RallyIQ

Game plan

Nicolas Jarry v Thiago Monteiro

Every number combines what Nicolas Jarry does well with what Thiago Monteiro allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Nicolas Jarry wins, best of 3 69%90%: 46%–86% · best of 5: 73%
Serve points won 71.7% / 67.5% Nicolas / Thiago · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 65%serve 71.3% / 68.0%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Nicolas Jarry's record against Thiago Monteiro's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +6.8 on serve, +7.8 on return vs expectation (192 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerNicolasThiago
Direction choice−0.23 ±0.09
better than 9%
−0.01 ±0.13
better than 56%
Shot selection+0.02 ±0.14
better than 54%
−0.12 ±0.30
better than 36%
Execution−0.45 ±0.54
better than 46%
−0.36 ±0.78
better than 51%
Points left on the table3.09 ±0.16
lower than 16%
2.77 ±0.27
lower than 33%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Nicolas Jarry serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowNicolas winsv ThiagoMatchupOptimal
Wide43%74%69%70.4%±6.056% ▲
Body6%64%58%59.1%±12.50% ▼
T51%74%80%80.1%±5.844% ▼

Optimal v Thiago Monteiro: +0.5±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +5.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowNicolas winsv ThiagoMatchupOptimal
Wide55%75%79%80.2%±5.849% ▼
Body8%67%64%67.7%±11.30% ▼
T38%75%76%78.7%±5.551% ▲

Optimal v Thiago Monteiro: +0.7±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Thiago Monteiro serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowThiago winsv NicolasMatchupOptimal
Wide39%79%76%81.1%±5.852% ▲
Body9%61%67%65.3%±11.20% ▼
T53%71%73%68.8%±6.348% ▼

Optimal v Nicolas Jarry: +0.7±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +7.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowThiago winsv NicolasMatchupOptimal
Wide60%69%76%72.5%±5.453% ▼
Body7%59%68%64.2%±12.30% ▼
T34%80%76%83.7%±5.847% ▲

Optimal v Nicolas Jarry: +0.8±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +8.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Nicolas Jarry returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ThiagoValue
FH through the middle61%+4.3+3.0−1.3+5.9±2.6
FH crosscourt20%+5.5+3.0−2.5+5.9±4.2
FH down the line13%+1.7+0.2−0.3+1.5±3.9
FH slice through the middle5%−4.2−0.3+0.1−4.4±2.2
BH through the middle1%+6.6+0.6+1.2+8.4±2.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.1±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (680 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ThiagoValue
BH through the middle51%+6.4+2.5+1.2+10.2±2.2
BH crosscourt28%+8.8+0.9+2.4+12.1±3.2
BH slice through the middle9%−4.2−0.9−0.8−5.9±2.5
BH down the line7%+4.2+6.5−0.1+10.6±4.6
BH slice crosscourt3%+0.5+0.3+0.7+1.6±2.8

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.3±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (773 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ThiagoValue
FH through the middle65%−3.5−0.7+0.4−3.7±2.8
FH crosscourt23%−0.2+2.1−1.1+0.8±4.4
FH down the line12%−1.8−3.0−1.1−5.9±4.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.7±3.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (149 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ThiagoValue
BH through the middle57%−2.9−2.0+1.1−3.8±2.2
BH crosscourt30%+1.0+0.7+2.2+3.9±3.0
BH down the line5%−0.2+0.1−0.4−0.5±4.7
FH through the middle5%−2.9+0.1+0.4−2.4±2.3
FH inside-in2%+0.6+0.5−1.1±0.0±4.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.0±2.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (617 returns charted)

Thiago Monteiro returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NicolasValue
FH through the middle47%+4.3+0.5+2.6+7.4±2.7
FH crosscourt21%+5.5+2.8−1.6+6.7±4.3
FH down the line21%+1.7−1.6−0.7−0.7±4.3
FH slice through the middle11%−4.2+0.8+1.5−1.9±1.9

Lean FH through the middle: +2.8±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (126 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NicolasValue
BH through the middle43%+6.4−1.0+3.5+8.9±2.2
BH slice through the middle18%−4.2−0.7+1.2−3.7±2.3
BH down the line15%+4.2−1.8+1.5+3.9±4.2
BH crosscourt14%+8.8−1.9+6.3+13.2±3.6
BH slice crosscourt5%+0.5−1.5−0.6−1.6±2.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +8.0±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (275 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NicolasValue
FH through the middle50%−3.5+0.2+0.1−3.1±2.6
FH crosscourt41%−0.2±0.0+3.7+3.5±4.3
FH down the line9%−1.8−0.9−0.8−3.5±3.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.9±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (66 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NicolasValue
BH through the middle39%−2.9+0.1+2.0−0.9±2.1
BH crosscourt32%+1.0+2.0+4.2+7.3±3.3
FH through the middle11%−2.9−1.1+0.1−3.9±2.0
BH down the line10%−0.2−3.7−0.2−4.1±4.0
FH inside-in8%+0.6+1.1+3.7+5.4±4.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.7±2.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (146 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Nicolas Jarry

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return+8.7±4.3+5.0+3.7
BH to the middle · return+2.6±1.9−0.3+2.9
BH to their backhand · return+0.5±2.8−0.4+0.9
FH to their backhand · serve +1±0.0±2.8−0.2+0.2
FH to their forehand · serve +1±0.0±3.2−0.9+0.8
FH to the middle · return−0.2±2.2+1.8−2.0

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · rally−9.2±2.3−5.5−3.7
FH to the middle · rally−7.7±2.0−6.1−1.6
BH to the middle · return +1−6.4±2.2−5.4−1.0
FH to their backhand · rally−5.2±2.2−4.4−0.8
BH to the middle · rally−4.9±1.8−3.3−1.5

Thiago Monteiro

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return+7.4±4.4+0.6+6.8
BH to the middle · return+3.8±1.8+1.0+2.8
FH to their backhand · return+3.7±4.0+2.6+1.1
BH to their forehand · return +1+3.4±5.0+1.1+2.3
BH to the middle · rally+0.9±1.7+2.2−1.3
FH to their forehand · serve +1+0.3±3.4−0.7+1.0

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · rally−5.0±2.5−4.9−0.1
FH to the middle · serve +1−3.4±2.4−1.2−2.2
BH to their backhand · return−3.3±2.9−4.0+0.7
FH to their backhand · return +1−1.7±3.9+0.4−2.1
FH to their forehand · rally−1.7±3.0−2.4+0.7

Against Thiago Monteiro-like opponents

Nicolas Jarry vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–66.1%32.8%
Players most similar to Thiago Monteiro2 76.3%44.4%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Cameron Norrie, Luciano Darderi, Gael Monfils, Juncheng Shang, Daniel Elahi Galan, Albert Ramos, Dusan Lajovic, Cristian Garin, Federico Delbonis, Pablo Cuevas. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.