RallyIQ

Game plan

Marin Cilic v Alexander Shevchenko

Every number combines what Marin Cilic does well with what Alexander Shevchenko allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Marin Cilic wins, best of 3 86%90%: 66%–96% · best of 5: 91%
Serve points won 67.7% / 59.1% Marin / Alexander · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 85%serve 67.7% / 59.4%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Marin Cilic's record against Alexander Shevchenko's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +0.1 on serve, +4.1 on return vs expectation (239 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerMarinAlexander
Direction choice+0.14 ±0.05
better than 87%
+0.04 ±0.10
better than 68%
Shot selection+0.28 ±0.08
better than 78%
−0.13 ±0.20
better than 35%
Execution−1.01 ±0.32
better than 25%
−0.49 ±0.62
better than 45%
Points left on the table2.18 ±0.08
lower than 93%
2.49 ±0.17
lower than 61%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Marin Cilic −0.40, Alexander Shevchenko −0.52. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Marin Cilic serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMarin winsv AlexanderMatchupOptimal
Wide50%73%73%73.2%±5.141% ▼
Body4%58%71%66.7%±12.10% ▼
T46%80%79%83.9%±4.159% ▲

Optimal v Alexander Shevchenko: +0.7±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +6.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMarin winsv AlexanderMatchupOptimal
Wide53%76%73%76.0%±4.847% ▼
Body7%63%63%63.3%±13.10% ▼
T40%76%76%79.6%±5.153% ▲

Optimal v Alexander Shevchenko: +0.5±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +3.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Alexander Shevchenko serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowAlexander winsv MarinMatchupOptimal
Wide52%65%74%66.5%±5.247% ▼
Body8%59%67%62.9%±10.40% ▼
T40%66%74%65.0%±6.153% ▲

Optimal v Marin Cilic: +0.2±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +0.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowAlexander winsv MarinMatchupOptimal
Wide49%62%76%65.8%±5.862% ▲
Body8%60%59%56.0%±11.40% ▼
T44%61%71%59.9%±6.338% ▼

Optimal v Marin Cilic: +0.5±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Marin Cilic returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexanderValue
FH through the middle54%+4.3−0.2+1.4+5.5±2.2
FH crosscourt24%+5.5−1.8+3.1+6.8±3.7
FH down the line21%+1.7−1.0+0.7+1.3±3.9
FH slice through the middle1%−4.2+1.3−0.2−3.1±2.2
FH slice crosscourt0%−4.3+0.1+0.2−4.0±2.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.0±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (1630 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexanderValue
BH through the middle42%+6.4±0.0+2.5+9.0±2.1
BH crosscourt31%+8.8−4.3+1.8+6.3±2.8
BH slice through the middle10%−4.2−4.5+1.7−7.0±2.3
BH down the line8%+4.2+4.7+4.1+13.1±4.4
BH slice crosscourt8%+0.5−4.3−1.1−4.8±2.8

Lean BH down the line: +7.5±4.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (1619 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexanderValue
FH through the middle51%−3.5±0.0−0.8−4.3±2.5
FH down the line26%−1.8+1.0−0.3−1.1±4.5
FH crosscourt23%−0.2−1.1+2.2+0.9±4.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.2±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (484 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexanderValue
BH crosscourt48%+1.0−2.7+2.9+1.2±2.5
BH through the middle40%−2.9+0.3+0.9−1.7±2.1
BH down the line6%−0.2+0.5+4.3+4.6±5.0
FH inside-in2%+0.6+1.2+2.2+4.0±4.2
FH inside-out2%+1.0+0.7−0.3+1.4±3.5

Lean BH down the line: +4.4±4.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (924 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Alexander Shevchenko returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarinValue
FH through the middle45%+4.3+3.5−1.4+6.3±2.3
FH crosscourt24%+5.5+1.7−1.4+5.8±3.9
FH down the line11%+1.7+0.6−1.6+0.8±3.8
FH slice through the middle11%−4.2−0.9+0.9−4.1±2.1
FH slice crosscourt5%−4.3−0.4+0.5−4.2±2.6

Lean FH through the middle: +2.7±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (245 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarinValue
BH through the middle36%+6.4+2.5−0.5+8.5±2.2
BH crosscourt27%+8.8+1.3+1.5+11.6±3.1
BH slice through the middle17%−4.2−0.2±0.0−4.4±2.1
BH slice crosscourt10%+0.5−1.2+1.2+0.5±2.7
BH down the line7%+4.2−0.6+0.1+3.8±4.2

Lean BH crosscourt: +6.1±2.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (298 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarinValue
FH through the middle55%−3.5−0.1+0.8−2.7±2.5
FH crosscourt38%−0.2−0.1−1.5−1.9±4.0
FH down the line7%−1.8−2.8+1.0−3.6±3.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +0.6±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (74 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarinValue
BH through the middle52%−2.9+1.8−0.6−1.7±1.9
BH crosscourt37%+1.0−1.6+0.2−0.4±2.5
BH down the line11%−0.2+1.0+1.2+1.9±4.3

Lean BH down the line: +2.7±4.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (238 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Marin Cilic

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return+6.7±3.9+0.8+5.8
BH to their forehand · serve +1+6.4±4.2+1.0+5.4
BH to their forehand · rally+3.2±3.3−0.3+3.5
FH to their forehand · return+3.0±3.5−0.4+3.4
BH to the middle · return+2.4±1.6+0.3+2.1
FH to their forehand · serve +1+2.1±2.8+0.5+1.5

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return +1−4.1±3.3−1.0−3.0
FH to their backhand · serve +1−2.8±2.5−2.7−0.1
BH to the middle · rally−2.5±1.6−2.0−0.6
BH to their backhand · rally−2.5±1.6−2.8+0.3
FH to the middle · rally−1.5±1.8−2.1+0.6

Alexander Shevchenko

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · return +1+1.9±2.4+1.9±0.0
BH to the middle · return +1+1.8±2.1+0.6+1.2
FH to the middle · return+1.5±2.0+2.0−0.6
FH to their forehand · return +1+1.4±3.5−0.3+1.7
BH to their backhand · return +1+0.6±2.7−0.1+0.8
BH to the middle · rally+0.6±1.4+0.7−0.1

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · rally−4.2±2.1−4.3+0.1
FH to their backhand · serve +1−4.0±2.5−3.6−0.3
BH to their forehand · rally−2.7±3.1−2.6−0.2
BH to their forehand · serve +1−1.9±4.1−2.5+0.6
FH to their forehand · serve +1−1.4±2.8−2.9+1.5

Against Alexander Shevchenko-like opponents

Marin Cilic vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–63.5%34.3%
Players most similar to Alexander Shevchenko2 65.5%38.3%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Arthur Fils, Jakub Mensik, Karen Khachanov, Laslo Djere, Alexandre Muller, Holger Rune, Roman Safiullin, Fabio Fognini, Otto Virtanen, Gregoire Barrere. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.