−0.68 ±0.17
better than 7%
Execution−0.59 ±0.61
better than 30%
+0.63 ±0.43
better than 83%
Points left on the table2.80 ±0.19
lower than 24%
2.99 ±0.12
lower than 11%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Kaja Juvan −0.99, Marketa Vondrousova +0.69. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Kaja Juvan serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowKaja winsv MarketaMatchupOptimal
Wide30%64%61%58.7%±7.638% ▲
Body21%62%59%63.2%±8.328% ▲
T49%66%65%63.4%±6.934% ▼

Optimal v Marketa Vondrousova: +0.2±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowKaja winsv MarketaMatchupOptimal
Wide55%68%64%66.3%±6.970% ▲
Body18%62%56%62.4%±9.13% ▼
T26%59%63%57.1%±8.427%

Optimal v Marketa Vondrousova: +0.3±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Marketa Vondrousova serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMarketa winsv KajaMatchupOptimal
Wide22%68%73%75.0%±7.337% ▲
Body21%61%51%54.0%±8.66% ▼
T57%63%69%63.5%±6.757%

Optimal v Kaja Juvan: +1.2±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +10.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMarketa winsv KajaMatchupOptimal
Wide51%65%72%72.2%±6.166% ▲
Body17%58%57%59.4%±8.92% ▼
T32%69%67%70.8%±7.532%

Optimal v Kaja Juvan: +0.8±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Kaja Juvan returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarketaValue
FH through the middle43%+4.2+0.2−2.2+2.2±2.7
FH slice through the middle21%−6.7+1.3+1.0−4.4±2.6
FH crosscourt14%+5.3−4.5+1.9+2.7±4.3
FH down the line9%+1.5−0.1−5.7−4.3±4.4
FH slice crosscourt8%−6.6−0.5+0.8−6.3±2.6

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.8±4.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (235 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarketaValue
BH through the middle59%+6.0+1.5+1.3+8.8±2.1
BH crosscourt20%+7.7−0.2−1.7+5.8±3.4
BH down the line12%+2.2−0.4−2.5−0.8±4.2
BH slice through the middle5%−6.2+0.7+1.1−4.5±2.3
BH slice crosscourt4%−4.2−1.7+1.2−4.7±2.7

Lean BH through the middle: +2.9±1.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (294 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarketaValue
FH crosscourt44%+0.5+0.1−1.0−0.4±4.4
FH through the middle40%−3.2+0.5+1.6−1.1±2.8
FH down the line16%−0.6−2.0−5.3−7.9±4.6

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.5±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (63 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarketaValue
BH through the middle53%−2.6−1.3−0.2−4.1±2.4
BH crosscourt26%+1.5−4.6+1.6−1.6±3.3
BH down the line12%−0.5+0.3+0.9+0.7±4.8
FH inside-out6%+1.4−0.4−5.3−4.3±3.7
FH through the middle4%−2.7+0.3+1.6−0.8±2.0

Lean BH down the line: +3.5±4.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (137 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Marketa Vondrousova returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KajaValue
FH slice through the middle52%−6.7+2.4−0.9−5.3±2.2
FH slice crosscourt21%−6.6+3.7+0.4−2.5±2.3
FH through the middle10%+4.2−0.9−0.3+3.0±3.0
FH slice down the line8%−10.5−2.1+0.8−11.8±3.0
FH crosscourt5%+5.3−1.3+1.5+5.5±4.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +9.2±4.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (532 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KajaValue
BH through the middle52%+6.0+1.3+1.1+8.4±2.2
BH crosscourt19%+7.7+0.3−3.2+4.8±3.4
BH slice through the middle13%−6.2+0.7−1.6−7.1±2.4
BH down the line11%+2.2+2.0+1.3+5.4±4.5
BH slice down the line3%−12.5+1.2+0.7−10.6±3.1

Lean BH through the middle: +3.9±1.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (740 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KajaValue
FH through the middle41%−3.2−0.7+1.4−2.4±3.0
FH crosscourt35%+0.5+0.6+1.7+2.9±4.5
FH down the line18%−0.6+1.6+0.7+1.7±5.1
FH slice through the middle6%−15.2−1.1±0.0−16.3±1.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.6±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (142 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KajaValue
BH through the middle50%−2.6+2.6+1.1+1.1±2.5
BH crosscourt36%+1.5+0.5−4.3−2.3±3.5
BH down the line13%−0.5−1.8−0.6−2.9±5.1

Lean BH through the middle: +1.8±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (351 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on clay. Each player's clay record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Kaja Juvan

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return+3.3±2.7+2.0+1.3
FH slice to the middle · return+3.1±3.2+1.8+1.4
FH to the middle · rally+3.1±3.2+2.8+0.3
BH to their backhand · return+2.1±4.6+1.7+0.3
BH to the middle · rally+1.8±2.7+0.3+1.5
FH to the middle · serve +1+1.2±3.3+0.4+0.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return−8.9±5.9−3.5−5.4
FH to their backhand · return +1−8.3±5.3−5.5−2.8
BH to their forehand · serve +1−8.0±6.5−4.8−3.1
BH to their backhand · return +1−4.9±4.8−5.2+0.3
BH to their backhand · serve +1−4.4±4.9−0.5−3.9

Marketa Vondrousova

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return+6.8±5.6+2.9+3.9
BH to their backhand · serve +1+6.2±5.1+4.6+1.6
BH to the middle · serve +1+3.7±3.3+2.5+1.2
FH to their backhand · serve +1+3.4±4.6+1.0+2.4
FH to their forehand · return +1+3.0±5.4+2.9+0.1
FH to their forehand · rally+1.6±4.3+2.5−1.0

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · rally−5.0±5.6−0.5−4.5
FH to their forehand · serve +1−4.9±5.3−0.5−4.4
FH to their forehand · return−3.1±6.2−1.8−1.3
FH to the middle · return−2.9±3.5−2.8−0.1
BH to their backhand · return +1−2.8±4.9+1.1−3.9

Against Marketa Vondrousova-like opponents

Kaja Juvan vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–57.7%40.3%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Magdalena Frech, Elina Svitolina, Jil Teichmann, Sara Bejlek, Olga Danilovic, Tiantsoa Sarah Rakotomanga Rajaonah, Bernarda Pera, Ana Bogdan, Kiki Bertens. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.