RallyIQ

Game plan

Karolina Muchova v Ashleigh Barty

Every number combines what Karolina Muchova does well with what Ashleigh Barty allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Karolina Muchova wins, best of 3 31%90%: 13%–57% · best of 5: 27%
Serve points won 59.7% / 63.5% Karolina / Ashleigh · tour 56.3%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 28%serve 59.0% / 63.4%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Karolina Muchova's record against Ashleigh Barty's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +2.6 on serve, −1.1 on return vs expectation (899 points); head-to-head: +2.7 on serve, +4.5 on return vs expectation (154 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerKarolinaAshleigh
Direction choice−0.01 ±0.05
better than 52%
+0.27 ±0.07
better than 93%
Shot selection−0.17 ±0.09
better than 30%
−1.27 ±0.17
better than 2%
Execution+0.22 ±0.28
better than 70%
+0.79 ±0.31
better than 87%
Points left on the table2.88 ±0.08
lower than 18%
2.65 ±0.10
lower than 42%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Karolina Muchova serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowKarolina winsv AshleighMatchupOptimal
Wide40%68%67%69.3%±4.340%
Body22%58%57%57.4%±6.47% ▼
T38%74%62%68.9%±4.553% ▲

Optimal v Ashleigh Barty: +1.4±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +2.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowKarolina winsv AshleighMatchupOptimal
Wide48%68%64%66.4%±4.463% ▲
Body14%57%50%50.1%±7.60% ▼
T39%67%59%62.6%±4.937% ▼

Optimal v Ashleigh Barty: +0.8±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ashleigh Barty serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowAshleigh winsv KarolinaMatchupOptimal
Wide41%73%65%71.8%±4.134% ▼
Body8%64%58%64.4%±7.70% ▼
T51%78%69%78.3%±3.766% ▲

Optimal v Karolina Muchova: +0.6±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +3.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowAshleigh winsv KarolinaMatchupOptimal
Wide44%73%66%73.7%±4.438% ▼
Body9%62%54%59.3%±8.50% ▼
T47%73%64%71.9%±4.362% ▲

Optimal v Karolina Muchova: +1.1±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +2.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Karolina Muchova returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AshleighValue
FH through the middle41%+4.2+1.1−0.3+5.0±2.0
FH slice through the middle18%−6.7+3.0−1.6−5.3±2.2
FH crosscourt15%+5.3−0.7−1.6+3.0±3.7
FH down the line14%+1.5−2.9−2.9−4.2±4.0
FH slice crosscourt9%−6.6+2.2−0.4−4.9±2.7

Lean FH through the middle: +5.0±1.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (1182 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AshleighValue
BH through the middle46%+6.0−0.4+1.8+7.4±1.9
BH crosscourt20%+7.7+0.9+0.2+8.8±3.0
BH slice through the middle14%−6.2+0.2−0.4−6.5±2.3
BH down the line12%+2.2−1.2−2.8−1.8±4.3
BH slice crosscourt5%−4.2−0.8+0.5−4.5±3.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.4±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (1188 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AshleighValue
FH through the middle43%−3.2−1.4−0.1−4.7±2.8
FH crosscourt28%+0.5−0.4−1.3−1.2±4.3
FH down the line21%−0.6−1.9−1.7−4.2±5.1
FH slice through the middle5%−15.2+0.1+0.4−14.7±2.3
FH slice crosscourt3%−14.9+1.3±0.0−13.6±1.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.2±3.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (247 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AshleighValue
BH through the middle40%−2.6+1.0+1.2−0.4±1.9
BH crosscourt31%+1.5−0.4−1.9−0.8±2.7
BH down the line20%−0.5−0.3+2.3+1.5±4.8
FH inside-in5%+0.7−1.9−1.3−2.5±4.5
FH through the middle3%−2.7+1.7−0.1−1.1±2.4

Lean BH down the line: +1.8±4.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (582 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Ashleigh Barty returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KarolinaValue
FH through the middle43%+4.2±0.0−0.1+4.0±1.9
FH crosscourt25%+5.3−1.0−1.4+2.9±3.5
FH down the line17%+1.5+3.2−0.7+4.0±3.8
FH slice through the middle9%−6.7−0.6−1.7−9.0±2.4
FH slice crosscourt4%−6.6−1.0−2.5−10.1±2.8

Lean FH through the middle: +2.3±1.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (769 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KarolinaValue
BH slice through the middle29%−6.2+1.7−1.1−5.7±2.1
BH through the middle29%+6.0−0.9+0.1+5.2±1.9
BH crosscourt17%+7.7−0.3+0.3+7.7±2.7
BH slice crosscourt12%−4.2+0.7−2.1−5.5±2.9
BH down the line7%+2.2−0.2+0.2+2.2±4.2

Lean BH crosscourt: +7.6±2.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (911 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KarolinaValue
FH crosscourt47%+0.5+2.4−3.9−1.0±3.9
FH through the middle40%−3.2−1.6+0.5−4.2±2.6
FH down the line13%−0.6+2.4−1.0+0.8±4.5

Lean FH down the line: +2.8±4.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (161 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KarolinaValue
BH slice crosscourt24%−7.5−1.7−1.3−10.5±2.6
BH through the middle23%−2.6−3.0−0.7−6.3±2.2
BH crosscourt16%+1.5+1.4−1.3+1.6±3.0
BH slice through the middle14%−11.7−0.3+0.3−11.7±2.2
BH down the line7%−0.5−1.2−2.0−3.7±4.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +7.7±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (526 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Karolina Muchova

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH slice to the middle · return+0.9±2.1+2.6−1.7
FH to the middle · return+0.8±1.6+0.9−0.1
BH to the middle · serve +1+0.8±1.8+0.3+0.5
BH to their backhand · return +1+0.4±2.7+0.8−0.5
FH slice to the middle · rally+0.2±2.5+0.9−0.7
BH to the middle · return+0.1±1.3+0.2−0.1

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH volley to their backhand · rally−8.0±5.8−1.4−6.5
BH volley to their forehand · rally−7.0±5.9+0.3−7.3
FH to their backhand · rally−6.1±1.8−1.4−4.7
FH to their forehand · return +1−5.9±2.7−2.2−3.7
FH volley to their forehand · rally−5.3±5.5−1.2−4.1

Ashleigh Barty

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH volley to their backhand · rally+3.3±6.0+2.3+1.1
FH to their backhand · return+2.3±3.0+3.3−1.0
BH to their backhand · return +1+0.8±2.7+0.6+0.2
FH to their backhand · serve +1+0.8±2.4+1.7−0.9
FH to their forehand · serve +1+0.8±2.2+2.3−1.5
BH to the middle · return +1+0.6±1.9+0.1+0.4

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to their backhand · return−5.1±2.7−2.5−2.7
BH to their forehand · return +1−4.8±4.3−1.1−3.6
FH slice to the middle · rally−3.9±2.6−1.2−2.6
FH slice to their backhand · rally−3.7±3.7−2.8−0.8
FH to their forehand · return−3.1±2.9+0.3−3.4

Against Ashleigh Barty-like opponents

Karolina Muchova vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–61.6%42.9%
Players most similar to Ashleigh Barty5 62.8%40.5%
Ashleigh Barty (charted head-to-head)1 61.7%40.5%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Barbora Krejcikova, Clara Tauson, Diane Parry, Maria Sakkari, Jennifer Brady, Polona Hercog, Kiki Bertens, Francesca Schiavone, Roberta Vinci. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head