RallyIQ

Game plan

Lorenzo Musetti v Daniil Medvedev

Every number combines what Lorenzo Musetti does well with what Daniil Medvedev allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Lorenzo Musetti wins, best of 3 50%90%: 25%–75% · best of 5: 50%
Serve points won 59.4% / 59.4% Lorenzo / Daniil · tour 63.5%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 48%serve 60.4% / 60.8%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. Both were charted enough in the last three seasons, so those carry the most weight. The result is then nudged by Lorenzo Musetti's record against Daniil Medvedev's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −1.3 on serve, +3.5 on return vs expectation (2744 points); head-to-head: −5.7 on serve, −4.7 on return vs expectation (228 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerLorenzoDaniil
Direction choice−0.02 ±0.04
better than 50%
+0.01 ±0.04
better than 58%
Shot selection−0.57 ±0.10
better than 9%
−0.06 ±0.04
better than 46%
Execution+0.48 ±0.22
better than 83%
+1.24 ±0.16
better than 98%
Points left on the table2.74 ±0.06
lower than 35%
2.31 ±0.06
lower than 84%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Lorenzo Musetti +1.43, Daniil Medvedev +0.43. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Lorenzo Musetti serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowLorenzo winsv DaniilMatchupOptimal
Wide41%70%69%65.8%±2.538% ▼
Body9%64%58%58.8%±5.20% ▼
T49%72%71%67.7%±2.462% ▲

Optimal v Daniil Medvedev: +0.4±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +1.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowLorenzo winsv DaniilMatchupOptimal
Wide55%69%69%65.2%±2.450% ▼
Body8%61%58%56.2%±5.70% ▼
T37%69%70%66.4%±2.750% ▲

Optimal v Daniil Medvedev: +0.4±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +1.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Daniil Medvedev serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowDaniil winsv LorenzoMatchupOptimal
Wide49%74%72%73.4%±2.141% ▼
Body4%63%61%60.9%±5.80% ▼
T46%78%71%74.8%±2.259% ▲

Optimal v Lorenzo Musetti: +0.3±0.3 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowDaniil winsv LorenzoMatchupOptimal
Wide49%78%68%73.3%±2.240% ▼
Body5%60%63%59.5%±6.50% ▼
T47%74%71%73.3%±2.360% ▲

Optimal v Lorenzo Musetti: +0.8±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +0.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Lorenzo Musetti returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DaniilValue
FH through the middle40%+4.3−0.5+1.6+5.3±1.2
FH down the line24%+1.7−1.4−0.7−0.5±2.3
FH slice through the middle15%−4.2−0.4+1.1−3.5±1.3
FH crosscourt10%+5.5+2.3±0.0+7.9±2.8
FH slice down the line8%−4.3+0.2−0.7−4.8±2.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +6.1±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (2257 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DaniilValue
BH slice through the middle27%−4.2+1.4−0.6−3.5±1.1
BH through the middle25%+6.4+1.1+2.0+9.5±1.2
BH crosscourt20%+8.8+1.4+1.0+11.2±1.9
BH slice crosscourt11%+0.5−0.6−2.6−2.7±2.0
BH down the line9%+4.2±0.0+1.1+5.3±3.2

Lean BH crosscourt: +8.1±1.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (2587 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DaniilValue
FH through the middle47%−3.5+1.1+1.1−1.3±1.6
FH down the line25%−1.8−1.0−0.3−3.1±3.4
FH crosscourt23%−0.2−1.2−1.3−2.7±3.1
FH slice through the middle3%−12.7−0.7±0.0−13.3±2.3
FH slice down the line2%−9.4+1.2−1.8−10.0±2.8

Lean FH through the middle: +1.3±1.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (600 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DaniilValue
BH through the middle33%−2.9+1.0+0.4−1.5±1.2
BH crosscourt27%+1.0+1.4+0.6+3.1±1.6
BH down the line14%−0.2−1.8+1.6−0.4±3.4
FH through the middle10%−2.9+1.2+1.1−0.5±1.5
FH inside-out6%+1.0−1.1−0.3−0.5±2.8

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.7±1.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (1827 returns charted)

Daniil Medvedev returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv LorenzoValue
FH through the middle47%+4.3+1.4+0.8+6.4±1.0
FH crosscourt22%+5.5+3.4+0.4+9.3±2.4
FH down the line15%+1.7−0.5−2.1−0.9±2.3
FH slice through the middle10%−4.2−1.1+0.4−4.9±1.7
FH slice down the line4%−4.3−0.1+1.1−3.3±2.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.1±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (5958 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv LorenzoValue
BH through the middle48%+6.4+3.1+0.5+9.9±0.9
BH crosscourt25%+8.8+2.4−0.9+10.3±1.4
BH down the line10%+4.2+1.6−0.7+5.1±2.9
BH slice through the middle9%−4.2−1.9−0.8−6.9±1.7
BH slice crosscourt4%+0.5−4.5−1.0−4.9±2.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.7±1.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (4981 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv LorenzoValue
FH through the middle50%−3.5+1.6−0.8−2.6±1.5
FH crosscourt27%−0.2−1.0+1.1−0.2±3.0
FH down the line17%−1.8+1.7−0.5−0.6±3.2
FH slice through the middle2%−12.7−0.8−1.7−15.1±2.3
BH through the middle2%+0.1+1.2+0.2+1.5±1.6

Lean BH through the middle: +3.4±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (1558 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv LorenzoValue
BH through the middle51%−2.9+2.9+0.2+0.3±1.1
BH crosscourt38%+1.0+1.9−0.7+2.2±1.4
BH down the line9%−0.2+1.2−0.8+0.3±3.8
FH through the middle1%−2.9−1.0−0.8−4.6±1.9
FH inside-in1%+0.6−2.8+1.1−1.2±3.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.3±1.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (2951 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Lorenzo Musetti

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH drop shot to their backhand · serve +1+5.5±4.0+3.3+2.2
FH lob to the middle · rally+4.4±3.6+0.5+3.9
FH to the middle · serve +1+4.2±1.1+2.2+2.0
BH to their backhand · return +1+3.8±1.5+2.8+1.1
BH volley to the middle · rally+3.6±4.9−2.8+6.4
BH lob to the middle · rally+3.5±2.7+2.7+0.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH drop shot to their forehand · serve +1−5.3±5.3−1.5−3.7
BH drop shot to their forehand · rally−5.2±4.3−1.2−4.0
BH to their forehand · return +1−5.1±2.7−2.5−2.6
BH slice to their forehand · return−4.2±2.9−0.2−4.0
BH slice to their backhand · return−2.9±1.7−0.5−2.4

Daniil Medvedev

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH volley to their forehand · serve +1+4.5±5.6+6.3−1.8
BH to the middle · return+4.3±0.7+2.9+1.4
BH to their backhand · return +1+3.4±1.2+2.0+1.4
FH to their forehand · return+3.2±2.0+2.7+0.5
FH to the middle · return+2.5±0.8+2.0+0.4
BH to the middle · return +1+2.4±1.2+2.1+0.3

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH slice to their backhand · return +1−7.3±3.4−2.4−4.9
BH slice to their backhand · return +1−5.9±2.1−3.1−2.8
BH slice to their forehand · return +1−5.6±3.3−1.6−4.0
BH slice to their backhand · rally−5.4±1.3−2.0−3.4
Smash to their forehand · rally−5.3±3.4−1.9−3.5

Against Daniil Medvedev-like opponents

Lorenzo Musetti vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–63.0%37.7%
Players most similar to Daniil Medvedev16 59.5%38.6%
Daniil Medvedev (charted head-to-head)2 54.6%32.1%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Alexander Zverev, Novak Djokovic, Jenson Brooksby, Karen Khachanov, Taylor Fritz, Miomir Kecmanovic, Richard Gasquet, Andy Murray, John Millman, Gilles Simon. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head