RallyIQ

Game plan

Maxime Cressy v Fabian Marozsan

Every number combines what Maxime Cressy does well with what Fabian Marozsan allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Maxime Cressy wins, best of 3 47%90%: 24%–72% · best of 5: 46%
Serve points won 67.2% / 67.8% Maxime / Fabian · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 49%serve 67.4% / 67.7%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Maxime Cressy's record against Fabian Marozsan's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −1.6 on serve, −0.9 on return vs expectation (516 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerMaximeFabian
Direction choice+0.07 ±0.13
better than 77%
+0.17 ±0.08
better than 91%
Shot selection+1.15 ±0.15
better than 99%
+0.04 ±0.26
better than 58%
Execution−1.85 ±0.64
better than 5%
+0.87 ±0.78
better than 93%
Points left on the table3.70 ±0.25
lower than 6%
2.29 ±0.13
lower than 85%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Maxime Cressy +0.46, Fabian Marozsan +0.79. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Maxime Cressy serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMaxime winsv FabianMatchupOptimal
Wide54%81%72%80.3%±4.447% ▼
Body5%68%61%66.2%±12.30% ▼
T40%81%79%84.4%±4.253% ▲

Optimal v Fabian Marozsan: +0.6±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +3.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMaxime winsv FabianMatchupOptimal
Wide64%78%72%77.6%±4.957% ▼
Body5%61%64%61.9%±13.80% ▼
T30%78%71%77.3%±5.843% ▲

Optimal v Fabian Marozsan: +0.5±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +0.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Fabian Marozsan serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowFabian winsv MaximeMatchupOptimal
Wide47%69%80%77.2%±4.860% ▲
Body10%69%67%72.3%±8.90% ▼
T44%69%77%70.8%±6.040% ▼

Optimal v Maxime Cressy: +0.8±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +3.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowFabian winsv MaximeMatchupOptimal
Wide50%71%80%78.1%±5.163% ▲
Body11%69%68%72.7%±9.10% ▼
T38%64%78%71.1%±6.237% ▼

Optimal v Maxime Cressy: +0.5±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Maxime Cressy returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FabianValue
FH through the middle45%+4.3±0.0+3.4+7.7±2.4
FH crosscourt34%+5.5−1.7+7.1+10.8±3.9
FH down the line12%+1.7−1.3+2.9+3.3±4.5
FH slice through the middle6%−4.2−1.0−0.6−5.8±2.3
FH slice crosscourt2%−4.3+0.1+0.5−3.7±2.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.8±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (584 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FabianValue
BH through the middle49%+6.4+0.5+3.5+10.4±2.3
BH crosscourt28%+8.8−1.8+4.9+11.9±3.2
BH down the line11%+4.2+2.9+3.4+10.5±4.6
BH slice through the middle7%−4.2−1.7+0.3−5.6±2.5
BH slice crosscourt3%+0.5−2.6+1.7−0.4±2.7

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.9±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (471 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FabianValue
FH crosscourt37%−0.2−5.7+0.9−5.1±4.4
FH through the middle29%−3.5+1.6+1.0−0.8±2.8
FH slice through the middle19%−12.7+0.3±0.0−12.3±1.6
FH slice down the line9%−9.4−0.8±0.0−10.3±1.7
FH down the line7%−1.8+0.5−0.7−2.0±4.1

Lean FH through the middle: +4.6±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (129 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FabianValue
BH through the middle46%−2.9−8.6+1.0−10.4±2.3
BH crosscourt32%+1.0−1.0+1.2+1.2±3.0
BH down the line15%−0.2−3.8+3.7−0.3±5.0
BH slice through the middle5%−11.3−0.4±0.0−11.7±1.4
BH slice crosscourt3%−4.0+0.4−1.6−5.2±1.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +6.4±2.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (278 returns charted)

Fabian Marozsan returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MaximeValue
FH through the middle39%+4.3+1.4−1.2+4.4±2.5
FH crosscourt19%+5.5+4.6−2.7+7.4±4.4
FH slice through the middle16%−4.2+0.1−1.7−5.8±2.3
FH down the line14%+1.7+4.8−2.0+4.6±4.4
FH slice down the line8%−4.3+1.0+0.3−3.0±2.7

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.0±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (360 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MaximeValue
BH through the middle40%+6.4+2.1−1.4+7.1±2.3
BH crosscourt30%+8.8+2.5+1.1+12.4±3.4
BH slice through the middle11%−4.2+0.2−4.6−8.6±2.4
BH down the line11%+4.2−1.2+1.7+4.7±4.6
BH slice crosscourt6%+0.5−0.9+0.5+0.1±2.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +6.6±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (317 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MaximeValue
FH through the middle44%−3.5+0.6−1.7−4.6±2.8
FH down the line26%−1.8−0.4−0.1−2.3±4.6
FH crosscourt24%−0.2+1.6+0.4+1.7±4.3
FH slice through the middle6%−12.7−0.1−0.5−13.2±1.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.7±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (104 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MaximeValue
BH through the middle47%−2.9+2.4−3.8−4.2±2.3
BH crosscourt40%+1.0+1.7−3.4−0.7±3.2
BH down the line13%−0.2+1.8−3.8−2.2±4.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.9±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (229 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Maxime Cressy

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · return+3.9±2.1+0.7+3.1
FH to their forehand · return+3.8±3.7−2.1+5.9
BH to their forehand · return+2.9±4.2−1.9+4.8
FH to the middle · rally+2.8±2.3+1.1+1.7
FH to their backhand · return+1.9±3.9±0.0+1.9
BH to their backhand · return+1.0±2.5−2.8+3.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · rally−5.9±2.6−5.6−0.3
BH to the middle · return +1−3.9±2.5−3.7−0.2
BH to their forehand · rally−2.9±4.3−3.3+0.4
FH to their forehand · return +1−2.7±3.8−5.6+2.9
BH to the middle · rally−2.3±2.1−2.0−0.3

Fabian Marozsan

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return +1+10.9±4.0+1.0+9.9
FH to their forehand · return +1+6.1±4.2+2.7+3.3
BH to their forehand · rally+4.1±4.2+1.0+3.1
FH to their forehand · serve +1+3.9±3.1+0.8+3.1
FH to their backhand · serve +1+3.2±2.9+1.4+1.8
FH to their forehand · return+3.1±4.3+4.7−1.6

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to their backhand · rally−4.5±2.5−3.9−0.6
BH to the middle · rally−1.8±2.0−1.6−0.2
FH to their backhand · return−1.7±3.8−0.3−1.4
FH to the middle · rally−0.6±2.2−0.3−0.3
FH to the middle · serve +1−0.6±2.4+0.6−1.2

Against Fabian Marozsan-like opponents

Maxime Cressy vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–68.8%29.1%
Players most similar to Fabian Marozsan3 66.4%29.8%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Joao Fonseca, Hubert Hurkacz, Carlos Alcaraz, Sebastian Korda, Zizou Bergs, Laslo Djere, Francisco Cerundolo, Roman Safiullin, Fabio Fognini, Kei Nishikori. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.