RallyIQ

Game plan

Novak Djokovic v Nick Kyrgios

Every number combines what Novak Djokovic does well with what Nick Kyrgios allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Novak Djokovic wins, best of 3 87%90%: 74%–95% · best of 5: 92%
Serve points won 72.5% / 63.0% Novak / Nick · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 80%serve 70.5% / 63.7%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Novak Djokovic's record against Nick Kyrgios's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +6.7 on serve, +3.2 on return vs expectation (1063 points); head-to-head: +4.2 on serve, −1.9 on return vs expectation (244 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerNovakNick
Direction choice+0.04 ±0.02
better than 70%
−0.04 ±0.06
better than 46%
Shot selection+0.04 ±0.03
better than 58%
−0.09 ±0.06
better than 41%
Execution+1.17 ±0.10
better than 97%
+0.99 ±0.32
better than 95%
Points left on the table2.24 ±0.03
lower than 89%
2.66 ±0.12
lower than 44%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Novak Djokovic +2.07, Nick Kyrgios −0.17. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Novak Djokovic serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowNovak winsv NickMatchupOptimal
Wide46%74%81%82.3%±1.759% ▲
Body9%67%65%68.4%±4.00% ▼
T45%76%78%78.9%±1.941% ▼

Optimal v Nick Kyrgios: +1.1±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +2.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowNovak winsv NickMatchupOptimal
Wide51%74%80%81.0%±2.064% ▲
Body9%63%70%70.2%±4.10% ▼
T40%73%74%74.6%±2.136% ▼

Optimal v Nick Kyrgios: +0.4±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +3.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Nick Kyrgios serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowNick winsv NovakMatchupOptimal
Wide38%77%69%73.0%±2.128% ▼
Body3%62%58%56.7%±6.80% ▼
T59%83%71%80.2%±1.772% ▲

Optimal v Novak Djokovic: +0.4±0.3 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +3.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowNick winsv NovakMatchupOptimal
Wide46%79%69%75.8%±2.245%
Body5%59%57%52.8%±6.10% ▼
T49%75%69%71.8%±2.155% ▲

Optimal v Novak Djokovic: +0.5±0.2 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +3.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Novak Djokovic returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NickValue
FH through the middle49%+4.3+0.5−0.2+4.5±1.1
FH down the line20%+1.7+1.9+1.5+5.1±2.4
FH crosscourt18%+5.5+0.3+0.7+6.5±2.5
FH slice through the middle8%−4.2+1.5+3.1+0.4±1.3
FH slice down the line2%−4.3+1.4+3.3+0.4±2.8
BH inside-in0%+7.7+2.5+0.6+10.8±3.1

Lean BH inside-in: +6.3±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (11120 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NickValue
BH through the middle38%+6.4+0.5+1.2+8.1±1.1
BH crosscourt24%+8.8+1.4+0.6+10.8±1.9
BH slice through the middle15%−4.2−0.2+0.8−3.6±1.2
BH down the line11%+4.2+2.2+1.1+7.5±3.1
BH slice crosscourt8%+0.5−1.0+0.4−0.1±1.9
FH inside-out0%+8.6+1.3+1.5+11.4±3.0

Lean FH inside-out: +5.8±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (9500 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NickValue
FH through the middle54%−3.5+1.3+0.6−1.5±1.4
FH down the line28%−1.8+1.5−0.2−0.5±3.2
FH crosscourt16%−0.2+1.5−4.4−3.1±3.3
BH through the middle1%+0.1−1.2+1.5+0.4±1.6
BH inside-out1%+0.9−0.4+3.9+4.4±3.8

Lean BH inside-out: +5.8±4.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (2581 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NickValue
BH crosscourt43%+1.0+1.4+1.3+3.8±1.5
BH through the middle43%−2.9+0.7+1.5−0.7±1.0
BH down the line10%−0.2+2.0+3.9+5.7±3.5
FH through the middle2%−2.9−0.9+0.6−3.2±1.9
FH inside-out1%+1.0+0.1−0.2+0.8±3.4

Lean BH down the line: +4.0±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (6220 returns charted)

Nick Kyrgios returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NovakValue
FH through the middle51%+4.3+0.9−0.4+4.7±1.0
FH down the line19%+1.7+1.6−0.2+3.0±2.3
FH crosscourt13%+5.5+2.3+0.6+8.4±2.6
FH slice through the middle12%−4.2+2.2+1.0−1.0±1.5
FH slice down the line4%−4.3+3.5−0.1−0.8±2.6

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.4±2.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (1842 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NovakValue
BH through the middle44%+6.4+2.4+0.5+9.3±1.1
BH crosscourt27%+8.8+2.1+0.7+11.5±1.7
BH slice through the middle12%−4.2+1.3+0.5−2.4±1.5
BH down the line7%+4.2+0.4+0.3+4.9±3.3
BH slice crosscourt5%+0.5+0.2+1.0+1.7±2.2

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.4±1.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (1682 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NovakValue
FH through the middle53%−3.5+0.1+0.3−3.1±1.5
FH down the line20%−1.8+1.5−2.6−2.9±3.2
FH crosscourt17%−0.2+1.4−1.6−0.4±3.1
FH slice through the middle3%−12.7+0.5−0.8−13.0±2.2
BH through the middle2%+0.1+0.8+0.6+1.5±1.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.4±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (593 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NovakValue
BH crosscourt38%+1.0+1.3+0.9+3.2±1.5
BH through the middle38%−2.9−0.1+0.6−2.4±1.2
BH down the line15%−0.2+1.8±0.0+1.6±3.2
FH through the middle2%−2.9+0.8+0.3−1.9±1.7
FH inside-in2%+0.6−1.3−1.6−2.4±3.2

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.1±1.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (1256 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Novak Djokovic

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH volley to the middle · rally+10.2±4.6+5.2+5.0
FH volley to their backhand · rally+6.8±4.3+2.7+4.1
BH to their forehand · serve +1+5.2±2.2+0.4+4.8
FH to their backhand · serve +1+4.7±1.2+0.6+4.2
BH to their forehand · return+4.6±2.4+1.8+2.9
BH volley to their backhand · rally+4.5±4.3+2.1+2.4

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH volley to their forehand · rally−4.5±4.3±0.0−4.4
BH slice to the middle · serve +1−3.0±2.4+0.2−3.2
BH slice to their backhand · serve +1−2.7±2.2−2.9+0.2
BH slice to the middle · return +1−1.9±1.5+0.8−2.7
BH slice to their forehand · return−1.6±2.8−1.5−0.1

Nick Kyrgios

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH volley to the middle · serve +1+5.9±4.3+3.4+2.5
BH volley to their forehand · rally+5.6±4.5+4.6+1.0
BH volley to the middle · rally+5.5±4.7+5.3+0.2
BH volley to the middle · serve +1+5.0±3.9+1.7+3.4
FH volley to the middle · rally+4.0±5.2+4.0±0.0
FH slice to their backhand · return+3.0±2.5+2.8+0.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH drop shot to their backhand · serve +1−6.3±4.6−4.4−1.9
BH to their forehand · return +1−3.6±2.5−3.9+0.3
BH slice to their backhand · rally−3.0±1.4−3.9+0.8
BH to the middle · serve +1−2.6±1.3−3.0+0.5
BH slice to the middle · return +1−2.5±1.6−3.4+0.8

Against Nick Kyrgios-like opponents

Novak Djokovic vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–66.9%40.4%
Players most similar to Nick Kyrgios9 75.9%43.6%
Nick Kyrgios (charted head-to-head)1 74.8%34.4%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Arthur Rinderknech, Zhizhen Zhang, Nuno Borges, Zizou Bergs, Yannick Hanfmann, Mackenzie Mcdonald, Otto Virtanen, Borna Coric, Kevin Anderson, Martin Klizan. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head