RallyIQ

Game plan

Nicolas Jarry v Nuno Borges

Every number combines what Nicolas Jarry does well with what Nuno Borges allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Nicolas Jarry wins, best of 3 61%90%: 33%–84% · best of 5: 63%
Serve points won 69.2% / 67.0% Nicolas / Nuno · tour 63.5%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 57%serve 68.4% / 66.9%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. Both were charted enough in the last three seasons, so those carry the most weight. The result is then nudged by Nicolas Jarry's record against Nuno Borges's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +16.7 on serve, −0.5 on return vs expectation (175 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerNicolasNuno
Direction choice−0.23 ±0.09
better than 9%
−0.11 ±0.16
better than 30%
Shot selection+0.02 ±0.14
better than 54%
−0.15 ±0.22
better than 34%
Execution−0.45 ±0.54
better than 46%
−0.87 ±0.52
better than 29%
Points left on the table3.09 ±0.16
lower than 16%
2.55 ±0.18
lower than 55%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Nicolas Jarry −2.80, Nuno Borges −0.71. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Nicolas Jarry serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowNicolas winsv NunoMatchupOptimal
Wide43%74%75%76.0%±5.148% ▲
Body6%64%66%66.6%±10.20% ▼
T51%74%79%78.8%±5.152% ▲

Optimal v Nuno Borges: +0.4±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +1.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowNicolas winsv NunoMatchupOptimal
Wide55%75%76%78.0%±4.768% ▲
Body8%67%73%76.0%±9.30% ▼
T38%75%70%72.7%±6.032% ▼

Optimal v Nuno Borges: +0.4±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Nuno Borges serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowNuno winsv NicolasMatchupOptimal
Wide43%74%76%76.5%±4.956% ▲
Body10%63%67%67.2%±9.70% ▼
T47%72%73%69.3%±5.644% ▼

Optimal v Nicolas Jarry: +0.7±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +4.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowNuno winsv NicolasMatchupOptimal
Wide47%71%76%74.8%±5.360% ▲
Body12%62%68%66.7%±10.20% ▼
T42%65%76%70.1%±6.040% ▼

Optimal v Nicolas Jarry: +0.9±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +2.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Nicolas Jarry returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NunoValue
FH through the middle61%+4.3+3.0+1.5+8.7±2.2
FH crosscourt20%+5.5+3.0+2.5+11.0±4.2
FH down the line13%+1.7+0.2−2.4−0.6±4.4
FH slice through the middle5%−4.2−0.3+0.8−3.7±2.3
BH through the middle1%+6.6+0.6−1.2+5.9±1.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.7±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (680 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NunoValue
BH through the middle51%+6.4+2.5−1.2+7.7±2.0
BH crosscourt28%+8.8+0.9−1.4+8.3±3.1
BH slice through the middle9%−4.2−0.9−0.8−5.9±2.5
BH down the line7%+4.2+6.5−1.2+9.5±4.6
BH slice crosscourt3%+0.5+0.3−2.5−1.6±2.8

Lean BH down the line: +3.3±4.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (773 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NunoValue
FH through the middle65%−3.5−0.7−1.4−5.6±2.8
FH crosscourt23%−0.2+2.1+0.2+2.0±4.4
FH down the line12%−1.8−3.0+2.1−2.7±4.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.5±3.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (149 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NunoValue
BH through the middle57%−2.9−2.0−1.5−6.4±2.0
BH crosscourt30%+1.0+0.7−3.0−1.3±2.9
BH down the line5%−0.2+0.1−1.3−1.5±4.9
FH through the middle5%−2.9+0.1−1.4−4.2±2.4
FH inside-in2%+0.6+0.5+0.2+1.3±4.1

Lean FH inside-in: +5.5±4.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (617 returns charted)

Nuno Borges returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NicolasValue
FH through the middle41%+4.3+0.9+2.6+7.8±2.5
FH slice through the middle22%−4.2−1.4+1.5−4.1±2.1
FH crosscourt13%+5.5−1.3−0.7+3.6±4.3
FH down the line10%+1.7+0.2−1.6+0.3±4.5
FH slice crosscourt7%−4.3−0.6+0.6−4.4±2.7

Lean FH through the middle: +5.5±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (300 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NicolasValue
BH through the middle47%+6.4+0.3+3.5+10.1±2.1
BH crosscourt28%+8.8−1.4+1.5+8.8±3.2
BH down the line11%+4.2±0.0+6.3+10.5±4.6
BH slice through the middle7%−4.2−0.5+1.2−3.5±2.2
BH slice crosscourt5%+0.5−4.7−0.4−4.6±2.8

Lean BH down the line: +2.7±4.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (321 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NicolasValue
FH through the middle45%−3.5+1.3+0.1−2.0±2.6
FH crosscourt29%−0.2+1.0−0.8−0.1±4.2
FH down the line26%−1.8+1.0+3.7+3.0±4.5

Lean FH down the line: +3.2±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (73 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NicolasValue
BH through the middle46%−2.9−0.4+2.0−1.4±2.1
BH crosscourt42%+1.0−1.8−0.2−1.0±2.9
BH down the line7%−0.2+0.8+4.2+4.8±4.7
FH inside-out2%+1.0−1.5+3.7+3.2±3.0
FH through the middle2%−2.9+0.3+0.1−2.5±1.7

Lean BH down the line: +5.5±4.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (223 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Nicolas Jarry

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return+4.5±4.0+2.2+2.2
BH to their forehand · return+3.4±4.3+5.0−1.6
FH to the middle · return+2.8±1.9+1.8+0.9
FH to their forehand · serve +1±0.0±3.0−0.9+0.8
FH to the middle · serve +1−0.8±2.2−2.6+1.8
FH to their backhand · serve +1−1.0±2.5−0.2−0.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · rally−7.6±1.7−6.1−1.5
BH slice to their backhand · rally−7.1±2.4−5.8−1.3
FH to their backhand · rally−6.9±2.2−4.4−2.5
BH slice to the middle · rally−6.8±2.3−5.0−1.8
BH to their backhand · rally−6.8±1.9−5.5−1.3

Nuno Borges

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return+6.5±4.4−0.3+6.8
BH to their forehand · return +1+2.3±5.0±0.0+2.3
FH to the middle · return+2.2±2.0+0.9+1.3
BH to the middle · return+2.0±1.6−0.8+2.8
FH to their backhand · return+0.4±4.0−0.7+1.1
FH to their backhand · serve +1+0.1±2.7−0.5+0.5

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH slice to the middle · rally−3.5±2.6−1.7−1.8
FH to the middle · return +1−3.0±2.5−0.2−2.7
FH to the middle · rally−2.9±1.7−1.6−1.3
BH to the middle · return +1−2.9±2.1−1.9−1.0
FH to their forehand · return−2.9±4.3−1.7−1.2

Against Nuno Borges-like opponents

Nicolas Jarry vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–66.1%32.8%
Players most similar to Nuno Borges1 84.0%35.1%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Ben Shelton, Gael Monfils, Zhizhen Zhang, Alejandro Tabilo, Zizou Bergs, Miomir Kecmanovic, Arthur Cazaux, Mackenzie Mcdonald, Jordan Thompson, Filip Krajinovic. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.